货币贬值与“大分流”:一份研究报告

N. Horesh
{"title":"货币贬值与“大分流”:一份研究报告","authors":"N. Horesh","doi":"10.32591/coas.ojsh.0501.01001h","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coin debasement as an omnipresent premodern monetary phenomenon has long been recognized. Yet, until recently, debasement was dealt with on a national or at-best continental level. To be precise, it was not sufficiently understood what role seigniorage played in financing early modern polities in comparative terms across Eurasia. Centering on China, particularly at times of war, this research note is the first step toward such an endeavor. It finds that seigniorage was generally lower in China than in early-modern Europe. It also finds greater tolerance for the concurrent circulation of old and new coinage in China. In China, coinage was conceived of in imperial nomenclature as a “public good” of sorts; one that the central government must provide largely at its own expense and even at a net loss in order to facilitate commoners’ livelihood.","PeriodicalId":412867,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal for Studies in History","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coin Debasement and the “Great Divergence”: A Research Note\",\"authors\":\"N. Horesh\",\"doi\":\"10.32591/coas.ojsh.0501.01001h\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coin debasement as an omnipresent premodern monetary phenomenon has long been recognized. Yet, until recently, debasement was dealt with on a national or at-best continental level. To be precise, it was not sufficiently understood what role seigniorage played in financing early modern polities in comparative terms across Eurasia. Centering on China, particularly at times of war, this research note is the first step toward such an endeavor. It finds that seigniorage was generally lower in China than in early-modern Europe. It also finds greater tolerance for the concurrent circulation of old and new coinage in China. In China, coinage was conceived of in imperial nomenclature as a “public good” of sorts; one that the central government must provide largely at its own expense and even at a net loss in order to facilitate commoners’ livelihood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal for Studies in History\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal for Studies in History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsh.0501.01001h\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal for Studies in History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsh.0501.01001h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硬币贬值是一种普遍存在的前现代货币现象,人们早已认识到这一点。然而,直到最近,货币贬值都是在国家层面,至多是在大陆层面上处理的。确切地说,人们对铸币税在欧亚大陆的早期现代政治融资中所起的作用还没有充分的了解。以中国为中心,特别是在战争时期,这份研究报告是朝着这种努力迈出的第一步。研究发现,中国的铸币税普遍低于近代早期的欧洲。它还发现中国对新旧硬币同时流通的容忍度更大。在中国,铸币在皇家命名法中被认为是某种“公共产品”;中央政府必须在很大程度上自费提供,甚至是净亏损,以促进平民的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coin Debasement and the “Great Divergence”: A Research Note
Coin debasement as an omnipresent premodern monetary phenomenon has long been recognized. Yet, until recently, debasement was dealt with on a national or at-best continental level. To be precise, it was not sufficiently understood what role seigniorage played in financing early modern polities in comparative terms across Eurasia. Centering on China, particularly at times of war, this research note is the first step toward such an endeavor. It finds that seigniorage was generally lower in China than in early-modern Europe. It also finds greater tolerance for the concurrent circulation of old and new coinage in China. In China, coinage was conceived of in imperial nomenclature as a “public good” of sorts; one that the central government must provide largely at its own expense and even at a net loss in order to facilitate commoners’ livelihood.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信