{"title":"工作整合学习和人文:可能性和未来方向","authors":"C. Pocknee, Gabriella Pretto","doi":"10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/V09I10/43351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2008, in response to government, industry and community demand, Australia completed its first large scale scoping study of Work Integrated Learning (WIL) curriculum in contemporary Australian higher education. The aim of the WIL project was to document and scope current WIL practices nationally, and identify ways to improve the educational experience of students, in order to produce more industry focused, work ready graduates (Patrick et al., 2008). The project, which was government funded and included 37 of Australia's 39 universities, found that all of those who participated in the study saw real value in adopting a more industry focused curricula, however, it also revealed that many were still grappling with selecting from the range of options available, and finding the most appropriate way of integrating them into courses. Traditional disciplines such as nursing, medicine, education and engineering have always had an embedded work integrated learning component in their curriculum, usually in the form of industry placements, but many disciplines, in non-traditional areas such as the liberal arts, were new to this concept of WIL and unsure of how to customise programs to meet the needs of their particular discipline. To address this issue, a series of narratives or vignettes were developed and compiled to provide insight into not only to the diverse range of pedagogical practices in the area, but also offer practical advice on how to establish, develop and manage programs in an innovative and sustainable way. This paper analyses more closely the Australian research on embedding WIL in non-traditional areas and highlights a number of key vignettes that offer significant insights into possible future directions for the Humanities as they come to terms with this challenge.","PeriodicalId":400979,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Humanities","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work integrated learning and the humanities: possibilities and future directions\",\"authors\":\"C. Pocknee, Gabriella Pretto\",\"doi\":\"10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/V09I10/43351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2008, in response to government, industry and community demand, Australia completed its first large scale scoping study of Work Integrated Learning (WIL) curriculum in contemporary Australian higher education. The aim of the WIL project was to document and scope current WIL practices nationally, and identify ways to improve the educational experience of students, in order to produce more industry focused, work ready graduates (Patrick et al., 2008). The project, which was government funded and included 37 of Australia's 39 universities, found that all of those who participated in the study saw real value in adopting a more industry focused curricula, however, it also revealed that many were still grappling with selecting from the range of options available, and finding the most appropriate way of integrating them into courses. Traditional disciplines such as nursing, medicine, education and engineering have always had an embedded work integrated learning component in their curriculum, usually in the form of industry placements, but many disciplines, in non-traditional areas such as the liberal arts, were new to this concept of WIL and unsure of how to customise programs to meet the needs of their particular discipline. To address this issue, a series of narratives or vignettes were developed and compiled to provide insight into not only to the diverse range of pedagogical practices in the area, but also offer practical advice on how to establish, develop and manage programs in an innovative and sustainable way. This paper analyses more closely the Australian research on embedding WIL in non-traditional areas and highlights a number of key vignettes that offer significant insights into possible future directions for the Humanities as they come to terms with this challenge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":400979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Humanities\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/V09I10/43351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/V09I10/43351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
2008年,为响应政府、行业和社区的需求,澳大利亚在当代澳大利亚高等教育中完成了第一次大规模的工作整合学习(Work Integrated Learning, WIL)课程范围研究。WIL项目的目的是记录和界定目前全国范围内的WIL实践,并确定改善学生教育体验的方法,以培养更多专注于行业、准备工作的毕业生(Patrick et al., 2008)。该项目由政府资助,涵盖了澳大利亚39所大学中的37所。研究发现,所有参与研究的大学都看到了采用更加以行业为重点的课程的真正价值,然而,研究也显示,许多大学仍在努力从一系列可用的选项中进行选择,并找到将它们整合到课程中的最合适方式。传统学科,如护理、医学、教育和工程,在他们的课程中总是有一个嵌入式的工作集成学习部分,通常以行业实习的形式,但许多学科,在非传统领域,如文科,对这种工学结合的概念是新的,不确定如何定制课程来满足他们特定学科的需求。为了解决这个问题,我们编写了一系列的叙述或小插曲,不仅为该地区多样化的教学实践提供了见解,而且还为如何以创新和可持续的方式建立、发展和管理项目提供了实用的建议。本文更密切地分析了澳大利亚在非传统领域嵌入人工智能的研究,并强调了一些关键的小片段,这些小片段为人文学科在应对这一挑战时可能的未来方向提供了重要的见解。
Work integrated learning and the humanities: possibilities and future directions
In 2008, in response to government, industry and community demand, Australia completed its first large scale scoping study of Work Integrated Learning (WIL) curriculum in contemporary Australian higher education. The aim of the WIL project was to document and scope current WIL practices nationally, and identify ways to improve the educational experience of students, in order to produce more industry focused, work ready graduates (Patrick et al., 2008). The project, which was government funded and included 37 of Australia's 39 universities, found that all of those who participated in the study saw real value in adopting a more industry focused curricula, however, it also revealed that many were still grappling with selecting from the range of options available, and finding the most appropriate way of integrating them into courses. Traditional disciplines such as nursing, medicine, education and engineering have always had an embedded work integrated learning component in their curriculum, usually in the form of industry placements, but many disciplines, in non-traditional areas such as the liberal arts, were new to this concept of WIL and unsure of how to customise programs to meet the needs of their particular discipline. To address this issue, a series of narratives or vignettes were developed and compiled to provide insight into not only to the diverse range of pedagogical practices in the area, but also offer practical advice on how to establish, develop and manage programs in an innovative and sustainable way. This paper analyses more closely the Australian research on embedding WIL in non-traditional areas and highlights a number of key vignettes that offer significant insights into possible future directions for the Humanities as they come to terms with this challenge.