帮助找到“丢失的钱”:半拉格朗日方法应用于电力市场,根据参与容量支付

V. Araoz, K. Jørnsten
{"title":"帮助找到“丢失的钱”:半拉格朗日方法应用于电力市场,根据参与容量支付","authors":"V. Araoz, K. Jørnsten","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2012.6254654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One peculiarity of the wholesale electricity market that seems persistent across some market designs is the ”missing money” problem. This problem appears when generators do not recover their costs given the market price of electricity. The ”missing money” problem may be in part due to the pricing and payment mechanisms set in place. Competitive forces should set the price of a commodity to the marginal cost of the marginal unit producing the good if the functions are convex. However, electricity markets are characterised for having non-convex function due to the generators' minimum and maximum outputs constraints, start up and shut down costs, amongst other characteristics. Therefore, uniform marginal price schemes will not always create market-clearing price. Under this scheme, not all the generators will cover the costs incurred in production. Different recovery mechanisms have been proposes, but the case of the ”missing money” is still a challenge these days, especially in pool-based markets. A possible solution is to price for capacity as well as for the electricity. Capacity markets have developed, and they still are in progress. And although some authors are not supporters of capacity payments and capacity markets, some others have shown the need for capacity payments and suggested a design for its market. This paper contributes to the growing literature in capacity pricing by suggesting a new approach to obtain electricity prices and capacity prices for the plants engaged into production. This approach applies the semi-Lagrangean methodology to an expanded Unit Commitment and Dispatch Problem. The expanded problem includes an extra constraint that sets the total capacity engaged to its optimal value. The new semi-Lagrangean problem is solved by using a subgradient approach. We obtain a set of prices for electricity and capacity that are high enough to cover the generators' costs, as well as sending the right signals to the market, and producing efficiently at a minimum costs. We believe that the excess revenue obtained with this approach can be used as a guide to future investment, and as a consequence, can help to find the ”missing money”.","PeriodicalId":383754,"journal":{"name":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Helping to find the ”missing money”: Semi-lagrangean approach applied to electricity markets with payments for engaged capacity\",\"authors\":\"V. Araoz, K. Jørnsten\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2012.6254654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One peculiarity of the wholesale electricity market that seems persistent across some market designs is the ”missing money” problem. This problem appears when generators do not recover their costs given the market price of electricity. The ”missing money” problem may be in part due to the pricing and payment mechanisms set in place. Competitive forces should set the price of a commodity to the marginal cost of the marginal unit producing the good if the functions are convex. However, electricity markets are characterised for having non-convex function due to the generators' minimum and maximum outputs constraints, start up and shut down costs, amongst other characteristics. Therefore, uniform marginal price schemes will not always create market-clearing price. Under this scheme, not all the generators will cover the costs incurred in production. Different recovery mechanisms have been proposes, but the case of the ”missing money” is still a challenge these days, especially in pool-based markets. A possible solution is to price for capacity as well as for the electricity. Capacity markets have developed, and they still are in progress. And although some authors are not supporters of capacity payments and capacity markets, some others have shown the need for capacity payments and suggested a design for its market. This paper contributes to the growing literature in capacity pricing by suggesting a new approach to obtain electricity prices and capacity prices for the plants engaged into production. This approach applies the semi-Lagrangean methodology to an expanded Unit Commitment and Dispatch Problem. The expanded problem includes an extra constraint that sets the total capacity engaged to its optimal value. The new semi-Lagrangean problem is solved by using a subgradient approach. We obtain a set of prices for electricity and capacity that are high enough to cover the generators' costs, as well as sending the right signals to the market, and producing efficiently at a minimum costs. We believe that the excess revenue obtained with this approach can be used as a guide to future investment, and as a consequence, can help to find the ”missing money”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

批发电力市场的一个特点似乎一直存在于一些市场设计中,那就是“缺钱”问题。当发电机组在给定电力市场价格的情况下无法收回成本时,就会出现这个问题。“缺钱”问题的部分原因可能在于定价和支付机制。如果函数是凸函数,那么竞争力量应该将商品的价格设定为生产该商品的边际单位的边际成本。然而,由于发电机的最小和最大输出限制、启动和关闭成本以及其他特征,电力市场的特点是非凸函数。因此,统一边际价格方案并不总能产生市场出清价格。在这一计划下,并非所有发电机都能支付生产过程中产生的费用。人们提出了不同的追回机制,但“钱不见了”的情况如今仍是一个挑战,尤其是在以资金池为基础的市场。一个可能的解决方案是根据容量和电力定价。产能市场已经发展起来,而且仍在发展中。尽管有些作者并不支持能力支付和能力市场,但其他一些作者已经证明了能力支付的必要性,并提出了一种能力支付市场的设计方案。本文通过提出一种新的方法来获取参与生产的电厂的电价和容量价格,从而为不断增长的容量定价文献做出贡献。该方法将半拉格朗日方法应用于扩展的单元承诺和调度问题。扩展后的问题包括一个额外的约束,该约束将总容量设置为最优值。利用次梯度法求解了新的半拉格朗日问题。我们得到了一套足够高的电价和容量,既能覆盖发电商的成本,又能向市场发出正确的信号,以最低的成本高效地发电。我们相信,通过这种方式获得的超额收益可以作为未来投资的指导,从而可以帮助找到“丢失的钱”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Helping to find the ”missing money”: Semi-lagrangean approach applied to electricity markets with payments for engaged capacity
One peculiarity of the wholesale electricity market that seems persistent across some market designs is the ”missing money” problem. This problem appears when generators do not recover their costs given the market price of electricity. The ”missing money” problem may be in part due to the pricing and payment mechanisms set in place. Competitive forces should set the price of a commodity to the marginal cost of the marginal unit producing the good if the functions are convex. However, electricity markets are characterised for having non-convex function due to the generators' minimum and maximum outputs constraints, start up and shut down costs, amongst other characteristics. Therefore, uniform marginal price schemes will not always create market-clearing price. Under this scheme, not all the generators will cover the costs incurred in production. Different recovery mechanisms have been proposes, but the case of the ”missing money” is still a challenge these days, especially in pool-based markets. A possible solution is to price for capacity as well as for the electricity. Capacity markets have developed, and they still are in progress. And although some authors are not supporters of capacity payments and capacity markets, some others have shown the need for capacity payments and suggested a design for its market. This paper contributes to the growing literature in capacity pricing by suggesting a new approach to obtain electricity prices and capacity prices for the plants engaged into production. This approach applies the semi-Lagrangean methodology to an expanded Unit Commitment and Dispatch Problem. The expanded problem includes an extra constraint that sets the total capacity engaged to its optimal value. The new semi-Lagrangean problem is solved by using a subgradient approach. We obtain a set of prices for electricity and capacity that are high enough to cover the generators' costs, as well as sending the right signals to the market, and producing efficiently at a minimum costs. We believe that the excess revenue obtained with this approach can be used as a guide to future investment, and as a consequence, can help to find the ”missing money”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信