“现在,让我们在可能的时候炫耀一下”:第一人称复数和抒情的声音

Eileen Sperry
{"title":"“现在,让我们在可能的时候炫耀一下”:第一人称复数和抒情的声音","authors":"Eileen Sperry","doi":"10.1093/camqtly/bfz016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article briefly explores the history of reading lyric as a singular voice and, in response, proposes reading lyric through the lens of first-person- plural deixis. After surveying major moments in lyric theory, including recent accounts of lyric as a dialectic of ritual/fictional modes, the author then turns to Herrick’s ‘Corinna’s Going A-Maying’ and Marvell’s ‘To His Coy Mistress’ to explore possibilities for new critical approaches. Reading such works for their use of the lyric ‘we’ can help deconstruct false binaries, remove lyric from the domain of narrative, and sustain a richer and more complex model of the lyric voice.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.","PeriodicalId":374258,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Quarterly","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Now Let Us Sport Us While We May’: First Person Plural and the Lyric Voice\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Sperry\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/camqtly/bfz016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article briefly explores the history of reading lyric as a singular voice and, in response, proposes reading lyric through the lens of first-person- plural deixis. After surveying major moments in lyric theory, including recent accounts of lyric as a dialectic of ritual/fictional modes, the author then turns to Herrick’s ‘Corinna’s Going A-Maying’ and Marvell’s ‘To His Coy Mistress’ to explore possibilities for new critical approaches. Reading such works for their use of the lyric ‘we’ can help deconstruct false binaries, remove lyric from the domain of narrative, and sustain a richer and more complex model of the lyric voice.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cambridge Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cambridge Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfz016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfz016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文简要探讨了以单数方式阅读抒情诗的历史,并提出通过第一人称-复数指示语的视角来阅读抒情诗。在考察了抒情理论的主要时刻,包括最近将抒情作为仪式/虚构模式的辩证法的叙述之后,作者随后转向赫里克的“科琳娜的去a - mying”和马维尔的“致他害羞的情妇”,以探索新的批评方法的可能性。阅读这些作品,因为它们使用了抒情的“我们”,可以帮助解构虚假的二元对立,将抒情从叙事领域中移除,并维持更丰富、更复杂的抒情声音模型。这篇文章是《剑桥季刊》第48卷第48期题为“诗歌的我们”的四篇文章之一。3.这四篇文章形成了一个整体,有许多共同的关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Now Let Us Sport Us While We May’: First Person Plural and the Lyric Voice
Abstract:This article briefly explores the history of reading lyric as a singular voice and, in response, proposes reading lyric through the lens of first-person- plural deixis. After surveying major moments in lyric theory, including recent accounts of lyric as a dialectic of ritual/fictional modes, the author then turns to Herrick’s ‘Corinna’s Going A-Maying’ and Marvell’s ‘To His Coy Mistress’ to explore possibilities for new critical approaches. Reading such works for their use of the lyric ‘we’ can help deconstruct false binaries, remove lyric from the domain of narrative, and sustain a richer and more complex model of the lyric voice.This essay is one of four appearing under the heading ‘Poetry’s We’ in The Cambridge Quarterly vol. 48 no. 3. The four essays evolved as a group and have many shared concerns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信