真性和解剖性内脏动脉瘤的治疗策略。

P. Keschenau, N. Kaisaris, H. Jalaie, J. Grommes, D. Kotelis, J. Kalder, M. Jacobs
{"title":"真性和解剖性内脏动脉瘤的治疗策略。","authors":"P. Keschenau, N. Kaisaris, H. Jalaie, J. Grommes, D. Kotelis, J. Kalder, M. Jacobs","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11036-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nVisceral artery aneurysms (VAA) are rare and the literature regarding management strategies is limited. The study aim was to evaluate our 13-year experience with VAA treatment including conservative, open surgical and endovascular therapy.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis retrospective single-center study included 37 patients (31 male, median age 70 years [46-79 years]) with true and dissecting VAA treated between January 2006 and December 2018. Indications for invasive therapy were ruptured (n=1) and symptomatic (n=8) VAA or asymptomatic VAA >20 mm (n=15). The decision on the treatment type was made after interdisciplinary (vascular surgeons/radiologists) discussion.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe aneurysms affected the celiac trunk (n=18, 49%), the splenic artery (n=11, 30%), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA, n=6, 16%), the hepatic artery (n=5, 14%) and proximal SMA side branches (n=2, 5%). Six patients had multiple VAA, one had an intrahepatic artery aneurysm and one had peripheral mesocolic artery aneurysms plus a VAA. 46% of the patients (n=17) had coexisting aneurysms in other vascular territories. Thirteen patients were managed conservatively (median VAA diameter 15 [14-25] mm), 18 underwent open surgery with venous or prosthetic bypass or interposition graft implantation and 6 were treated by endovascular means (coiling (n=3) or endograft (n=3)). Median follow-up (FU) was 21 months (4-123 months). In-hospital mortality was 0%. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (5-28 days) after surgical and 3 days (2-71 days) after endovascular treatment. Complications included an early type I endoleak, 3 secondary open abdominal surgeries for bleeding/peritonitis after endovascular treatment of a ruptured intrahepatic aneurysm, anasymptomatic aorto-truncal bypass occlusion and aneurysm recurrence after a venous SMA interposition graft. None of the conservatively treated VAA required invasive treatment during FU.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSmall (<20mm) asymptomatic VAA can be managed conservatively. Whenever invasive treatment is indicated, both open and endovascular treatments can be performed with low complication rates. In order to choose the optimal therapeutic approach, anatomical features and patient comorbidities should be considered and, ideally, discussed interdisciplinarily.","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management strategies for true and dissecting visceral artery aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"P. Keschenau, N. Kaisaris, H. Jalaie, J. Grommes, D. Kotelis, J. Kalder, M. Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11036-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nVisceral artery aneurysms (VAA) are rare and the literature regarding management strategies is limited. The study aim was to evaluate our 13-year experience with VAA treatment including conservative, open surgical and endovascular therapy.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis retrospective single-center study included 37 patients (31 male, median age 70 years [46-79 years]) with true and dissecting VAA treated between January 2006 and December 2018. Indications for invasive therapy were ruptured (n=1) and symptomatic (n=8) VAA or asymptomatic VAA >20 mm (n=15). The decision on the treatment type was made after interdisciplinary (vascular surgeons/radiologists) discussion.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe aneurysms affected the celiac trunk (n=18, 49%), the splenic artery (n=11, 30%), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA, n=6, 16%), the hepatic artery (n=5, 14%) and proximal SMA side branches (n=2, 5%). Six patients had multiple VAA, one had an intrahepatic artery aneurysm and one had peripheral mesocolic artery aneurysms plus a VAA. 46% of the patients (n=17) had coexisting aneurysms in other vascular territories. Thirteen patients were managed conservatively (median VAA diameter 15 [14-25] mm), 18 underwent open surgery with venous or prosthetic bypass or interposition graft implantation and 6 were treated by endovascular means (coiling (n=3) or endograft (n=3)). Median follow-up (FU) was 21 months (4-123 months). In-hospital mortality was 0%. