使用远程监督的社会和行为科学论文的理论实体提取

Xin Wei, Lamia Salsabil, Jian Wu
{"title":"使用远程监督的社会和行为科学论文的理论实体提取","authors":"Xin Wei, Lamia Salsabil, Jian Wu","doi":"10.1145/3558100.3563855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theories and models, which are common in scientific papers in almost all domains, usually provide the foundations of theoretical analysis and experiments. Understanding the use of theories and models can shed light on the credibility and reproducibility of research works. Compared with metadata, such as title, author, keywords, etc., theory extraction in scientific literature is rarely explored, especially for social and behavioral science (SBS) domains. One challenge of applying supervised learning methods is the lack of a large number of labeled samples for training. In this paper, we propose an automated framework based on distant supervision that leverages entity mentions from Wikipedia to build a ground truth corpus consisting of more than 4500 automatically annotated sentences containing theory/model mentions. We use this corpus to train models for theory extraction in SBS papers. We compared four deep learning architectures and found the RoBERTa-BiLSTM-CRF is the best one with a precision as high as 89.72%. The model is promising to be conveniently extended to domains other than SBS. The code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/lamps-lab/theory.","PeriodicalId":146244,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","volume":"341-342 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory entity extraction for social and behavioral sciences papers using distant supervision\",\"authors\":\"Xin Wei, Lamia Salsabil, Jian Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3558100.3563855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theories and models, which are common in scientific papers in almost all domains, usually provide the foundations of theoretical analysis and experiments. Understanding the use of theories and models can shed light on the credibility and reproducibility of research works. Compared with metadata, such as title, author, keywords, etc., theory extraction in scientific literature is rarely explored, especially for social and behavioral science (SBS) domains. One challenge of applying supervised learning methods is the lack of a large number of labeled samples for training. In this paper, we propose an automated framework based on distant supervision that leverages entity mentions from Wikipedia to build a ground truth corpus consisting of more than 4500 automatically annotated sentences containing theory/model mentions. We use this corpus to train models for theory extraction in SBS papers. We compared four deep learning architectures and found the RoBERTa-BiLSTM-CRF is the best one with a precision as high as 89.72%. The model is promising to be conveniently extended to domains other than SBS. The code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/lamps-lab/theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"volume\":\"341-342 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3558100.3563855\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3558100.3563855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理论和模型在几乎所有领域的科学论文中都很常见,它们通常为理论分析和实验提供基础。理解理论和模型的使用可以阐明研究工作的可信度和可重复性。与标题、作者、关键词等元数据相比,科学文献中的理论提取很少被探索,特别是在社会和行为科学(SBS)领域。应用监督学习方法的一个挑战是缺乏大量用于训练的标记样本。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于远程监督的自动化框架,该框架利用维基百科中的实体提及来构建一个基础真理语料库,该语料库由超过4500个包含理论/模型提及的自动注释句子组成。我们使用这个语料库来训练SBS论文的理论提取模型。我们比较了四种深度学习架构,发现RoBERTa-BiLSTM-CRF是最好的,准确率高达89.72%。该模型有望方便地扩展到SBS以外的领域。代码和数据可在https://github.com/lamps-lab/theory上公开获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theory entity extraction for social and behavioral sciences papers using distant supervision
Theories and models, which are common in scientific papers in almost all domains, usually provide the foundations of theoretical analysis and experiments. Understanding the use of theories and models can shed light on the credibility and reproducibility of research works. Compared with metadata, such as title, author, keywords, etc., theory extraction in scientific literature is rarely explored, especially for social and behavioral science (SBS) domains. One challenge of applying supervised learning methods is the lack of a large number of labeled samples for training. In this paper, we propose an automated framework based on distant supervision that leverages entity mentions from Wikipedia to build a ground truth corpus consisting of more than 4500 automatically annotated sentences containing theory/model mentions. We use this corpus to train models for theory extraction in SBS papers. We compared four deep learning architectures and found the RoBERTa-BiLSTM-CRF is the best one with a precision as high as 89.72%. The model is promising to be conveniently extended to domains other than SBS. The code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/lamps-lab/theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信