Northcliffe诉Plender: 1916年大后方

E. A. French
{"title":"Northcliffe诉Plender: 1916年大后方","authors":"E. A. French","doi":"10.1080/09585209600000053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Great War the task of administering the affairs of the branches of enemy banks in Britain was entrusted to an accountant, Sir William Plender. This paper considers his performance, in view of the public criticisms made of it in 1916 by Lord Northcliffe. It argues that the criticisms are ill-founded. However, in 1916, the war was going badly for the Allies. Many thought a change of government was needed. Press attacks, such as that described, played a decisive part in achieving this change, which was crucial to the war's outcome. The attack on Plender thus made a significant contribution to the Allied victory.","PeriodicalId":252763,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Business and Financial History","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Northcliffe v. Plender: the home front, 1916\",\"authors\":\"E. A. French\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09585209600000053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the Great War the task of administering the affairs of the branches of enemy banks in Britain was entrusted to an accountant, Sir William Plender. This paper considers his performance, in view of the public criticisms made of it in 1916 by Lord Northcliffe. It argues that the criticisms are ill-founded. However, in 1916, the war was going badly for the Allies. Many thought a change of government was needed. Press attacks, such as that described, played a decisive part in achieving this change, which was crucial to the war's outcome. The attack on Plender thus made a significant contribution to the Allied victory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting, Business and Financial History\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting, Business and Financial History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585209600000053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Business and Financial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585209600000053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在第一次世界大战期间,管理敌国银行在英国分行事务的任务委托给了一位会计师,威廉·普伦德爵士。鉴于1916年诺斯克利夫勋爵对他的表演所作的公开批评,本文对他的表演进行了研究。它认为这些批评是没有根据的。然而,1916年,协约国的战争形势不妙。许多人认为需要更换政府。如上所述,媒体攻击在实现这一变化方面发挥了决定性作用,而这一变化对战争的结果至关重要。因此,对普伦德的进攻为盟军的胜利做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Northcliffe v. Plender: the home front, 1916
During the Great War the task of administering the affairs of the branches of enemy banks in Britain was entrusted to an accountant, Sir William Plender. This paper considers his performance, in view of the public criticisms made of it in 1916 by Lord Northcliffe. It argues that the criticisms are ill-founded. However, in 1916, the war was going badly for the Allies. Many thought a change of government was needed. Press attacks, such as that described, played a decisive part in achieving this change, which was crucial to the war's outcome. The attack on Plender thus made a significant contribution to the Allied victory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信