体育赌博与法律:美国如何规范其最有利可图的恶习

John T. Holden, M. Edelman
{"title":"体育赌博与法律:美国如何规范其最有利可图的恶习","authors":"John T. Holden, M. Edelman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3556122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On May 14, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its seminal ruling in Murphy v. NCAA, which held that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) violated the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This ruling, in conjunction with other societal changes, has opened the floodgates for states to liberalize laws on sports betting. In less than two years since the Supreme Court’s Murphy decision, nineteen U.S. states, in addition to Washington D.C., have legalized sports betting in some form. Meanwhile, eleven states have specifically legalized online sports betting. This article (or, perhaps more accurately stated, short treatise) is the first of its kind to provide a detailed analysis of how the United States regulates sports gambling in the aftermath of Murphy v. NCAA. The article examines closely the history of sports gambling, seminal legal decisions involving the sports betting industry, new state regulatory systems that have emerged since the Supreme Court’s Murphy decision, newfound legal risks for companies that operate in sports gaming markets, and important matters of public policy related to regulating America’s most lucrative vice.","PeriodicalId":416511,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Short Treatise On Sports Gambling and the Law: How America Regulates Its Most Lucrative Vice\",\"authors\":\"John T. Holden, M. Edelman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3556122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On May 14, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its seminal ruling in Murphy v. NCAA, which held that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) violated the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This ruling, in conjunction with other societal changes, has opened the floodgates for states to liberalize laws on sports betting. In less than two years since the Supreme Court’s Murphy decision, nineteen U.S. states, in addition to Washington D.C., have legalized sports betting in some form. Meanwhile, eleven states have specifically legalized online sports betting. This article (or, perhaps more accurately stated, short treatise) is the first of its kind to provide a detailed analysis of how the United States regulates sports gambling in the aftermath of Murphy v. NCAA. The article examines closely the history of sports gambling, seminal legal decisions involving the sports betting industry, new state regulatory systems that have emerged since the Supreme Court’s Murphy decision, newfound legal risks for companies that operate in sports gaming markets, and important matters of public policy related to regulating America’s most lucrative vice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2018年5月14日,美国最高法院在墨菲诉NCAA案中作出了具有开创性意义的裁决,认为《职业和业余体育保护法》违反了美国宪法第十修正案。这项裁决与其他社会变化一起,为各州开放体育博彩法律打开了闸门。在最高法院墨菲案判决后不到两年的时间里,美国19个州,除了华盛顿特区,已经以某种形式将体育博彩合法化。与此同时,11个州已经明确将在线体育博彩合法化。这篇文章(或者,也许更准确地说,是一篇简短的论文)是此类文章中第一篇详细分析墨菲诉NCAA案后美国如何监管体育博彩的文章。本文仔细研究了体育博彩的历史,涉及体育博彩行业的开创性法律决策,自最高法院墨菲判决以来出现的新的州监管体系,在体育博彩市场运营的公司的新发现的法律风险,以及与规范美国最有利可图的罪恶相关的公共政策的重要事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Short Treatise On Sports Gambling and the Law: How America Regulates Its Most Lucrative Vice
On May 14, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its seminal ruling in Murphy v. NCAA, which held that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) violated the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This ruling, in conjunction with other societal changes, has opened the floodgates for states to liberalize laws on sports betting. In less than two years since the Supreme Court’s Murphy decision, nineteen U.S. states, in addition to Washington D.C., have legalized sports betting in some form. Meanwhile, eleven states have specifically legalized online sports betting. This article (or, perhaps more accurately stated, short treatise) is the first of its kind to provide a detailed analysis of how the United States regulates sports gambling in the aftermath of Murphy v. NCAA. The article examines closely the history of sports gambling, seminal legal decisions involving the sports betting industry, new state regulatory systems that have emerged since the Supreme Court’s Murphy decision, newfound legal risks for companies that operate in sports gaming markets, and important matters of public policy related to regulating America’s most lucrative vice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信