以家庭为基础的心力衰竭项目降低急性护理使用的成本效益。

V. Thomas, R. Rao, Cathy C. Schubert, A. Nagel, R. Kafer
{"title":"以家庭为基础的心力衰竭项目降低急性护理使用的成本效益。","authors":"V. Thomas, R. Rao, Cathy C. Schubert, A. Nagel, R. Kafer","doi":"10.3390/IECGCM-1-06168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nHeart failure is the number one cause of hospital readmissions among Veteran Affairs (VA) patients. We implemented a home-based RN/LPN team who provided short-term, intensive CHF case management in collaboration with a cardiologist with the goal of reducing 30-day readmissions, ER visits, and hospitalizations. \nMethods: \nThis retrospective study evaluated ER visits, admissions, 30-day readmission rates, and total inpatient days for 108 CHF patients at the Indianapolis VA Medical Center enrolled in the home-based CHF program from May 2016-September 2017. Data was retrieved from national VA databases as well as the electronic medical record. We compared patients’ acute care utilization six months prior to the program, during the program, and at six months post-program discharge using chi squared test. \nResults: \n500 Veterans were admitted with HF at our hospital in 2016 with the 30-day readmission rate of 21% before our program start date. When comparing all 500 HF patients admitted at our VA with the 108 patients enrolled, the difference in 30-day readmissions was significant (p <.001), with only 7% of our patients having a 30-day readmission within the first 30 days of enrollment into the program. When comparing our study population itself six months pre-program versus during program, there was a large reduction in ER visits and admissions per patient during the program (0.537 vs. 0.361) and (1.63 vs. 0.296). When comparing 6 months pre-program vs. during program enrollment and 6 months post-program discharge, the number of total inpatient days per person was drastically reduced (9.31 vs. 1.33) (9.31 vs 2.73). Using the average cost of one day in the hospital, $3,400, the VA saved approximately $22,372 per patient during our study. The average cost for the CHF home care team yearly is $213, 004, whereas the approximate savings for this program per year is $4,832,352, giving a total annual cost savings of $4,619,348. \nConclusions: \n Short-term, intensive home-based teams for high-risk Veterans with CHF can reduce ER visits, admissions, 30-day readmissions, and the number of inpatient days and be highly cost-effective. This home-based care model must also be noted for showing significant effect persisting after the formal program/intervention ended as there was a continued sizable reduction 6 months post-program discharge in total inpatient days.","PeriodicalId":301449,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1st International Electronic Conference on Geriatric Care Models","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effective Reduction of Acute Care Utilization using Home-Based Heart Failure Program.\",\"authors\":\"V. Thomas, R. Rao, Cathy C. Schubert, A. Nagel, R. Kafer\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/IECGCM-1-06168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: \\nHeart failure is the number one cause of hospital readmissions among Veteran Affairs (VA) patients. We implemented a home-based RN/LPN team who provided short-term, intensive CHF case management in collaboration with a cardiologist with the goal of reducing 30-day readmissions, ER visits, and hospitalizations. \\nMethods: \\nThis retrospective study evaluated ER visits, admissions, 30-day readmission rates, and total inpatient days for 108 CHF patients at the Indianapolis VA Medical Center enrolled in the home-based CHF program from May 2016-September 2017. Data was retrieved from national VA databases as well as the electronic medical record. We compared patients’ acute care utilization six months prior to the program, during the program, and at six months post-program discharge using chi squared test. \\nResults: \\n500 Veterans were admitted with HF at our hospital in 2016 with the 30-day readmission rate of 21% before our program start date. When comparing all 500 HF patients admitted at our VA with the 108 patients enrolled, the difference in 30-day readmissions was significant (p <.001), with only 7% of our patients having a 30-day readmission within the first 30 days of enrollment into the program. When comparing our study population itself six months pre-program versus during program, there was a large reduction in ER visits and admissions per patient during the program (0.537 vs. 0.361) and (1.63 vs. 0.296). When comparing 6 months pre-program vs. during program enrollment and 6 months post-program discharge, the number of total inpatient days