通过对OWA算子的敏感性分析,获得不确定条件下的鲁棒决策

M. Zarghami, R. Ardakanian, F. Szidarovszky
{"title":"通过对OWA算子的敏感性分析,获得不确定条件下的鲁棒决策","authors":"M. Zarghami, R. Ardakanian, F. Szidarovszky","doi":"10.1109/MCDM.2007.369102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The successful design and application of the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) method as a decision making tool depends on the efficient computation of its order weights. The most popular methods for determining the order weights are the fuzzy linguistic quantifiers approach and the minimal variability methods which give different behavior patterns for OWA. These methods will be compared by using sensitivity analysis on the outputs of OWA with respect to the optimism degree of the decision maker. The theoretical results are illustrated in a water resources management problem. The fuzzy linguistic quantifiers approach gives more information about the behavior of the OWA outputs in comparison to the minimal variability method. However, in using the minimal variability method, the OWA has a linear behavior with respect to the optimism degree and therefore it has better computation efficiency. A simulation study is also reported in this paper, where the dependence of the optimal decision on the uncertainty level is examined. Also based on obtained sensitivity measure, a new combined measure of goodness has been defined to have more reliability in obtaining optimal solutions","PeriodicalId":306422,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obtaining robust decisions under uncertainty by sensitivity analysis on OWA operator\",\"authors\":\"M. Zarghami, R. Ardakanian, F. Szidarovszky\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MCDM.2007.369102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The successful design and application of the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) method as a decision making tool depends on the efficient computation of its order weights. The most popular methods for determining the order weights are the fuzzy linguistic quantifiers approach and the minimal variability methods which give different behavior patterns for OWA. These methods will be compared by using sensitivity analysis on the outputs of OWA with respect to the optimism degree of the decision maker. The theoretical results are illustrated in a water resources management problem. The fuzzy linguistic quantifiers approach gives more information about the behavior of the OWA outputs in comparison to the minimal variability method. However, in using the minimal variability method, the OWA has a linear behavior with respect to the optimism degree and therefore it has better computation efficiency. A simulation study is also reported in this paper, where the dependence of the optimal decision on the uncertainty level is examined. Also based on obtained sensitivity measure, a new combined measure of goodness has been defined to have more reliability in obtaining optimal solutions\",\"PeriodicalId\":306422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCDM.2007.369102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCDM.2007.369102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

有序加权平均(OWA)方法作为一种决策工具的成功设计和应用取决于其阶权的高效计算。最常用的确定顺序权重的方法是模糊语言量词方法和最小可变性方法,它们给出了OWA的不同行为模式。这些方法将通过对OWA的输出相对于决策者的乐观程度的敏感性分析进行比较。最后以一个水资源管理问题为例说明了理论结果。与最小可变性方法相比,模糊语言量词方法提供了更多关于OWA输出行为的信息。而在最小变率法中,OWA对乐观度呈线性关系,因此具有较好的计算效率。本文还进行了仿真研究,研究了最优决策对不确定性水平的依赖关系。在得到灵敏度测度的基础上,定义了一种新的组合优度测度,使其在求最优解时具有更高的可靠性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obtaining robust decisions under uncertainty by sensitivity analysis on OWA operator
The successful design and application of the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) method as a decision making tool depends on the efficient computation of its order weights. The most popular methods for determining the order weights are the fuzzy linguistic quantifiers approach and the minimal variability methods which give different behavior patterns for OWA. These methods will be compared by using sensitivity analysis on the outputs of OWA with respect to the optimism degree of the decision maker. The theoretical results are illustrated in a water resources management problem. The fuzzy linguistic quantifiers approach gives more information about the behavior of the OWA outputs in comparison to the minimal variability method. However, in using the minimal variability method, the OWA has a linear behavior with respect to the optimism degree and therefore it has better computation efficiency. A simulation study is also reported in this paper, where the dependence of the optimal decision on the uncertainty level is examined. Also based on obtained sensitivity measure, a new combined measure of goodness has been defined to have more reliability in obtaining optimal solutions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信