双隧道喙锁韧带重建术的四种固定方法:(生物力学评价:有限元分析)

Sataporn Kala, A. Kwanyuang
{"title":"双隧道喙锁韧带重建术的四种固定方法:(生物力学评价:有限元分析)","authors":"Sataporn Kala, A. Kwanyuang","doi":"10.1109/BMEiCON53485.2021.9745240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To treat Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation, the two-tunnel Coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments reconstruction is a recommended technique. However, failures including tunnel widening and loss of reduction are presented due to the use of this treatment technique. Previous studies reported that some fixation methods might potentially be a cause of failure in dislocation treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the fixation stability and effect of four different fixation methods in two-tunnel CC ligament reconstruction technique using finite element analysis. The simplified constructs of various surgical procedures were divided into four models, which were different in tunnel location and fixation method. 70 N loads in three different directions were applied on all models. Displacement and peak von Mises stress output parameters were evaluated. The magnitude of maximum stress occurred on clavicle in all models showed lower values than the average yield strength of that bone (114 MPa). Interestingly, the perpendicular tunnel position with O-loop fixation method generated stress value lower than other models. This type of fixation also exhibited the lowest displacement value in superior direction, which could be used to determine a good fixation stability. Therefore, the perpendicular tunnel position with O-loop fixation method may help to decrease risk of failure after treatment due to a criterion of cumulative stress on the construct.","PeriodicalId":380002,"journal":{"name":"2021 13th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Four fixation Methods in Two-tunnel Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Technique : (Biomechanical evaluation: finite element analysis)\",\"authors\":\"Sataporn Kala, A. Kwanyuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BMEiCON53485.2021.9745240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To treat Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation, the two-tunnel Coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments reconstruction is a recommended technique. However, failures including tunnel widening and loss of reduction are presented due to the use of this treatment technique. Previous studies reported that some fixation methods might potentially be a cause of failure in dislocation treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the fixation stability and effect of four different fixation methods in two-tunnel CC ligament reconstruction technique using finite element analysis. The simplified constructs of various surgical procedures were divided into four models, which were different in tunnel location and fixation method. 70 N loads in three different directions were applied on all models. Displacement and peak von Mises stress output parameters were evaluated. The magnitude of maximum stress occurred on clavicle in all models showed lower values than the average yield strength of that bone (114 MPa). Interestingly, the perpendicular tunnel position with O-loop fixation method generated stress value lower than other models. This type of fixation also exhibited the lowest displacement value in superior direction, which could be used to determine a good fixation stability. Therefore, the perpendicular tunnel position with O-loop fixation method may help to decrease risk of failure after treatment due to a criterion of cumulative stress on the construct.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 13th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 13th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEiCON53485.2021.9745240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 13th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEiCON53485.2021.9745240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了治疗肩锁关节脱位,双隧道喙锁韧带重建是一种推荐的技术。然而,由于使用这种处理技术,出现了隧道变宽和减少损失等故障。先前的研究报道了一些固定方法可能是脱位治疗失败的潜在原因。因此,本研究旨在通过有限元分析探讨四种不同固定方法在双隧道CC韧带重建技术中的固定稳定性和效果。各种手术方式的简化构造分为四种模型,不同模型的隧道位置和固定方法不同。在所有模型上施加三个不同方向的70 N荷载。对位移和峰值von Mises应力输出参数进行了评估。所有模型锁骨的最大应力值均低于该骨的平均屈服强度(114 MPa)。有趣的是,采用o型环固定方法的垂直隧道位置产生的应力值低于其他模型。这种类型的固定也表现出最低的上方向位移值,可以用来确定良好的固定稳定性。因此,垂直的隧道位置采用o型环固定方法可能有助于降低治疗后的失败风险,因为施工过程中存在累积应力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Four fixation Methods in Two-tunnel Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Technique : (Biomechanical evaluation: finite element analysis)
To treat Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation, the two-tunnel Coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments reconstruction is a recommended technique. However, failures including tunnel widening and loss of reduction are presented due to the use of this treatment technique. Previous studies reported that some fixation methods might potentially be a cause of failure in dislocation treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the fixation stability and effect of four different fixation methods in two-tunnel CC ligament reconstruction technique using finite element analysis. The simplified constructs of various surgical procedures were divided into four models, which were different in tunnel location and fixation method. 70 N loads in three different directions were applied on all models. Displacement and peak von Mises stress output parameters were evaluated. The magnitude of maximum stress occurred on clavicle in all models showed lower values than the average yield strength of that bone (114 MPa). Interestingly, the perpendicular tunnel position with O-loop fixation method generated stress value lower than other models. This type of fixation also exhibited the lowest displacement value in superior direction, which could be used to determine a good fixation stability. Therefore, the perpendicular tunnel position with O-loop fixation method may help to decrease risk of failure after treatment due to a criterion of cumulative stress on the construct.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信