per person was drastically reduced (9.31 vs. 1.33) (9.31 vs 2.73). Using the average cost of one day in the hospital, $3,400, the VA saved approximately $22,372 per patient during our study. The average cost for the CHF home care team yearly is $213, 004, whereas the approximate savings for this program per year is $4,832,352, giving a total annual cost savings of $4,619,348. \\nConclusions: \\n Short-term, intensive home-based teams for high-risk Veterans with CHF can reduce ER visits, admissions, 30-day readmissions, and the number of inpatient days and be highly cost-effective. This home-based care model must also be noted for showing significant effect persisting after the formal program/intervention ended as there was a continued sizable reduction 6 months post-program discharge in total inpatient days.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1st International Electronic Conference on Geriatric Care Models\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1st International Electronic Conference on Geriatric Care Models\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/IECGCM-1-06168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1st International Electronic Conference on Geriatric Care Models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/IECGCM-1-06168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心力衰竭是退伍军人事务(VA)患者再入院的头号原因。我们实施了一个以家庭为基础的RN/LPN团队,他们与心脏病专家合作,提供短期、强化的CHF病例管理,目标是减少30天的再入院、急诊室就诊和住院。方法:本回顾性研究评估了2016年5月至2017年9月在印第安纳波利斯VA医疗中心参加以家庭为基础的CHF项目的108例CHF患者的急诊就诊、入院情况、30天再入院率和总住院天数。数据是从国家退伍军人管理局数据库以及电子病历中检索的。我们使用卡方检验比较了患者在项目前6个月、项目期间和项目后6个月的急性护理利用情况。结果:2016年我院收治了500例HF退伍军人,在项目开始前30天再入院率为21%。当比较我们VA收治的所有500例HF患者与入组的108例患者时,30天再入院的差异是显著的(p < 0.001),只有7%的患者在入组的前30天内再入院30天。当比较我们的研究人群本身在项目前6个月与项目中6个月时,每个患者在项目期间的急诊就诊和住院次数大幅减少(0.537 vs 0.361)和(1.63 vs 0.296)。当比较项目前6个月与项目注册期间和项目后6个月出院时,每人总住院天数大幅减少(9.31 vs 1.33) (9.31 vs 2.73)。在我们的研究中,以住院一天的平均费用3400美元计算,退伍军人事务部为每位患者节省了大约22372美元。瑞士法郎家庭护理团队每年的平均成本为213,004美元,而这个项目每年大约节省4,832,352美元,每年节省的总成本为4,619,348美元。结论:针对高风险退伍军人CHF的短期强化家庭团队可以减少急诊室就诊次数、入院次数、30天再入院次数和住院天数,具有很高的成本效益。这种以家庭为基础的护理模式在正式项目/干预结束后仍显示出显著的效果,因为项目后6个月出院总住院天数持续大幅减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Effective Reduction of Acute Care Utilization using Home-Based Heart Failure Program.
Background: Heart failure is the number one cause of hospital readmissions among Veteran Affairs (VA) patients. We implemented a home-based RN/LPN team who provided short-term, intensive CHF case management in collaboration with a cardiologist with the goal of reducing 30-day readmissions, ER visits, and hospitalizations. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated ER visits, admissions, 30-day readmission rates, and total inpatient days for 108 CHF patients at the Indianapolis VA Medical Center enrolled in the home-based CHF program from May 2016-September 2017. Data was retrieved from national VA databases as well as the electronic medical record. We compared patients’ acute care utilization six months prior to the program, during the program, and at six months post-program discharge using chi squared test. Results: 500 Veterans were admitted with HF at our hospital in 2016 with the 30-day readmission rate of 21% before our program start date. When comparing all 500 HF patients admitted at our VA with the 108 patients enrolled, the difference in 30-day readmissions was significant (p <.001), with only 7% of our patients having a 30-day readmission within the first 30 days of enrollment into the program. When comparing our study population itself six months pre-program versus during program, there was a large reduction in ER visits and admissions per patient during the program (0.537 vs. 0.361) and (1.63 vs. 0.296). When comparing 6 months pre-program vs. during program enrollment and 6 months post-program discharge, the number of total inpatient days per person was drastically reduced (9.31 vs. 1.33) (9.31 vs 2.73). Using the average cost of one day in the hospital, $3,400, the VA saved approximately $22,372 per patient during our study. The average cost for the CHF home care team yearly is $213, 004, whereas the approximate savings for this program per year is $4,832,352, giving a total annual cost savings of $4,619,348. Conclusions: Short-term, intensive home-based teams for high-risk Veterans with CHF can reduce ER visits, admissions, 30-day readmissions, and the number of inpatient days and be highly cost-effective. This home-based care model must also be noted for showing significant effect persisting after the formal program/intervention ended as there was a continued sizable reduction 6 months post-program discharge in total inpatient days.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信