{"title":"使用Cyclegan估算一个地区的雨量","authors":"Sergey Timinsky, H. Habi, J. Ostrometzky","doi":"10.1109/ICASSPW59220.2023.10192962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last couple of years, supervised machine learning (ML) methods have shown state-of-the-art results for near-ground rain estimation. Information is usually obtained from two kinds of sensors - rain gauges, which measure rain rate, and commercial microwave links (CMLs) which measure attenuation. These data sources are paired to create a dataset on which a model is trained. The arising problem of such methods of training is in the need for the datasets to be constructed with a CML-rain gauge pairing relation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for rain estimation using a training method that does not require a matching between a CML and a rain gauge. Our goal is to infer the relation between CML measurements to rain rate values, with a data-driven approach using an unpaired dataset. We achieve this by inducing two cycle-consistency losses that capture the intuition that if we translate from attenuation measurements to rain rate observations and back again - we should arrive at where we started. Moreover, we learn two mapping functions translating between A (attenuation) and R (rain-rate), denoted by $G: \\mathcal{A} \\rightarrow \\mathcal{R}$ and $F: \\mathcal{R} \\rightarrow \\mathcal{A}$. No information is provided as to which sample in, $\\mathcal{A}$ matches which sample in $\\mathcal{R}$. We demonstrate our results using estimated accumulated rain predictions and validate them with a nearby rain gauge station.","PeriodicalId":158726,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rain Estimation Over a Region Using Cyclegan\",\"authors\":\"Sergey Timinsky, H. Habi, J. Ostrometzky\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICASSPW59220.2023.10192962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last couple of years, supervised machine learning (ML) methods have shown state-of-the-art results for near-ground rain estimation. Information is usually obtained from two kinds of sensors - rain gauges, which measure rain rate, and commercial microwave links (CMLs) which measure attenuation. These data sources are paired to create a dataset on which a model is trained. The arising problem of such methods of training is in the need for the datasets to be constructed with a CML-rain gauge pairing relation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for rain estimation using a training method that does not require a matching between a CML and a rain gauge. Our goal is to infer the relation between CML measurements to rain rate values, with a data-driven approach using an unpaired dataset. We achieve this by inducing two cycle-consistency losses that capture the intuition that if we translate from attenuation measurements to rain rate observations and back again - we should arrive at where we started. Moreover, we learn two mapping functions translating between A (attenuation) and R (rain-rate), denoted by $G: \\\\mathcal{A} \\\\rightarrow \\\\mathcal{R}$ and $F: \\\\mathcal{R} \\\\rightarrow \\\\mathcal{A}$. No information is provided as to which sample in, $\\\\mathcal{A}$ matches which sample in $\\\\mathcal{R}$. We demonstrate our results using estimated accumulated rain predictions and validate them with a nearby rain gauge station.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSPW59220.2023.10192962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSPW59220.2023.10192962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the last couple of years, supervised machine learning (ML) methods have shown state-of-the-art results for near-ground rain estimation. Information is usually obtained from two kinds of sensors - rain gauges, which measure rain rate, and commercial microwave links (CMLs) which measure attenuation. These data sources are paired to create a dataset on which a model is trained. The arising problem of such methods of training is in the need for the datasets to be constructed with a CML-rain gauge pairing relation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for rain estimation using a training method that does not require a matching between a CML and a rain gauge. Our goal is to infer the relation between CML measurements to rain rate values, with a data-driven approach using an unpaired dataset. We achieve this by inducing two cycle-consistency losses that capture the intuition that if we translate from attenuation measurements to rain rate observations and back again - we should arrive at where we started. Moreover, we learn two mapping functions translating between A (attenuation) and R (rain-rate), denoted by $G: \mathcal{A} \rightarrow \mathcal{R}$ and $F: \mathcal{R} \rightarrow \mathcal{A}$. No information is provided as to which sample in, $\mathcal{A}$ matches which sample in $\mathcal{R}$. We demonstrate our results using estimated accumulated rain predictions and validate them with a nearby rain gauge station.