Marta Celati
{"title":"Leon Battista Alberti’s Porcaria coniuratio","authors":"Marta Celati","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198863625.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The second chapter focuses on Leon Battista Alberti’s Porcaria coniuratio, the historical epistle on Stefano Porcari’s conspiracy against pope Nicholas V written immediately after the thwarted plot in 1453. The political perspective underlying Alberti’s text does not reflect a merely propagandistic view, but conversely is the expression of a complex and ambiguous political reading of the events. The analysis aims to shed light on Alberti’s unsettled political view, by examining not only the ideological standpoint that emerges in the epistle, but also the rhetorical and stylistic elements that permeate this work. In particular, specific attention is paid to both the choice of the epistolary genre, which is employed to produce a historiographical work and is combined with other literary forms, and the studied use of various classical models (Sallust, satirical authors, Cicero, etc.). The examination of this text, which is read in connection with other works by Alberti, reveals the humanist’s view on historiography, which occupies a pivotal position in the lively fifteenth-century debate on historical writing. Moreover, the analysis shows how the complex rhetorical and stylistic framework of the Porcaria coniuratio implicitly conveys Alberti’s uneasy political thought, which proves to be completely distant from any sympathy with the plotter. Although the epistle is informed by a questioning approach, it reveals the humanist’s disapproval of any attempt at overthrowing established governments. It also betrays Alberti’s problematizing attitude towards political power and his unresolved view on the intricate Roman political background.","PeriodicalId":270500,"journal":{"name":"Conspiracy Literature in Early Renaissance Italy","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conspiracy Literature in Early Renaissance Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198863625.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二章关注Leon Battista Alberti的Porcaria conconatio,这是一封关于Stefano Porcari阴谋反对教皇尼古拉斯五世的历史书信,写于1453年阴谋被挫败之后。阿尔伯蒂文本背后的政治观点并不仅仅反映了一种宣传观点,相反,它是对事件的复杂而模糊的政治解读的表达。分析的目的是阐明阿尔伯蒂的不稳定的政治观点,不仅检查意识形态的立场,出现在书信,但也修辞和风格的元素,渗透到这项工作。特别是,特别关注书信体裁的选择,这种体裁用于制作史学作品并与其他文学形式相结合,并研究了各种古典模式(萨洛斯特,讽刺作家,西塞罗等)的使用。对这篇文章的考察,与阿尔贝蒂的其他作品一起阅读,揭示了人文主义者对史学的看法,这在15世纪关于历史写作的激烈辩论中占据了关键地位。此外,分析还显示了《波卡里亚》复杂的修辞和风格框架如何隐含地传达了阿尔伯蒂不安的政治思想,这与对策划者的任何同情完全无关。虽然这封书信是通过质疑的方式来传达信息的,但它揭示了这位人文主义者对任何推翻现有政府的企图的反对。这也暴露了阿尔伯蒂对政治权力的质疑态度,以及他对错综复杂的罗马政治背景的不确定看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leon Battista Alberti’s Porcaria coniuratio
The second chapter focuses on Leon Battista Alberti’s Porcaria coniuratio, the historical epistle on Stefano Porcari’s conspiracy against pope Nicholas V written immediately after the thwarted plot in 1453. The political perspective underlying Alberti’s text does not reflect a merely propagandistic view, but conversely is the expression of a complex and ambiguous political reading of the events. The analysis aims to shed light on Alberti’s unsettled political view, by examining not only the ideological standpoint that emerges in the epistle, but also the rhetorical and stylistic elements that permeate this work. In particular, specific attention is paid to both the choice of the epistolary genre, which is employed to produce a historiographical work and is combined with other literary forms, and the studied use of various classical models (Sallust, satirical authors, Cicero, etc.). The examination of this text, which is read in connection with other works by Alberti, reveals the humanist’s view on historiography, which occupies a pivotal position in the lively fifteenth-century debate on historical writing. Moreover, the analysis shows how the complex rhetorical and stylistic framework of the Porcaria coniuratio implicitly conveys Alberti’s uneasy political thought, which proves to be completely distant from any sympathy with the plotter. Although the epistle is informed by a questioning approach, it reveals the humanist’s disapproval of any attempt at overthrowing established governments. It also betrays Alberti’s problematizing attitude towards political power and his unresolved view on the intricate Roman political background.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信