{"title":"利用“总量控制与交易”控制系统性金融风险","authors":"A. Milne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1723721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systemic risk depends upon aggregate exposure for the entire financial sector, as well as the pattern of exposures between firms. There is a parallel with global warming, where the rise in the Earth’s temperature depends upon the aggregate volume of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This suggests that ‘cap and trade,’ issuing licenses that limit aggregate financial sector ratios but allowing firms to trade licenses with each other so that their individual contributions can vary, is a useful approach to containing systemic financial risk. In particular it avoids potentially costly direct control of individual firm liabilities. Cap and trade does not appear difficult to implement for controlling aggregate maturity mismatch, and unlike many other regulations can be introduced on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis, without being undermined by cross-border arbitrage or by the movement of risk into the unregulated sector. The main requirement is a comprehensive liability register, which will in any case be very useful to regulators both for risk monitoring and for resolution of failed institutions. Industry will object that this requires a major change in their business models, but this could reduce financial market volatility and hence provide further benefits to investors.","PeriodicalId":176966,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes & Subsidies (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using ‘Cap and Trade’ to Contain Systemic Financial Risk\",\"authors\":\"A. Milne\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1723721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systemic risk depends upon aggregate exposure for the entire financial sector, as well as the pattern of exposures between firms. There is a parallel with global warming, where the rise in the Earth’s temperature depends upon the aggregate volume of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This suggests that ‘cap and trade,’ issuing licenses that limit aggregate financial sector ratios but allowing firms to trade licenses with each other so that their individual contributions can vary, is a useful approach to containing systemic financial risk. In particular it avoids potentially costly direct control of individual firm liabilities. Cap and trade does not appear difficult to implement for controlling aggregate maturity mismatch, and unlike many other regulations can be introduced on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis, without being undermined by cross-border arbitrage or by the movement of risk into the unregulated sector. The main requirement is a comprehensive liability register, which will in any case be very useful to regulators both for risk monitoring and for resolution of failed institutions. Industry will object that this requires a major change in their business models, but this could reduce financial market volatility and hence provide further benefits to investors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes & Subsidies (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes & Subsidies (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1723721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes & Subsidies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1723721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
系统性风险取决于整个金融部门的总风险敞口,以及公司之间的风险敞口模式。这与全球变暖有相似之处,地球温度的上升取决于大气中二氧化碳和其他温室气体的总量。这表明,“总量管制与交易”(cap and trade)是遏制系统性金融风险的一种有用方法,即发放限制金融部门总体比率的许可证,但允许公司之间进行许可证交易,这样它们的个人贡献就可以有所不同。特别是,它避免了对个别公司负债的潜在的代价高昂的直接控制。在控制总期限错配方面,“总量管制与交易”似乎并不难实施,而且与许多其他监管不同,它可以在各个司法管辖区的基础上引入,而不会因跨境套利或风险转移到不受监管的部门而受到损害。主要要求是一份全面的责任登记册,无论如何,这对监管机构在风险监控和破产机构处置方面都非常有用。业界会反对说,这需要他们对商业模式进行重大改变,但这可以减少金融市场的波动,从而为投资者带来进一步的好处。
Using ‘Cap and Trade’ to Contain Systemic Financial Risk
Systemic risk depends upon aggregate exposure for the entire financial sector, as well as the pattern of exposures between firms. There is a parallel with global warming, where the rise in the Earth’s temperature depends upon the aggregate volume of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This suggests that ‘cap and trade,’ issuing licenses that limit aggregate financial sector ratios but allowing firms to trade licenses with each other so that their individual contributions can vary, is a useful approach to containing systemic financial risk. In particular it avoids potentially costly direct control of individual firm liabilities. Cap and trade does not appear difficult to implement for controlling aggregate maturity mismatch, and unlike many other regulations can be introduced on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis, without being undermined by cross-border arbitrage or by the movement of risk into the unregulated sector. The main requirement is a comprehensive liability register, which will in any case be very useful to regulators both for risk monitoring and for resolution of failed institutions. Industry will object that this requires a major change in their business models, but this could reduce financial market volatility and hence provide further benefits to investors.