比较不同算法在房间租赁市场应用中的公平性和有效性

David Solans, Francesco Fabbri, Caterina Calsamiglia, Carlos Castillo, F. Bonchi
{"title":"比较不同算法在房间租赁市场应用中的公平性和有效性","authors":"David Solans, Francesco Fabbri, Caterina Calsamiglia, Carlos Castillo, F. Bonchi","doi":"10.1145/3461702.3462600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been increasingly adopted by the real estate market in the last few years. Applications include, among many others, predicting the market value of a property or an area, advanced systems for managing marketing and ads campaigns, and recommendation systems based on user preferences. While these techniques can provide important benefits to the business owners and the users of the platforms, algorithmic biases can result in inequalities and loss of opportunities for groups of people who are already disadvantaged in their access to housing. In this work, we present a comprehensive and independent algorithmic evaluation of a recommender system for the real estate market, designed specifically for finding shared apartments in metropolitan areas. We were granted full access to the internals of the platform, including details on algorithms and usage data during a period of 2 years. We analyze the performance of the various algorithms which are deployed for the recommender system and asses their effect across different population groups. Our analysis reveals that introducing a recommender system algorithm facilitates finding an appropriate tenant or a desirable room to rent, but at the same time, it strengthen performance inequalities between groups, further reducing opportunities of finding a rental for certain minorities.","PeriodicalId":197336,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Equity and Effectiveness of Different Algorithms in an Application for the Room Rental Market\",\"authors\":\"David Solans, Francesco Fabbri, Caterina Calsamiglia, Carlos Castillo, F. Bonchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3461702.3462600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been increasingly adopted by the real estate market in the last few years. Applications include, among many others, predicting the market value of a property or an area, advanced systems for managing marketing and ads campaigns, and recommendation systems based on user preferences. While these techniques can provide important benefits to the business owners and the users of the platforms, algorithmic biases can result in inequalities and loss of opportunities for groups of people who are already disadvantaged in their access to housing. In this work, we present a comprehensive and independent algorithmic evaluation of a recommender system for the real estate market, designed specifically for finding shared apartments in metropolitan areas. We were granted full access to the internals of the platform, including details on algorithms and usage data during a period of 2 years. We analyze the performance of the various algorithms which are deployed for the recommender system and asses their effect across different population groups. Our analysis reveals that introducing a recommender system algorithm facilitates finding an appropriate tenant or a desirable room to rent, but at the same time, it strengthen performance inequalities between groups, further reducing opportunities of finding a rental for certain minorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的几年里,机器学习(ML)技术越来越多地应用于房地产市场。应用程序包括预测房产或地区的市场价值,管理营销和广告活动的高级系统,以及基于用户偏好的推荐系统。虽然这些技术可以为企业主和平台的用户提供重要的好处,但算法偏见可能导致不平等,并使已经在获得住房方面处于不利地位的群体失去机会。在这项工作中,我们对房地产市场的推荐系统进行了全面而独立的算法评估,该系统专门用于在大都市地区寻找共享公寓。在2年的时间里,我们获得了对平台内部的完全访问权,包括算法和使用数据的详细信息。我们分析了为推荐系统部署的各种算法的性能,并评估了它们在不同人群中的效果。我们的分析表明,引入推荐系统算法有助于找到合适的租户或理想的房间出租,但同时,它加剧了群体之间的表现不平等,进一步减少了某些少数群体找到租金的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Equity and Effectiveness of Different Algorithms in an Application for the Room Rental Market
Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been increasingly adopted by the real estate market in the last few years. Applications include, among many others, predicting the market value of a property or an area, advanced systems for managing marketing and ads campaigns, and recommendation systems based on user preferences. While these techniques can provide important benefits to the business owners and the users of the platforms, algorithmic biases can result in inequalities and loss of opportunities for groups of people who are already disadvantaged in their access to housing. In this work, we present a comprehensive and independent algorithmic evaluation of a recommender system for the real estate market, designed specifically for finding shared apartments in metropolitan areas. We were granted full access to the internals of the platform, including details on algorithms and usage data during a period of 2 years. We analyze the performance of the various algorithms which are deployed for the recommender system and asses their effect across different population groups. Our analysis reveals that introducing a recommender system algorithm facilitates finding an appropriate tenant or a desirable room to rent, but at the same time, it strengthen performance inequalities between groups, further reducing opportunities of finding a rental for certain minorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信