颈动脉磁共振成像中管腔和血管壁测量的可重复性

J. Roberts, Seong-Eun Kim, H. Yoon, J. McNally, J. Hadley, L. Findeiss, G. Treiman, D. Parker
{"title":"颈动脉磁共振成像中管腔和血管壁测量的可重复性","authors":"J. Roberts, Seong-Eun Kim, H. Yoon, J. McNally, J. Hadley, L. Findeiss, G. Treiman, D. Parker","doi":"10.2174/1876533501205010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease is estimated to represent the etiology for one quarter of all strokes. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography are promising tools in the evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vascular disease. In this study, we evaluate the reliability of high resolution carotid wall magnetic resonance (MR) imaging by investigating the inter-observer, intra-observer, and inter-scan variability in measurements of carotid vessel total lumen area and mean wall thickness. This HIPAA compliant study received IRB approval and all subjects gave written informed consent. Nineteen subjects were imaged on a 3T MRI scanner with custom-built 4-element receive-only phased-array coils optimized for carotid anatomy. Three observers manually drew regions of interest around the lumen and outer wall for both left and right carotid arteries. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) showed excellent agreement between Observer 1 and the others (>0.92). A two- way analysis of variance (ANOVA) found no significant difference between observers (p>0.05). Intra-observer variability for Observer 1 was measured by coefficient of variation (CV) with 0.03 for total lumen area and 0.03 for mean wall thickness. Similarly, the inter-scan variability of Observer 1 was found by CV to be 0.05±0.02 for total lumen area and 0.04±0.03 for mean wall thickness. Our results demonstrate that the MR measurements of total lumen area and mean wall thickness are highly reproducible and provide a reliable foundation for the evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vascular disease.","PeriodicalId":238767,"journal":{"name":"The Open Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of Lumen and Vessel Wall Measurements in Carotid Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"authors\":\"J. Roberts, Seong-Eun Kim, H. Yoon, J. McNally, J. Hadley, L. Findeiss, G. Treiman, D. Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876533501205010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease is estimated to represent the etiology for one quarter of all strokes. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography are promising tools in the evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vascular disease. In this study, we evaluate the reliability of high resolution carotid wall magnetic resonance (MR) imaging by investigating the inter-observer, intra-observer, and inter-scan variability in measurements of carotid vessel total lumen area and mean wall thickness. This HIPAA compliant study received IRB approval and all subjects gave written informed consent. Nineteen subjects were imaged on a 3T MRI scanner with custom-built 4-element receive-only phased-array coils optimized for carotid anatomy. Three observers manually drew regions of interest around the lumen and outer wall for both left and right carotid arteries. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) showed excellent agreement between Observer 1 and the others (>0.92). A two- way analysis of variance (ANOVA) found no significant difference between observers (p>0.05). Intra-observer variability for Observer 1 was measured by coefficient of variation (CV) with 0.03 for total lumen area and 0.03 for mean wall thickness. Similarly, the inter-scan variability of Observer 1 was found by CV to be 0.05±0.02 for total lumen area and 0.04±0.03 for mean wall thickness. Our results demonstrate that the MR measurements of total lumen area and mean wall thickness are highly reproducible and provide a reliable foundation for the evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vascular disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876533501205010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876533501205010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

据估计,颈动脉粥样硬化性疾病占所有中风的四分之一。颈动脉磁共振成像和磁共振血管造影是评价颈动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病的有前途的工具。在这项研究中,我们通过研究观察者之间、观察者内部和扫描之间颈动脉血管总管腔面积和平均壁厚的测量变异性来评估高分辨率颈动脉壁磁共振(MR)成像的可靠性。这项符合HIPAA的研究获得了IRB的批准,所有受试者都给予了书面知情同意。19名受试者在3T MRI扫描仪上成像,该扫描仪采用定制的针对颈动脉解剖优化的4单元仅接收相控阵线圈。三名观察员手动绘制了左右颈动脉管腔和外壁周围感兴趣的区域。类内相关系数(ICC)在观察者1和其他观察者之间表现出极好的一致性(>0.92)。双向方差分析(ANOVA)发现观察者之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。观测者1的观察者内部变异性通过变异系数(CV)测量,总管腔面积为0.03,平均壁厚为0.03。同样,观察者1的扫描间变异性通过CV发现总管腔面积为0.05±0.02,平均壁厚为0.04±0.03。我们的研究结果表明,MR测量的总管腔面积和平均壁厚具有很高的重复性,为评估颈动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病提供了可靠的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproducibility of Lumen and Vessel Wall Measurements in Carotid Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease is estimated to represent the etiology for one quarter of all strokes. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography are promising tools in the evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vascular disease. In this study, we evaluate the reliability of high resolution carotid wall magnetic resonance (MR) imaging by investigating the inter-observer, intra-observer, and inter-scan variability in measurements of carotid vessel total lumen area and mean wall thickness. This HIPAA compliant study received IRB approval and all subjects gave written informed consent. Nineteen subjects were imaged on a 3T MRI scanner with custom-built 4-element receive-only phased-array coils optimized for carotid anatomy. Three observers manually drew regions of interest around the lumen and outer wall for both left and right carotid arteries. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) showed excellent agreement between Observer 1 and the others (>0.92). A two- way analysis of variance (ANOVA) found no significant difference between observers (p>0.05). Intra-observer variability for Observer 1 was measured by coefficient of variation (CV) with 0.03 for total lumen area and 0.03 for mean wall thickness. Similarly, the inter-scan variability of Observer 1 was found by CV to be 0.05±0.02 for total lumen area and 0.04±0.03 for mean wall thickness. Our results demonstrate that the MR measurements of total lumen area and mean wall thickness are highly reproducible and provide a reliable foundation for the evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vascular disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信