SVM、NBC和KNN分类方法在SMK N02 Manokwari学生专业选择中的比较

Siska Howay, S. Suhirman
{"title":"SVM、NBC和KNN分类方法在SMK N02 Manokwari学生专业选择中的比较","authors":"Siska Howay, S. Suhirman","doi":"10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stages of choosing a major for prospective SMK students are rarely the beginning of the next career determination. The determination of the major aims to make students more directed in receiving lessons based on the abilities and talents of the students, and, of course, when the student graduates, they already have the skills to get a job if they do not continue their education to college. The method used in this study is data mining techniques. But not all data mining algorithms perform well in classifying the selection of interest paths at the SMK level. Therefore, this study will discuss the comparative analysis of the performance level of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithm and the Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Comparison of NBC, KNN and SVM methods was measured using feeding accuracy for the KNN method to get an accuracy of 54.56%, then for the NBC method to get an accuracy of 74.78%, and the SVM method to get an accuracy of 58.70%. Then it can be concluded that the three methods, based on the attributes used by the NBC method, got high accuracy, which is 74.78%.","PeriodicalId":417206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of SVM, NBC, and KNN Classification Methods in Determining Students’ Majors at SMK N02 Manokwari\",\"authors\":\"Siska Howay, S. Suhirman\",\"doi\":\"10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The stages of choosing a major for prospective SMK students are rarely the beginning of the next career determination. The determination of the major aims to make students more directed in receiving lessons based on the abilities and talents of the students, and, of course, when the student graduates, they already have the skills to get a job if they do not continue their education to college. The method used in this study is data mining techniques. But not all data mining algorithms perform well in classifying the selection of interest paths at the SMK level. Therefore, this study will discuss the comparative analysis of the performance level of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithm and the Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Comparison of NBC, KNN and SVM methods was measured using feeding accuracy for the KNN method to get an accuracy of 54.56%, then for the NBC method to get an accuracy of 74.78%, and the SVM method to get an accuracy of 58.70%. Then it can be concluded that the three methods, based on the attributes used by the NBC method, got high accuracy, which is 74.78%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于未来的SMK学生来说,选择专业的阶段很少是下一个职业决定的开始。专业的确定是为了让学生更有针对性地接受基于学生能力和才能的课程,当然,当学生毕业时,如果他们没有继续他们的教育到大学,他们已经拥有了找工作的技能。本研究使用的方法是数据挖掘技术。但并不是所有的数据挖掘算法都能很好地在SMK级别对兴趣路径的选择进行分类。因此,本研究将讨论支持向量机(SVM)分类算法与Naïve贝叶斯分类器(NBC)和k近邻(KNN)的性能水平的比较分析。比较NBC、KNN和SVM三种方法,首先采用进料精度进行测量,其中KNN方法的进料精度为54.56%,其次NBC方法的进料精度为74.78%,SVM方法的进料精度为58.70%。结果表明,基于NBC方法所使用的属性,三种方法均获得了较高的准确率,达到74.78%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of SVM, NBC, and KNN Classification Methods in Determining Students’ Majors at SMK N02 Manokwari
The stages of choosing a major for prospective SMK students are rarely the beginning of the next career determination. The determination of the major aims to make students more directed in receiving lessons based on the abilities and talents of the students, and, of course, when the student graduates, they already have the skills to get a job if they do not continue their education to college. The method used in this study is data mining techniques. But not all data mining algorithms perform well in classifying the selection of interest paths at the SMK level. Therefore, this study will discuss the comparative analysis of the performance level of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithm and the Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Comparison of NBC, KNN and SVM methods was measured using feeding accuracy for the KNN method to get an accuracy of 54.56%, then for the NBC method to get an accuracy of 74.78%, and the SVM method to get an accuracy of 58.70%. Then it can be concluded that the three methods, based on the attributes used by the NBC method, got high accuracy, which is 74.78%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信