柑橘酱(Pachyrhizus Erosus L)的物理化学和感官特征,在不同的浓度中加入果胶和柠檬酸

Arif Prashadi Santosa, Oetami Dwi Hajoeningtijas, Ismi Noviandita
{"title":"柑橘酱(Pachyrhizus Erosus L)的物理化学和感官特征,在不同的浓度中加入果胶和柠檬酸","authors":"Arif Prashadi Santosa, Oetami Dwi Hajoeningtijas, Ismi Noviandita","doi":"10.30595/pspfs.v2i.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to figure out the effect of differences in concentration of citric acidand pectin and their interactions on the content of proximate and sensory of jam.The research was conducted using a completely randomized design (CRD) with a factorial pattern consisting of two factors.The first factor was the comparison of thethree levels of citric acid (A) concentration:1% (A1), 2% (A2),and 3% (A3) of the total ingredients for making jam.The second factor was pectin concentration (P) in 4 levels: 0.83%(P1), 1.0% (P2), 1.17% (P3), and 1.34% (P4) of the total ingredients for making jam.The chemical parameters tested included moisture content, fiber content, ash content, and antioxidant, while the physical parameters included pH and viscosity.The sensory test assessments includedaroma, taste, color, preference, and spreadability.The results indicated that the comparison of the concentration of citric acid (A) had a significant effect on the proximate analysis of the pH variable; however, it had no significant effect on several other variables:moisture content, crude fiber content, ash content, viscosity, and antioxidant.The results of the sensory test did not significantly affect the variables of aroma, taste, color, preference, and spreadability.In addition, the treatment of pectin (P)concentration ratio had a significant effect toward proximate analysis on water content and viscosity variable, but it had no significant effect on the variables offiber content, ash content, pH, and antioxidant.Meanwhile, the sensory test had a significant effect on the preference variable and had no significant effect on the aroma, taste, color, and spreadibilityvariables.The treatment interactions (AxP) significantly affectedproximate analysis on pH and viscosity variables.However, it did not affect the variable of water content, fiber content, ash content, and antioxidantsignificantly.The sensory test results hada significant effect onpreference variable.The best treatment wason the use of 1% citric acid concentration and 0.83% pectin concentration (A1P1) with 42.63% water content, 37.54% fiber content, 0.25% ash content, pH of 3.30, a viscosity of 8.49 cP, and an antioxidant of 9.22%.The treatment resulted in the aroma of 3.67 (delicious), taste of 4.67 (delicious), color of 4.00 (yellowish white), preference of 5.00 (likevery much), and spreadability 3.67 (easy). ","PeriodicalId":165554,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Series on Physical & Formal Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Karakteristik Fisikokimia dan Sensoris Selai Bengkuang (Pachyrhizus Erosus L.) dengan Penambahan Pektin dan Asam Sitrat pada Berbagai Konsentrasi\",\"authors\":\"Arif Prashadi Santosa, Oetami Dwi Hajoeningtijas, Ismi Noviandita\",\"doi\":\"10.30595/pspfs.v2i.170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aimed to figure out the effect of differences in concentration of citric acidand pectin and their interactions on the content of proximate and sensory of jam.The research was conducted using a completely randomized design (CRD) with a factorial pattern consisting of two factors.The first factor was the comparison of thethree levels of citric acid (A) concentration:1% (A1), 2% (A2),and 3% (A3) of the total ingredients for making jam.The second factor was pectin concentration (P) in 4 levels: 0.83%(P1), 1.0% (P2), 1.17% (P3), and 1.34% (P4) of the total ingredients for making jam.The chemical parameters tested included moisture content, fiber content, ash content, and antioxidant, while the physical parameters included pH and viscosity.The sensory test assessments includedaroma, taste, color, preference, and spreadability.The results indicated that the comparison of the concentration of citric acid (A) had a significant effect on the proximate analysis of the pH variable; however, it had no significant effect on several other variables:moisture content, crude fiber content, ash content, viscosity, and antioxidant.The results of the sensory test did not significantly affect the variables of aroma, taste, color, preference, and spreadability.In addition, the treatment of pectin (P)concentration ratio had a significant effect toward proximate analysis on water content and viscosity variable, but it had no significant effect on the variables offiber content, ash content, pH, and