{"title":"为设计基于地方的创新政策绘制产业和地域维度:本书的基本原理","authors":"R. Capello, Alexander Kleibrink, M. Matusiak","doi":"10.4337/9781789905519.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smart specialisation is now a well-known strategy of the European Union (EU), due to its implementation in the 2014‒2020 period to boost the competitiveness of Europe and its regions. Prior to this, innovation activities were related primarily to research and development (R&D) expenditure. Smart specialisation aimed to change this, by embracing a much larger concept of innovation, insisting on the idea that entrepreneurial discovery was not based only in high-tech industries and in R&D activities. The one-size-fits-all policy of the Lisbon and Europe 2020 agenda was totally replaced, and the idea that innovation strategies had to be place-based (Barca, 2009), as a result of bottom-up processes based on the selfdiscovery of entrepreneurial capability, drove the present programming period 2014‒2020 (Giannitsis, 2009; Foray, 2009; Foray et al., 2009). The new policy strategy was therefore calling for an attempt to supersede the old innovation policy style, based on centralised planning methods for the identification of industrial development priorities. The new strategy was aiming to ensure the appropriateness of the logic and design of the policy, as well as the relevance of the local context, rather than this being imposed by an external (supra-regional) body, as with a place-based policy à la Barca (Barca, 2009). In addition to this redirection of innovation policy style, smart specialisation was asking for the identification of priorities, a policy prioritization capable of boosting growth, since it is based on regional","PeriodicalId":173178,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Methods for Place-Based Innovation Policy","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping industrial and territorial dimensions for the design of place-based innovation policies: the rationale of the book\",\"authors\":\"R. Capello, Alexander Kleibrink, M. Matusiak\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781789905519.00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Smart specialisation is now a well-known strategy of the European Union (EU), due to its implementation in the 2014‒2020 period to boost the competitiveness of Europe and its regions. Prior to this, innovation activities were related primarily to research and development (R&D) expenditure. Smart specialisation aimed to change this, by embracing a much larger concept of innovation, insisting on the idea that entrepreneurial discovery was not based only in high-tech industries and in R&D activities. The one-size-fits-all policy of the Lisbon and Europe 2020 agenda was totally replaced, and the idea that innovation strategies had to be place-based (Barca, 2009), as a result of bottom-up processes based on the selfdiscovery of entrepreneurial capability, drove the present programming period 2014‒2020 (Giannitsis, 2009; Foray, 2009; Foray et al., 2009). The new policy strategy was therefore calling for an attempt to supersede the old innovation policy style, based on centralised planning methods for the identification of industrial development priorities. The new strategy was aiming to ensure the appropriateness of the logic and design of the policy, as well as the relevance of the local context, rather than this being imposed by an external (supra-regional) body, as with a place-based policy à la Barca (Barca, 2009). In addition to this redirection of innovation policy style, smart specialisation was asking for the identification of priorities, a policy prioritization capable of boosting growth, since it is based on regional\",\"PeriodicalId\":173178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Methods for Place-Based Innovation Policy\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Methods for Place-Based Innovation Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905519.00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Methods for Place-Based Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905519.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
智能专业化现在是欧盟(EU)的一项众所周知的战略,因为它在2014-2020年期间实施,以提高欧洲及其地区的竞争力。在此之前,创新活动主要与研究与开发(R&D)支出有关。聪明的专业化旨在改变这种状况,方法是采用更广泛的创新概念,坚持认为创业发现不仅基于高科技产业和研发活动。里斯本和欧洲2020议程的一贯性政策被完全取代,创新战略必须基于地方的想法(Barca, 2009),作为基于创业能力自我发现的自下而上过程的结果,推动了目前的规划期2014-2020 (Giannitsis, 2009;尝试,2009;Foray et al., 2009)。因此,新的政策战略要求尝试以确定工业发展优先事项的集中规划方法为基础,取代旧的创新政策风格。新战略旨在确保政策的逻辑和设计的适当性,以及当地背景的相关性,而不是像la Barca (Barca, 2009)那样由外部(超区域)机构强加。除了这种创新政策风格的重定向之外,智能专业化还要求确定优先事项,这是一种能够促进增长的政策优先事项,因为它是基于区域的
Mapping industrial and territorial dimensions for the design of place-based innovation policies: the rationale of the book
Smart specialisation is now a well-known strategy of the European Union (EU), due to its implementation in the 2014‒2020 period to boost the competitiveness of Europe and its regions. Prior to this, innovation activities were related primarily to research and development (R&D) expenditure. Smart specialisation aimed to change this, by embracing a much larger concept of innovation, insisting on the idea that entrepreneurial discovery was not based only in high-tech industries and in R&D activities. The one-size-fits-all policy of the Lisbon and Europe 2020 agenda was totally replaced, and the idea that innovation strategies had to be place-based (Barca, 2009), as a result of bottom-up processes based on the selfdiscovery of entrepreneurial capability, drove the present programming period 2014‒2020 (Giannitsis, 2009; Foray, 2009; Foray et al., 2009). The new policy strategy was therefore calling for an attempt to supersede the old innovation policy style, based on centralised planning methods for the identification of industrial development priorities. The new strategy was aiming to ensure the appropriateness of the logic and design of the policy, as well as the relevance of the local context, rather than this being imposed by an external (supra-regional) body, as with a place-based policy à la Barca (Barca, 2009). In addition to this redirection of innovation policy style, smart specialisation was asking for the identification of priorities, a policy prioritization capable of boosting growth, since it is based on regional