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (5-28 days) after surgical and 3 days (2-71 days) after endovascular treatment. Complications included an early type I endoleak, 3 secondary open abdominal surgeries for bleeding/peritonitis after endovascular treatment of a ruptured intrahepatic aneurysm, anasymptomatic aorto-truncal bypass occlusion and aneurysm recurrence after a venous SMA interposition graft. None of the conservatively treated VAA required invasive treatment during FU.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nSmall (<20mm) asymptomatic VAA can be managed conservatively. Whenever invasive treatment is indicated, both open and endovascular treatments can be performed with low complication rates. In order to choose the optimal therapeutic approach, anatomical features and patient comorbidities should be considered and, ideally, discussed interdisciplinarily.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11036-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11036-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:内脏动脉瘤(VAA)是罕见的,关于治疗策略的文献有限。研究目的是评估我们13年来治疗VAA的经验,包括保守、开放手术和血管内治疗。方法本回顾性单中心研究纳入了2006年1月至2018年12月期间治疗的37例真性和解剖性VAA患者(男性31例,中位年龄70岁[46-79])。有创治疗指征为VAA破裂(n=1)和有症状(n=8)或无症状VAA bb0 20 mm (n=15)。治疗方式的决定是在跨学科(血管外科医生/放射科医生)讨论后做出的。结果腹腔干(18例,49%)、脾动脉(11例,30%)、肠系膜上动脉(SMA, 6例,16%)、肝动脉(5例,14%)及SMA近端侧支(2例,5%)为动脉瘤累及部位。6例患者有多发VAA, 1例有肝内动脉瘤,1例有外周结肠系膜动脉瘤并有VAA。46%的患者(n=17)在其他血管区域同时存在动脉瘤。13例患者保守治疗(VAA中位直径15 [14-25]mm), 18例患者行开放手术,静脉或假体旁路或间置移植物植入,6例患者行血管内手段(旋盘术(n=3)或血管内移植物(n=3))。中位随访(FU)为21个月(4 ~ 123个月)。住院死亡率为0%。手术后平均住院时间为11天(5-28天),血管内治疗后平均住院时间为3天(2-71天)。并发症包括1例早期I型内漏,3例因肝内动脉瘤破裂血管内治疗后出血/腹膜炎而继发腹部切开手术,无症状主动脉-截断搭桥闭塞和静脉SMA介入移植后动脉瘤复发。经保守治疗的VAA在FU期间均不需要有创治疗。结论小(<20mm)无症状VAA可保守治疗。无论何时需要侵入性治疗,开放和血管内治疗均可进行,并发症发生率低。为了选择最佳的治疗方法,应考虑解剖特征和患者合并症,最好是跨学科讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management strategies for true and dissecting visceral artery aneurysms.
BACKGROUND Visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) are rare and the literature regarding management strategies is limited. The study aim was to evaluate our 13-year experience with VAA treatment including conservative, open surgical and endovascular therapy. METHODS This retrospective single-center study included 37 patients (31 male, median age 70 years [46-79 years]) with true and dissecting VAA treated between January 2006 and December 2018. Indications for invasive therapy were ruptured (n=1) and symptomatic (n=8) VAA or asymptomatic VAA >20 mm (n=15). The decision on the treatment type was made after interdisciplinary (vascular surgeons/radiologists) discussion. RESULTS The aneurysms affected the celiac trunk (n=18, 49%), the splenic artery (n=11, 30%), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA, n=6, 16%), the hepatic artery (n=5, 14%) and proximal SMA side branches (n=2, 5%). Six patients had multiple VAA, one had an intrahepatic artery aneurysm and one had peripheral mesocolic artery aneurysms plus a VAA. 46% of the patients (n=17) had coexisting aneurysms in other vascular territories. Thirteen patients were managed conservatively (median VAA diameter 15 [14-25] mm), 18 underwent open surgery with venous or prosthetic bypass or interposition graft implantation and 6 were treated by endovascular means (coiling (n=3) or endograft (n=3)). Median follow-up (FU) was 21 months (4-123 months). In-hospital mortality was 0%. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (5-28 days) after surgical and 3 days (2-71 days) after endovascular treatment. Complications included an early type I endoleak, 3 secondary open abdominal surgeries for bleeding/peritonitis after endovascular treatment of a ruptured intrahepatic aneurysm, anasymptomatic aorto-truncal bypass occlusion and aneurysm recurrence after a venous SMA interposition graft. None of the conservatively treated VAA required invasive treatment during FU. CONCLUSIONS Small (<20mm) asymptomatic VAA can be managed conservatively. Whenever invasive treatment is indicated, both open and endovascular treatments can be performed with low complication rates. In order to choose the optimal therapeutic approach, anatomical features and patient comorbidities should be considered and, ideally, discussed interdisciplinarily.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信