{"title":"二尖瓣置换术中心包内冰液是否会损伤膈神经","authors":"Sharjeel Abbas","doi":"10.38106/LMRJ.2020.2.7.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective of the study was to determine frequency of phrenic nerve injury during mitral valve replacement, with application of Ice Slush, and compare it with international data. This study was performed at Punjab Institute of Cardiology Pakistan from January 2010 to December 2015. A total of 1105 patients with only primary rheumatic mitral valve disease were prospectively observed. A total of 931 patients were enrolled into the study. After sternotomy & cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at 28-32°C, antegrade blood cardioplegia with potassium, Ice slush was applied all the time during repair or replacement of the mitral valve. A pre-designed proforma was used, that recorded phrenic nerve injury. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 21 was used for the analysis of data. Out of 931 patients who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement, 466 (50.1%) were males. Time spent on CPB ranged from 40 to 120 min; in 58.1% patients the time remained less than 80 minutes. As far as the ascending aortic cross clamp time was concerned, 83.1% patients had less than 40 minutes of cross clamp time. Post-operative chest X-ray remained normal in 97.5% patients whereas it showed atelectasis in 2.3% and elevated left hemidiaphragm in 0.2% of the patients. The total in-hospital mortality was 3.2% during study period. No patient was found to have phrenic nerve injury, unilateral or bilateral, during the study period.Topical cooling of heart, during mitral valve replacement, with Ice slush per se is not responsible for Phrenic nerve injury.","PeriodicalId":184438,"journal":{"name":"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Ice Slush Placed Inside Pericardial Well During Mitral Valve Replacement Cause Injury to Phrenic Nerve\",\"authors\":\"Sharjeel Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.38106/LMRJ.2020.2.7.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective of the study was to determine frequency of phrenic nerve injury during mitral valve replacement, with application of Ice Slush, and compare it with international data. This study was performed at Punjab Institute of Cardiology Pakistan from January 2010 to December 2015. A total of 1105 patients with only primary rheumatic mitral valve disease were prospectively observed. A total of 931 patients were enrolled into the study. After sternotomy & cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at 28-32°C, antegrade blood cardioplegia with potassium, Ice slush was applied all the time during repair or replacement of the mitral valve. A pre-designed proforma was used, that recorded phrenic nerve injury. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 21 was used for the analysis of data. Out of 931 patients who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement, 466 (50.1%) were males. Time spent on CPB ranged from 40 to 120 min; in 58.1% patients the time remained less than 80 minutes. As far as the ascending aortic cross clamp time was concerned, 83.1% patients had less than 40 minutes of cross clamp time. Post-operative chest X-ray remained normal in 97.5% patients whereas it showed atelectasis in 2.3% and elevated left hemidiaphragm in 0.2% of the patients. The total in-hospital mortality was 3.2% during study period. No patient was found to have phrenic nerve injury, unilateral or bilateral, during the study period.Topical cooling of heart, during mitral valve replacement, with Ice slush per se is not responsible for Phrenic nerve injury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38106/LMRJ.2020.2.7.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38106/LMRJ.2020.2.7.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨应用Ice Slush进行二尖瓣置换术时膈神经损伤的发生率,并与国际数据进行比较。本研究于2010年1月至2015年12月在巴基斯坦旁遮普省心脏病研究所进行。前瞻性观察了1105例原发性风湿性二尖瓣疾病患者。共有931名患者参加了这项研究。28 ~ 32℃开胸体外循环(CPB)后,行顺行钾血截瘫,在二尖瓣修复或置换术中一直应用冰泥。使用预先设计的表格,记录膈神经损伤。使用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)软件进行数据分析。在931例接受二尖瓣修复或置换的患者中,466例(50.1%)为男性。花在CPB上的时间从40到120分钟不等;58.1%的患者持续时间小于80分钟。从升主动脉交叉夹持时间来看,83.1%的患者交叉夹持时间小于40分钟。97.5%的患者术后胸片保持正常,2.3%的患者显示肺不张,0.2%的患者显示左膈升高。在研究期间,住院总死亡率为3.2%。研究期间未发现单侧或双侧膈神经损伤。在二尖瓣置换术中,用冰液局部冷却心脏本身并不是造成膈神经损伤的原因。
Does Ice Slush Placed Inside Pericardial Well During Mitral Valve Replacement Cause Injury to Phrenic Nerve
Objective of the study was to determine frequency of phrenic nerve injury during mitral valve replacement, with application of Ice Slush, and compare it with international data. This study was performed at Punjab Institute of Cardiology Pakistan from January 2010 to December 2015. A total of 1105 patients with only primary rheumatic mitral valve disease were prospectively observed. A total of 931 patients were enrolled into the study. After sternotomy & cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at 28-32°C, antegrade blood cardioplegia with potassium, Ice slush was applied all the time during repair or replacement of the mitral valve. A pre-designed proforma was used, that recorded phrenic nerve injury. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 21 was used for the analysis of data. Out of 931 patients who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement, 466 (50.1%) were males. Time spent on CPB ranged from 40 to 120 min; in 58.1% patients the time remained less than 80 minutes. As far as the ascending aortic cross clamp time was concerned, 83.1% patients had less than 40 minutes of cross clamp time. Post-operative chest X-ray remained normal in 97.5% patients whereas it showed atelectasis in 2.3% and elevated left hemidiaphragm in 0.2% of the patients. The total in-hospital mortality was 3.2% during study period. No patient was found to have phrenic nerve injury, unilateral or bilateral, during the study period.Topical cooling of heart, during mitral valve replacement, with Ice slush per se is not responsible for Phrenic nerve injury.