大豆与香豆间作模式及微生物接种对土壤质量指标的影响

مینا باقری, میرحسن رسولی صدقیانی, محسن برین, اسماعیل رضایی
{"title":"大豆与香豆间作模式及微生物接种对土壤质量指标的影响","authors":"مینا باقری, میرحسن رسولی صدقیانی, محسن برین, اسماعیل رضایی","doi":"10.47176/jspi.11.3.6396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intercropping under microbial inoculation has been suggested as a method to improve the soil quality indices. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of microbial inoculation on some soil quality indices of moldavian balms-and bean-planted soils in sole cropping and intercropping. This experiment was carried out in the form of a factorial based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in greenhouse condition. Studied factors were microbial inoculation (AMF, PGPR, AMF+PGPR and without microbial inoculation) and planting patterns (sole cropping of moldavian balms and bean, 1 row moldavian balms + 1 row bean (1:1), 2 row moldavian balms + 2 row bean (2:2), 2 row moldavian balms + 1 row bean (2:1) and 1 row moldavian balms + 2 row bean (1:2)). At the end of the growth period, microbial respiration (BR), substrate-induced respiration (SIR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), metabolic quotient ( q CO 2 ) and carbon availability index (CAI) in moldavian balms-and bean-planted soils were determined. The results showed that the intercropping patterns and microbial inoculation had a significant effect on all soil quality indices, in moldavian balms and bean plantation. The BR and SIR in the 2:1 intercropping moldavian balm under PGPR+AMF inoculation were measured to be 1.21 and 1.17 times higher than those of sole cropping, respectively. The 2:1 intercropping with PGPR+AMF inoculation increased MBC by 1.11 and 1.24 times, as compared to sole cropping of bean-and moldavian balm-planted soils, respectively. Different intercropping patterns and microbial inoculation increased soil CAI and decreased q CO 2 . In general, the application of intercropping and the potential use of microorganisms could improve the soil quality indices.","PeriodicalId":185425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Some Soil Quality Indices as Influenced by the Intercropping Patterns of Bean and Moldavian Balms, and Microbial Inoculation\",\"authors\":\"مینا باقری, میرحسن رسولی صدقیانی, محسن برین, اسماعیل رضایی\",\"doi\":\"10.47176/jspi.11.3.6396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intercropping under microbial inoculation has been suggested as a method to improve the soil quality indices. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of microbial inoculation on some soil quality indices of moldavian balms-and bean-planted soils in sole cropping and intercropping. This experiment was carried out in the form of a factorial based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in greenhouse condition. Studied factors were microbial inoculation (AMF, PGPR, AMF+PGPR and without microbial inoculation) and planting patterns (sole cropping of moldavian balms and bean, 1 row moldavian balms + 1 row bean (1:1), 2 row moldavian balms + 2 row bean (2:2), 2 row moldavian balms + 1 row bean (2:1) and 1 row moldavian balms + 2 row bean (1:2)). At the end of the growth period, microbial respiration (BR), substrate-induced respiration (SIR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), metabolic quotient ( q CO 2 ) and carbon availability index (CAI) in moldavian balms-and bean-planted soils were determined. The results showed that the intercropping patterns and microbial inoculation had a significant effect on all soil quality indices, in moldavian balms and bean plantation. The BR and SIR in the 2:1 intercropping moldavian balm under PGPR+AMF inoculation were measured to be 1.21 and 1.17 times higher than those of sole cropping, respectively. The 2:1 intercropping with PGPR+AMF inoculation increased MBC by 1.11 and 1.24 times, as compared to sole cropping of bean-and moldavian balm-planted soils, respectively. Different intercropping patterns and microbial inoculation increased soil CAI and decreased q CO 2 . In general, the application of intercropping and the potential use of microorganisms could improve the soil quality indices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47176/jspi.11.3.6396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/jspi.11.3.6396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了微生物接种间作作为改善土壤质量指标的方法。本研究的目的是评价微生物接种对单作和间作油豆土壤部分土壤质量指标的影响。本试验在温室条件下采用全区随机设计,共3个重复。研究因素为微生物接种(AMF、PGPR、AMF+PGPR和不接种微生物)和种植模式(单种香油和大豆、1行香油+ 1行豆类(1:1)、2行香油+ 2行豆类(2:2)、2行香油+ 1行豆类(2:1)和1行香油+ 2行豆类(1:2))。在生育期结束时,测定了油松和大豆种植土壤的微生物呼吸(BR)、底物诱导呼吸(SIR)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)、代谢商(qco2)和碳有效性指数(CAI)。结果表明:间作模式和微生物接种对油豆园土壤质量指标均有显著影响。接种PGPR+AMF的2:1间作油葵的BR和SIR分别是单作的1.21倍和1.17倍。接种PGPR+AMF的2:1间作比单作大豆和油棕土壤的MBC分别提高1.11倍和1.24倍。不同间作模式和微生物接种增加了土壤CAI,降低了qco2。总的来说,间作和微生物的潜在利用可以改善土壤质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Some Soil Quality Indices as Influenced by the Intercropping Patterns of Bean and Moldavian Balms, and Microbial Inoculation
Intercropping under microbial inoculation has been suggested as a method to improve the soil quality indices. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of microbial inoculation on some soil quality indices of moldavian balms-and bean-planted soils in sole cropping and intercropping. This experiment was carried out in the form of a factorial based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in greenhouse condition. Studied factors were microbial inoculation (AMF, PGPR, AMF+PGPR and without microbial inoculation) and planting patterns (sole cropping of moldavian balms and bean, 1 row moldavian balms + 1 row bean (1:1), 2 row moldavian balms + 2 row bean (2:2), 2 row moldavian balms + 1 row bean (2:1) and 1 row moldavian balms + 2 row bean (1:2)). At the end of the growth period, microbial respiration (BR), substrate-induced respiration (SIR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), metabolic quotient ( q CO 2 ) and carbon availability index (CAI) in moldavian balms-and bean-planted soils were determined. The results showed that the intercropping patterns and microbial inoculation had a significant effect on all soil quality indices, in moldavian balms and bean plantation. The BR and SIR in the 2:1 intercropping moldavian balm under PGPR+AMF inoculation were measured to be 1.21 and 1.17 times higher than those of sole cropping, respectively. The 2:1 intercropping with PGPR+AMF inoculation increased MBC by 1.11 and 1.24 times, as compared to sole cropping of bean-and moldavian balm-planted soils, respectively. Different intercropping patterns and microbial inoculation increased soil CAI and decreased q CO 2 . In general, the application of intercropping and the potential use of microorganisms could improve the soil quality indices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信