公司在算法社会中的责任

H. Micklitz, A. A. Villanueva
{"title":"公司在算法社会中的责任","authors":"H. Micklitz, A. A. Villanueva","doi":"10.1017/9781108914857.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The major focus of the book is on the constitutional challenges of the algorithmic society. In the public/private divide type of thinking, such an approach puts the constitution and thereby the state into the limelight. There is a dense debate on the changing role of the nation-state in the aftermath of what is called globalization and how the transformation of the state is affecting private law and thereby private parties. This implies the question of whether the public/private divide can still serve as a useful tool to design responsibilities on both sides, public and private. If we ask for a constitutional framing of business activities in a globalized world, there are two possible approaches: the first is the external or the outer reach of national constitutions; the second the potential impact of a global constitution. Our approach is broader and narrower at the same time. It is broader as we do not look at the constitutional dimension alone, but at the public/private law below the constitution and at the role and impact on private responsibilities, it is narrower as we will neither engage in the debate on the external/outer reach of nation-state constitutions nor on the existence of a ‘Global Constitution’ or an ‘International Economic Constitution’, based on the GATT/WTO and international human rights. Such","PeriodicalId":183658,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsibilities of Companies in the Algorithmic Society\",\"authors\":\"H. Micklitz, A. A. Villanueva\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108914857.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The major focus of the book is on the constitutional challenges of the algorithmic society. In the public/private divide type of thinking, such an approach puts the constitution and thereby the state into the limelight. There is a dense debate on the changing role of the nation-state in the aftermath of what is called globalization and how the transformation of the state is affecting private law and thereby private parties. This implies the question of whether the public/private divide can still serve as a useful tool to design responsibilities on both sides, public and private. If we ask for a constitutional framing of business activities in a globalized world, there are two possible approaches: the first is the external or the outer reach of national constitutions; the second the potential impact of a global constitution. Our approach is broader and narrower at the same time. It is broader as we do not look at the constitutional dimension alone, but at the public/private law below the constitution and at the role and impact on private responsibilities, it is narrower as we will neither engage in the debate on the external/outer reach of nation-state constitutions nor on the existence of a ‘Global Constitution’ or an ‘International Economic Constitution’, based on the GATT/WTO and international human rights. Such\",\"PeriodicalId\":183658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书的主要焦点是算法社会的宪法挑战。在公私分界的思维中,这种方法将宪法置于聚光灯下,从而将国家置于聚光灯下。在所谓的全球化之后,关于民族国家角色的变化,以及国家的转变如何影响私法,从而影响私人政党,存在着激烈的辩论。这意味着公共/私人划分是否仍然可以作为设计双方(公共和私人)责任的有用工具的问题。如果我们要求在全球化的世界中为商业活动制定一个宪法框架,有两种可能的方法:第一种是国家宪法的外部或外部范围;第二个是全球宪法的潜在影响。我们的做法是同时扩大和缩小。它的范围更广,因为我们不仅关注宪法层面,而且关注宪法之下的公法/私法以及对私人责任的作用和影响;它的范围更窄,因为我们既不参与关于民族国家宪法的外部/外部范围的辩论,也不涉及基于关贸总协定/世贸组织和国际人权的“全球宪法”或“国际经济宪法”的存在。这样的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responsibilities of Companies in the Algorithmic Society
The major focus of the book is on the constitutional challenges of the algorithmic society. In the public/private divide type of thinking, such an approach puts the constitution and thereby the state into the limelight. There is a dense debate on the changing role of the nation-state in the aftermath of what is called globalization and how the transformation of the state is affecting private law and thereby private parties. This implies the question of whether the public/private divide can still serve as a useful tool to design responsibilities on both sides, public and private. If we ask for a constitutional framing of business activities in a globalized world, there are two possible approaches: the first is the external or the outer reach of national constitutions; the second the potential impact of a global constitution. Our approach is broader and narrower at the same time. It is broader as we do not look at the constitutional dimension alone, but at the public/private law below the constitution and at the role and impact on private responsibilities, it is narrower as we will neither engage in the debate on the external/outer reach of nation-state constitutions nor on the existence of a ‘Global Constitution’ or an ‘International Economic Constitution’, based on the GATT/WTO and international human rights. Such
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信