{"title":"强制执行非价格利益的贿赂:赔偿的新角色","authors":"W. J. Gordon, Tamar Frankel","doi":"10.4324/9781003073321-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Boomer v. Muir, a subcontractor on a hydroelectric project continued to provide goods and services even though the value of the performance far exceeded the contract price. The general contractor, who was receiving these goods and services, breached the contract even though he was paying less than market price for them.<br><br>Please see the complete abstract in the article.","PeriodicalId":404809,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Rights & Remedies (Private Law - Contracts) (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enforcing Coasian Bribes for Non-Price Benefits: A New Role for Restitution\",\"authors\":\"W. J. Gordon, Tamar Frankel\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003073321-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Boomer v. Muir, a subcontractor on a hydroelectric project continued to provide goods and services even though the value of the performance far exceeded the contract price. The general contractor, who was receiving these goods and services, breached the contract even though he was paying less than market price for them.<br><br>Please see the complete abstract in the article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Rights & Remedies (Private Law - Contracts) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Rights & Remedies (Private Law - Contracts) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073321-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Rights & Remedies (Private Law - Contracts) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073321-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在Boomer v. Muir一案中,水电项目的分包商继续提供货物和服务,尽管其绩效价值远远超过合同价格。接收这些货物和服务的总承包商违反了合同,尽管他支付的价格低于市场价格。请参阅文章中的完整摘要。
Enforcing Coasian Bribes for Non-Price Benefits: A New Role for Restitution
In Boomer v. Muir, a subcontractor on a hydroelectric project continued to provide goods and services even though the value of the performance far exceeded the contract price. The general contractor, who was receiving these goods and services, breached the contract even though he was paying less than market price for them.