DNA存储中聚类方法的比较分析

Subhasiny Sankar, Yixin Wang, Zhang Jiayu, Nur Sabrina, E. Gunawan, Y. L. Guan, Noor-A-Rahim Md., C. Poh
{"title":"DNA存储中聚类方法的比较分析","authors":"Subhasiny Sankar, Yixin Wang, Zhang Jiayu, Nur Sabrina, E. Gunawan, Y. L. Guan, Noor-A-Rahim Md., C. Poh","doi":"10.1109/ICSEC56337.2022.10049327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Owing to the significance of DNA storage technology in meeting exponential storage demands and longevity, the challenges caused by bio-molecular errors while reading/sequencing data from DNA molecules must be addressed. By reading redundant copies, data can be reconstructed but with associated cost of sequencing and decoding complexities. Hence, solutions for dealing with both errors and complexities are sought after. The main objective of this work is to study data reconstruction methods for processing sequence readouts at downstream stage of DNA data storage. We investigated applicability of three clustering tools -Starcode, Slidesort, MeShClust, and two algorithms - Majority Nucleotide Selection (MNS), Cooperative Sequence Clustering (CSC) by transforming them into suitable tools for storage application. We observed that for fixed redundancy of 6.3x to 8.6x based on the nature of the dataset, Starcode outperforms other tools with 1% to 40% higher recovery rate. However, it costs the highest decoding complexity whereas MNS and CSC provides the lowest decoding complexity. Moreover, the distribution of the cluster and clustering speed of each tool/method are compared. This is the first comparative analysis study of tools/methods for data reconstruction in DNA data storage.","PeriodicalId":430850,"journal":{"name":"2022 26th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC)","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Clustering Methodologies in DNA Storage\",\"authors\":\"Subhasiny Sankar, Yixin Wang, Zhang Jiayu, Nur Sabrina, E. Gunawan, Y. L. Guan, Noor-A-Rahim Md., C. Poh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSEC56337.2022.10049327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Owing to the significance of DNA storage technology in meeting exponential storage demands and longevity, the challenges caused by bio-molecular errors while reading/sequencing data from DNA molecules must be addressed. By reading redundant copies, data can be reconstructed but with associated cost of sequencing and decoding complexities. Hence, solutions for dealing with both errors and complexities are sought after. The main objective of this work is to study data reconstruction methods for processing sequence readouts at downstream stage of DNA data storage. We investigated applicability of three clustering tools -Starcode, Slidesort, MeShClust, and two algorithms - Majority Nucleotide Selection (MNS), Cooperative Sequence Clustering (CSC) by transforming them into suitable tools for storage application. We observed that for fixed redundancy of 6.3x to 8.6x based on the nature of the dataset, Starcode outperforms other tools with 1% to 40% higher recovery rate. However, it costs the highest decoding complexity whereas MNS and CSC provides the lowest decoding complexity. Moreover, the distribution of the cluster and clustering speed of each tool/method are compared. This is the first comparative analysis study of tools/methods for data reconstruction in DNA data storage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 26th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC)\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 26th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEC56337.2022.10049327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 26th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEC56337.2022.10049327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于DNA存储技术在满足指数存储需求和寿命方面的重要性,因此必须解决从DNA分子中读取/测序数据时生物分子误差带来的挑战。通过读取冗余副本,可以重建数据,但会带来排序和解码复杂性的相关成本。因此,人们寻求处理错误和复杂性的解决方案。本工作的主要目的是研究在DNA数据存储的下游阶段处理序列读出的数据重建方法。我们研究了三种聚类工具——starcode、Slidesort、MeShClust以及两种算法——多数核苷酸选择(MNS)、合作序列聚类(CSC),并将它们转化为适合存储应用的工具。我们观察到,对于基于数据集性质的6.3倍到8.6倍的固定冗余,Starcode的恢复速度比其他工具高出1%到40%。但是,它的译码复杂度最高,而MNS和CSC的译码复杂度最低。此外,还比较了各种工具/方法的聚类分布和聚类速度。这是DNA数据存储中数据重建的工具/方法的第一个比较分析研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Clustering Methodologies in DNA Storage
Owing to the significance of DNA storage technology in meeting exponential storage demands and longevity, the challenges caused by bio-molecular errors while reading/sequencing data from DNA molecules must be addressed. By reading redundant copies, data can be reconstructed but with associated cost of sequencing and decoding complexities. Hence, solutions for dealing with both errors and complexities are sought after. The main objective of this work is to study data reconstruction methods for processing sequence readouts at downstream stage of DNA data storage. We investigated applicability of three clustering tools -Starcode, Slidesort, MeShClust, and two algorithms - Majority Nucleotide Selection (MNS), Cooperative Sequence Clustering (CSC) by transforming them into suitable tools for storage application. We observed that for fixed redundancy of 6.3x to 8.6x based on the nature of the dataset, Starcode outperforms other tools with 1% to 40% higher recovery rate. However, it costs the highest decoding complexity whereas MNS and CSC provides the lowest decoding complexity. Moreover, the distribution of the cluster and clustering speed of each tool/method are compared. This is the first comparative analysis study of tools/methods for data reconstruction in DNA data storage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信