并联混合动力推进与二次动力系统体系结构探索与评价

C. Lents, Zubair A. Baig, Russell D. Taylor
{"title":"并联混合动力推进与二次动力系统体系结构探索与评价","authors":"C. Lents, Zubair A. Baig, Russell D. Taylor","doi":"10.2514/6.2020-3555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The parallel hybrid turbofan propulsion (PHTF) system, with a high and low spool connected motor/generator, applied to a single aisle aircraft, has been study extensively and been shown to provide both gas turbine level and aircraft level benefits. With significant electrification of the propulsion system, the degree of subsystem electrification should also be considered. Thus this current study focuses on the PHTF, considering not only the PHTF operating modes but also the secondary power subsystems (electric, hydraulic, and pneumatic) which interface with the propulsion system. Secondary power subsystem options range from hydraulic or electric for actuation to pneumatic or electric for the environmental control system. Each combination has been explored and evaluated within the UTRC aircraft systems integrated model (ASIM) – architecture exploration and evaluation (AEE) framework to identify the aircraft subsystem architecture that best complements the preferred hybrid propulsion system, where the hybrid propulsion system encompasses low and high spool machine size, usage scenario, and boost power source. Energy cost reduction and technology risk are evaluated for each design space architecture. The results show that a mild PHTF, using a low level of stored electric energy is preferred with a combination of electric and hydraulic actuation, electric wing anti-ice, and electric engine accessories. A bleed and electric based pneumatic system, each pared with an ECS optimized for the type of pneumatic system show similar energy cost performance.","PeriodicalId":403355,"journal":{"name":"2020 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parallel Hybrid Propulsion & Secondary Power System Architecture Exploration and Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"C. Lents, Zubair A. Baig, Russell D. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/6.2020-3555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The parallel hybrid turbofan propulsion (PHTF) system, with a high and low spool connected motor/generator, applied to a single aisle aircraft, has been study extensively and been shown to provide both gas turbine level and aircraft level benefits. With significant electrification of the propulsion system, the degree of subsystem electrification should also be considered. Thus this current study focuses on the PHTF, considering not only the PHTF operating modes but also the secondary power subsystems (electric, hydraulic, and pneumatic) which interface with the propulsion system. Secondary power subsystem options range from hydraulic or electric for actuation to pneumatic or electric for the environmental control system. Each combination has been explored and evaluated within the UTRC aircraft systems integrated model (ASIM) – architecture exploration and evaluation (AEE) framework to identify the aircraft subsystem architecture that best complements the preferred hybrid propulsion system, where the hybrid propulsion system encompasses low and high spool machine size, usage scenario, and boost power source. Energy cost reduction and technology risk are evaluated for each design space architecture. The results show that a mild PHTF, using a low level of stored electric energy is preferred with a combination of electric and hydraulic actuation, electric wing anti-ice, and electric engine accessories. A bleed and electric based pneumatic system, each pared with an ECS optimized for the type of pneumatic system show similar energy cost performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-3555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-3555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

应用于单通道飞机的高、低轴连接电机/发电机的并联混合动力涡扇推进系统(PHTF)已经得到了广泛的研究,并被证明可以提供燃气轮机水平和飞机水平的双重效益。随着推进系统电气化程度的显著提高,还应考虑子系统的电气化程度。因此,目前的研究重点是PHTF,不仅考虑了PHTF的工作模式,还考虑了与推进系统接口的二次动力子系统(电动、液压和气动)。二次动力子系统的选择范围从液压或电动驱动到气动或电动环境控制系统。每种组合都在UTRC飞机系统集成模型(ASIM) -架构探索和评估(AEE)框架内进行了探索和评估,以确定最佳补充首选混合推进系统的飞机子系统架构,其中混合推进系统包括低轴机和高轴机尺寸,使用场景和增压电源。对每个设计空间架构进行能源成本降低和技术风险评估。结果表明,采用电动和液压驱动、电动机翼防冰和电动发动机附件相结合的方式,使用低水平储存的电能的轻度PHTF是首选。一种基于排气和电动的气动系统,与针对气动系统类型优化的ECS相比较,显示出相似的能源成本性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parallel Hybrid Propulsion & Secondary Power System Architecture Exploration and Evaluation
The parallel hybrid turbofan propulsion (PHTF) system, with a high and low spool connected motor/generator, applied to a single aisle aircraft, has been study extensively and been shown to provide both gas turbine level and aircraft level benefits. With significant electrification of the propulsion system, the degree of subsystem electrification should also be considered. Thus this current study focuses on the PHTF, considering not only the PHTF operating modes but also the secondary power subsystems (electric, hydraulic, and pneumatic) which interface with the propulsion system. Secondary power subsystem options range from hydraulic or electric for actuation to pneumatic or electric for the environmental control system. Each combination has been explored and evaluated within the UTRC aircraft systems integrated model (ASIM) – architecture exploration and evaluation (AEE) framework to identify the aircraft subsystem architecture that best complements the preferred hybrid propulsion system, where the hybrid propulsion system encompasses low and high spool machine size, usage scenario, and boost power source. Energy cost reduction and technology risk are evaluated for each design space architecture. The results show that a mild PHTF, using a low level of stored electric energy is preferred with a combination of electric and hydraulic actuation, electric wing anti-ice, and electric engine accessories. A bleed and electric based pneumatic system, each pared with an ECS optimized for the type of pneumatic system show similar energy cost performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信