序贯高斯模拟与人工神经网络直井渗透率预测模型的对比研究

O. Rotimi, A. Akande, Betty Ihekona, Oseremen Iyamah, Somto Chukwuka, Yao Liang, Wang Zhenli, O. Ologe
{"title":"序贯高斯模拟与人工神经网络直井渗透率预测模型的对比研究","authors":"O. Rotimi, A. Akande, Betty Ihekona, Oseremen Iyamah, Somto Chukwuka, Yao Liang, Wang Zhenli, O. Ologe","doi":"10.2118/211987-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study attempts to estimate permeability from well logs data and also predict values from existing rock sections to points that are missing using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGS). Potentially, exploration data is prone to trends that are initiated by the sedimentation process, but a detrending method using Semi-variogram (vertical) algorithm was applied to remove this from the interpreted wells which are all vertical. Permeability modeled for ANN gave an estimated root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0449, while SGS gave RMSE of 0.1789, both giving a ‘K’ range of 100 – 1000 mD. Although the spatial geology of the area was relegated and not considered, making a spatial prediction influenced from the temporal reference point un-assessable. However, the independent prediction on the overall result shows a better prediction from the ANN, perhaps due to the optimization algorithm used.","PeriodicalId":399294,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Predictive Models for Permeability from Vertical wells using Sequential Gaussian Simulation and Artificial Neural Networks\",\"authors\":\"O. Rotimi, A. Akande, Betty Ihekona, Oseremen Iyamah, Somto Chukwuka, Yao Liang, Wang Zhenli, O. Ologe\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/211987-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study attempts to estimate permeability from well logs data and also predict values from existing rock sections to points that are missing using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGS). Potentially, exploration data is prone to trends that are initiated by the sedimentation process, but a detrending method using Semi-variogram (vertical) algorithm was applied to remove this from the interpreted wells which are all vertical. Permeability modeled for ANN gave an estimated root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0449, while SGS gave RMSE of 0.1789, both giving a ‘K’ range of 100 – 1000 mD. Although the spatial geology of the area was relegated and not considered, making a spatial prediction influenced from the temporal reference point un-assessable. However, the independent prediction on the overall result shows a better prediction from the ANN, perhaps due to the optimization algorithm used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/211987-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/211987-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究试图从测井数据中估计渗透率,并利用人工神经网络(ANN)和序贯高斯模拟(SGS)预测现有岩石剖面到缺失点的渗透率。勘探数据可能倾向于由沉积过程引发的趋势,但采用了一种使用半变异函数(垂直)算法的去趋势方法,从所有垂直的解释井中消除了这种趋势。基于人工神经网络的渗透率模型给出的均方根误差(RMSE)估计为0.0449,而SGS给出的RMSE估计为0.1789,两者都给出了100 - 1000 mD的“K”范围。尽管该地区的空间地质被降低,没有考虑,因此受时间参考点影响的空间预测无法评估。然而,对整体结果的独立预测表明,人工神经网络的预测效果更好,这可能是由于使用了优化算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Predictive Models for Permeability from Vertical wells using Sequential Gaussian Simulation and Artificial Neural Networks
This study attempts to estimate permeability from well logs data and also predict values from existing rock sections to points that are missing using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGS). Potentially, exploration data is prone to trends that are initiated by the sedimentation process, but a detrending method using Semi-variogram (vertical) algorithm was applied to remove this from the interpreted wells which are all vertical. Permeability modeled for ANN gave an estimated root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0449, while SGS gave RMSE of 0.1789, both giving a ‘K’ range of 100 – 1000 mD. Although the spatial geology of the area was relegated and not considered, making a spatial prediction influenced from the temporal reference point un-assessable. However, the independent prediction on the overall result shows a better prediction from the ANN, perhaps due to the optimization algorithm used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信