的Crypto-Security

P. Hacker, C. Thomale
{"title":"的Crypto-Security","authors":"P. Hacker, C. Thomale","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198842187.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyses the interplay between initial coin offerings (‘ICOs’) and securities regulation, with a particular focus on EU law. ICOs have come to dwarf traditional venture capital funding in the blockchain space. However, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’) has determined that a number of token types constitute securities under US law, with potentially far-reaching consequences for initiators in terms of liability. Under EU law, explicit regulatory or court guidance is lacking at the moment. Against this background, this chapter develops a taxonomy of tokens by differentiating between investment, utility, and currency tokens. It shows that only investment tokens typically qualify as securities under EU law. Currency tokens are exempted because of their proximity to payment services regulation; and utility tokens will, for the most part, fall under EU consumer law, not securities regulation. These results derive from a functional analysis of EU securities regulation and arguably amount to a comparative advantage of EU law vis-à-vis US law in terms of the regulatory burden for token developers.","PeriodicalId":205528,"journal":{"name":"Regulating Blockchain","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Crypto-Security\",\"authors\":\"P. Hacker, C. Thomale\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198842187.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter analyses the interplay between initial coin offerings (‘ICOs’) and securities regulation, with a particular focus on EU law. ICOs have come to dwarf traditional venture capital funding in the blockchain space. However, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’) has determined that a number of token types constitute securities under US law, with potentially far-reaching consequences for initiators in terms of liability. Under EU law, explicit regulatory or court guidance is lacking at the moment. Against this background, this chapter develops a taxonomy of tokens by differentiating between investment, utility, and currency tokens. It shows that only investment tokens typically qualify as securities under EU law. Currency tokens are exempted because of their proximity to payment services regulation; and utility tokens will, for the most part, fall under EU consumer law, not securities regulation. These results derive from a functional analysis of EU securities regulation and arguably amount to a comparative advantage of EU law vis-à-vis US law in terms of the regulatory burden for token developers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulating Blockchain\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulating Blockchain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198842187.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulating Blockchain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198842187.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章分析了首次代币发行(ICOs)与证券监管之间的相互作用,特别关注欧盟法律。ico已经让区块链领域的传统风险投资相形见绌。然而,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)已经确定,根据美国法律,许多代币类型构成证券,在责任方面可能对发起人产生深远的影响。根据欧盟法律,目前缺乏明确的监管或法院指导。在此背景下,本章通过区分投资代币、公用事业代币和货币代币,对代币进行了分类。它表明,根据欧盟法律,只有投资代币通常才有资格成为证券。货币代币因其接近支付服务监管而获得豁免;在很大程度上,实用型代币将属于欧盟消费者法,而不是证券监管。这些结果源于对欧盟证券监管的功能分析,可以说在代币开发商的监管负担方面,欧盟法律相对于-à-vis美国法律具有比较优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Crypto-Security
This chapter analyses the interplay between initial coin offerings (‘ICOs’) and securities regulation, with a particular focus on EU law. ICOs have come to dwarf traditional venture capital funding in the blockchain space. However, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’) has determined that a number of token types constitute securities under US law, with potentially far-reaching consequences for initiators in terms of liability. Under EU law, explicit regulatory or court guidance is lacking at the moment. Against this background, this chapter develops a taxonomy of tokens by differentiating between investment, utility, and currency tokens. It shows that only investment tokens typically qualify as securities under EU law. Currency tokens are exempted because of their proximity to payment services regulation; and utility tokens will, for the most part, fall under EU consumer law, not securities regulation. These results derive from a functional analysis of EU securities regulation and arguably amount to a comparative advantage of EU law vis-à-vis US law in terms of the regulatory burden for token developers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信