模型检查自组织网络路由协议:ARAN与endairA

Davide Benetti, Massimo Merro, L. Viganò
{"title":"模型检查自组织网络路由协议:ARAN与endairA","authors":"Davide Benetti, Massimo Merro, L. Viganò","doi":"10.1109/SEFM.2010.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several different secure routing protocols have been proposed for determining the appropriate paths on which data should be transmitted in ad hoc networks. In this paper, we focus on two of the most relevant such protocols, ARAN and end air A, and present the results of a formal analysis that we have carried out using the AVISPA Tool, an automated model checker for the analysis of security protocols. By model checking ARAN with the AVISPA Tool, we have discovered three attacks (a route disruption, a route diversion, and a creation of incorrect routing state), while our analysis of end air A revealed no attacks.","PeriodicalId":211760,"journal":{"name":"2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model Checking Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols: ARAN vs. endairA\",\"authors\":\"Davide Benetti, Massimo Merro, L. Viganò\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEFM.2010.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several different secure routing protocols have been proposed for determining the appropriate paths on which data should be transmitted in ad hoc networks. In this paper, we focus on two of the most relevant such protocols, ARAN and end air A, and present the results of a formal analysis that we have carried out using the AVISPA Tool, an automated model checker for the analysis of security protocols. By model checking ARAN with the AVISPA Tool, we have discovered three attacks (a route disruption, a route diversion, and a creation of incorrect routing state), while our analysis of end air A revealed no attacks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEFM.2010.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEFM.2010.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

已经提出了几种不同的安全路由协议,用于确定在自组织网络中传输数据的适当路径。在本文中,我们重点关注两个最相关的此类协议,ARAN和终端空气A,并介绍了我们使用AVISPA工具(用于分析安全协议的自动模型检查器)进行的形式化分析的结果。通过使用AVISPA工具对ARAN进行模型检查,我们发现了三种攻击(路由中断,路由改道和创建错误的路由状态),而我们对终端空气a的分析显示没有攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model Checking Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols: ARAN vs. endairA
Several different secure routing protocols have been proposed for determining the appropriate paths on which data should be transmitted in ad hoc networks. In this paper, we focus on two of the most relevant such protocols, ARAN and end air A, and present the results of a formal analysis that we have carried out using the AVISPA Tool, an automated model checker for the analysis of security protocols. By model checking ARAN with the AVISPA Tool, we have discovered three attacks (a route disruption, a route diversion, and a creation of incorrect routing state), while our analysis of end air A revealed no attacks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信