{"title":"交互语言:设计标准和建议","authors":"Richard K. Moore, Walter Main","doi":"10.1145/1476589.1476620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algebraic languages currently available on time sharing systems can be divided into two categories: batchoriented languages and conversational languages. The batch languages (ALGOL, FORTRAN, PL/1:, though quite powerful in their ability to express complicated algorithms, are in many ways unsuited to an interactive environment.","PeriodicalId":294588,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1899-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interactive languages: design criteria and a proposal\",\"authors\":\"Richard K. Moore, Walter Main\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1476589.1476620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Algebraic languages currently available on time sharing systems can be divided into two categories: batchoriented languages and conversational languages. The batch languages (ALGOL, FORTRAN, PL/1:, though quite powerful in their ability to express complicated algorithms, are in many ways unsuited to an interactive environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1899-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1476589.1476620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1476589.1476620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interactive languages: design criteria and a proposal
Algebraic languages currently available on time sharing systems can be divided into two categories: batchoriented languages and conversational languages. The batch languages (ALGOL, FORTRAN, PL/1:, though quite powerful in their ability to express complicated algorithms, are in many ways unsuited to an interactive environment.