Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Hakam, HishamM K. Imam, H. A. Seif, N. A. Abbas
{"title":"心脏磁共振成像在心肌梗死诊断中的作用","authors":"Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Hakam, HishamM K. Imam, H. A. Seif, N. A. Abbas","doi":"10.11648/J.IJMI.20200804.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging provides an accurate and reproducible modality for the assessment of global ventricular volumes and function, and valuable in establishing a diagnosis of chronic and acute MI and distinguishing this condition from non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Aim: To evaluate the role of cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging technique in diagnosis of myocardial infarction, assessment of myocardial viability. Subject and Method: The study was conducted over a period of 3 years at Assiut University Hospital. Fifty-six patients were recruited. All patients were subjected to full history taking and radiological evaluation using a 1.5-T MR system and echocardiography. Agreement regarding segmental wall motion was assessed by using Cohen’s Kappa statistics. Also ejection fraction measurement by both modalities was compared using bland-Altman plots. Agreement between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and conventional coronary angiography in detection of diseased coronary arteries was examined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ). Results: It was found that ejection fraction detected by Echo were overestimated relative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging with statistically significant difference (p=0.004). While LV diameters detected by echocardiography were underestimated relative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Good agreement between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echo regarding segmental wall motion. There was positive very high correlation between the two modalities in evaluation of LV Functionality indices. Conclusion: CMR is superior to echo in evaluating left ventricular functionality indices with echo underestimating these indices except the ejection fraction which is overestimated by Echo. Moreover, CMR is better in evaluating post MI complications and associated cardiac abnormalities.","PeriodicalId":117142,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Hakam, HishamM K. Imam, H. A. Seif, N. A. Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.IJMI.20200804.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging provides an accurate and reproducible modality for the assessment of global ventricular volumes and function, and valuable in establishing a diagnosis of chronic and acute MI and distinguishing this condition from non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Aim: To evaluate the role of cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging technique in diagnosis of myocardial infarction, assessment of myocardial viability. Subject and Method: The study was conducted over a period of 3 years at Assiut University Hospital. Fifty-six patients were recruited. All patients were subjected to full history taking and radiological evaluation using a 1.5-T MR system and echocardiography. Agreement regarding segmental wall motion was assessed by using Cohen’s Kappa statistics. Also ejection fraction measurement by both modalities was compared using bland-Altman plots. Agreement between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and conventional coronary angiography in detection of diseased coronary arteries was examined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ). Results: It was found that ejection fraction detected by Echo were overestimated relative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging with statistically significant difference (p=0.004). While LV diameters detected by echocardiography were underestimated relative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Good agreement between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echo regarding segmental wall motion. There was positive very high correlation between the two modalities in evaluation of LV Functionality indices. Conclusion: CMR is superior to echo in evaluating left ventricular functionality indices with echo underestimating these indices except the ejection fraction which is overestimated by Echo. Moreover, CMR is better in evaluating post MI complications and associated cardiac abnormalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJMI.20200804.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJMI.20200804.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心脏磁共振成像为评估整体心室容量和功能提供了一种准确和可重复的模式,在建立慢性和急性心肌梗死的诊断以及将其与非缺血性心肌病区分开来方面具有价值。目的:探讨心脏磁共振成像技术在心肌梗死诊断、心肌活力评估中的应用价值。研究对象和方法:研究在阿西尤特大学医院进行了3年。共招募了56名患者。所有患者均接受完整的病史记录,并使用1.5 t MR系统和超声心动图进行放射学评估。采用Cohen’s Kappa统计来评估节段壁面运动的一致性。此外,用bland-Altman图比较了两种方法的射血分数测量。采用Cohen’s kappa系数(κ)比较磁共振成像与常规冠状动脉造影检测冠状动脉病变的一致性。结果:与磁共振成像相比,超声检测的射血分数被高估,差异有统计学意义(p=0.004)。而超声心动图检测的左室直径相对于磁共振成像被低估。磁共振成像与超声成像在节段壁运动方面的一致性较好。两种方法对左室功能指标的评价具有非常高的正相关。结论:CMR在评价左心室功能指标方面优于回声,除射血分数被回声高估外,其他指标均被回声低估。此外,CMR在评估心肌梗死后并发症和相关心脏异常方面效果更好。
Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction
Introduction: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging provides an accurate and reproducible modality for the assessment of global ventricular volumes and function, and valuable in establishing a diagnosis of chronic and acute MI and distinguishing this condition from non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. Aim: To evaluate the role of cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging technique in diagnosis of myocardial infarction, assessment of myocardial viability. Subject and Method: The study was conducted over a period of 3 years at Assiut University Hospital. Fifty-six patients were recruited. All patients were subjected to full history taking and radiological evaluation using a 1.5-T MR system and echocardiography. Agreement regarding segmental wall motion was assessed by using Cohen’s Kappa statistics. Also ejection fraction measurement by both modalities was compared using bland-Altman plots. Agreement between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and conventional coronary angiography in detection of diseased coronary arteries was examined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ). Results: It was found that ejection fraction detected by Echo were overestimated relative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging with statistically significant difference (p=0.004). While LV diameters detected by echocardiography were underestimated relative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Good agreement between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echo regarding segmental wall motion. There was positive very high correlation between the two modalities in evaluation of LV Functionality indices. Conclusion: CMR is superior to echo in evaluating left ventricular functionality indices with echo underestimating these indices except the ejection fraction which is overestimated by Echo. Moreover, CMR is better in evaluating post MI complications and associated cardiac abnormalities.