antioxidant.Meanwhile, the sensory test had a significant effect on the preference variable and had no significant effect on the aroma, taste, color, and spreadibilityvariables.The treatment interactions (AxP) significantly affectedproximate analysis on pH and viscosity variables.However, it did not affect the variable of water content, fiber content, ash content, and antioxidantsignificantly.The sensory test results hada significant effect onpreference variable.The best treatment wason the use of 1% citric acid concentration and 0.83% pectin concentration (A1P1) with 42.63% water content, 37.54% fiber content, 0.25% ash content, pH of 3.30, a viscosity of 8.49 cP, and an antioxidant of 9.22%.The treatment resulted in the aroma of 3.67 (delicious), taste of 4.67 (delicious), color of 4.00 (yellowish white), preference of 5.00 (likevery much), and spreadability 3.67 (easy). \",\"PeriodicalId\":165554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Series on Physical & Formal Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Series on Physical & Formal Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30595/pspfs.v2i.170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Series on Physical & Formal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/pspfs.v2i.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在研究柠檬酸和果胶浓度的差异及其相互作用对果酱近感和感官含量的影响。本研究采用完全随机设计(CRD),因子模式由两个因素组成。第一个因素是比较三种水平的柠檬酸(A)浓度:1% (A1), 2% (A2)和3% (A3)的总配料制作果酱。第二个影响因素是果胶浓度(P),分别占果酱总配料的0.83%(P1)、1.0% (P2)、1.17% (P3)、1.34% (P4)。化学参数包括水分含量、纤维含量、灰分含量和抗氧化剂,物理参数包括pH值和粘度。感官测试评估包括肿瘤、味道、颜色、偏好和可涂抹性。结果表明,柠檬酸(A)浓度的比较对pH变量的近似分析有显著影响;但对水分含量、粗纤维含量、灰分含量、粘度和抗氧化剂等指标无显著影响。感官测试的结果对香气、味道、颜色、偏好和铺展性等变量没有显著影响。此外,果胶(P)浓度比处理对水分含量和黏度变量的近似分析有显著影响,但对纤维含量、灰分含量、pH和抗氧化剂变量的影响不显著。同时,感官测试对偏好变量有显著影响,而对香气、味道、颜色和可展性变量无显著影响。处理相互作用(AxP)显著影响pH和粘度变量的近似分析。但对水分含量、纤维含量、灰分含量、抗氧化性等指标影响不显著。感官测试结果对偏好变量有显著影响。最佳处理为柠檬酸浓度为1%,果胶浓度为0.83% (A1P1),水含量为42.63%,纤维含量为37.54%,灰分含量为0.25%,pH为3.30,粘度为8.49 cP,抗氧化剂为9.22%。经处理后,其香气为3.67(好吃),口感为4.67(好吃),颜色为4.00(黄白色),喜好度为5.00(非常喜欢),涂抹性为3.67(容易)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Karakteristik Fisikokimia dan Sensoris Selai Bengkuang (Pachyrhizus Erosus L.) dengan Penambahan Pektin dan Asam Sitrat pada Berbagai Konsentrasi
This research aimed to figure out the effect of differences in concentration of citric acidand pectin and their interactions on the content of proximate and sensory of jam.The research was conducted using a completely randomized design (CRD) with a factorial pattern consisting of two factors.The first factor was the comparison of thethree levels of citric acid (A) concentration:1% (A1), 2% (A2),and 3% (A3) of the total ingredients for making jam.The second factor was pectin concentration (P) in 4 levels: 0.83%(P1), 1.0% (P2), 1.17% (P3), and 1.34% (P4) of the total ingredients for making jam.The chemical parameters tested included moisture content, fiber content, ash content, and antioxidant, while the physical parameters included pH and viscosity.The sensory test assessments includedaroma, taste, color, preference, and spreadability.The results indicated that the comparison of the concentration of citric acid (A) had a significant effect on the proximate analysis of the pH variable; however, it had no significant effect on several other variables:moisture content, crude fiber content, ash content, viscosity, and antioxidant.The results of the sensory test did not significantly affect the variables of aroma, taste, color, preference, and spreadability.In addition, the treatment of pectin (P)concentration ratio had a significant effect toward proximate analysis on water content and viscosity variable, but it had no significant effect on the variables offiber content, ash content, pH, and antioxidant.Meanwhile, the sensory test had a significant effect on the preference variable and had no significant effect on the aroma, taste, color, and spreadibilityvariables.The treatment interactions (AxP) significantly affectedproximate analysis on pH and viscosity variables.However, it did not affect the variable of water content, fiber content, ash content, and antioxidantsignificantly.The sensory test results hada significant effect onpreference variable.The best treatment wason the use of 1% citric acid concentration and 0.83% pectin concentration (A1P1) with 42.63% water content, 37.54% fiber content, 0.25% ash content, pH of 3.30, a viscosity of 8.49 cP, and an antioxidant of 9.22%.The treatment resulted in the aroma of 3.67 (delicious), taste of 4.67 (delicious), color of 4.00 (yellowish white), preference of 5.00 (likevery much), and spreadability 3.67 (easy). 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信