波兰尼和格林在梅洛-庞蒂

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.5840/traddisc202248317

P. Mullins

{"title":"波兰尼和格林在梅洛-庞蒂","authors":"P. Mullins","doi":"10.5840/traddisc202248317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This historically oriented essay treats Michael Polanyi and Marjorie Grene’s discussions of Maurice Merleau-Ponty in their correspondence in the 1960s. It traces Grene’s growing enthusiasm for Merleau-Ponty and notes both Polanyi’s criticism and praise for Merleau-Ponty’s perspective in relation to his account of tacit knowing. The essay also comments on Polanyi’s criticism of Gilbert Ryle and his effort to align his perspective with Francis Walsh’s and F. S. Rothchild’s neurophysiological ideas about the operation of mind. I discuss the innovative Ford Foundation-funded conference program, spearheaded by Polanyi and Grene, that brought together an interdisciplinary group of scholars interested in transforming the prevailing philosophical paradigm. This project is the context in which discussion about Merleau-Ponty, Polanyi, and other figures flourished and Grene produced a complicated but fascinating set of little-known publications.","PeriodicalId":199228,"journal":{"name":"Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polanyi and Grene on Merleau-Ponty\",\"authors\":\"P. Mullins\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/traddisc202248317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This historically oriented essay treats Michael Polanyi and Marjorie Grene’s discussions of Maurice Merleau-Ponty in their correspondence in the 1960s. It traces Grene’s growing enthusiasm for Merleau-Ponty and notes both Polanyi’s criticism and praise for Merleau-Ponty’s perspective in relation to his account of tacit knowing. The essay also comments on Polanyi’s criticism of Gilbert Ryle and his effort to align his perspective with Francis Walsh’s and F. S. Rothchild’s neurophysiological ideas about the operation of mind. I discuss the innovative Ford Foundation-funded conference program, spearheaded by Polanyi and Grene, that brought together an interdisciplinary group of scholars interested in transforming the prevailing philosophical paradigm. This project is the context in which discussion about Merleau-Ponty, Polanyi, and other figures flourished and Grene produced a complicated but fascinating set of little-known publications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc202248317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc202248317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇以历史为导向的文章探讨了迈克尔·波兰尼和马乔里·格林在20世纪60年代的通信中对莫里斯·梅洛-庞蒂的讨论。它追溯了格林对梅洛-庞蒂日益增长的热情，并注意到波兰尼对梅洛-庞蒂的观点的批评和赞扬，这与他对隐性知识的描述有关。这篇文章还评论了波兰尼对吉尔伯特·赖尔的批评，以及他努力将自己的观点与弗朗西斯·沃尔什和f·s·罗斯柴尔德关于思维运作的神经生理学观点结合起来。我将讨论由福特基金会资助的、由波兰尼和格林带头的创新会议项目，该项目汇集了一群对改变主流哲学范式感兴趣的跨学科学者。在这个项目的背景下，关于梅洛-庞蒂、波兰尼和其他人物的讨论蓬勃发展，格林出版了一系列复杂但引人入胜的鲜为人知的出版物。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Polanyi and Grene on Merleau-Ponty

This historically oriented essay treats Michael Polanyi and Marjorie Grene’s discussions of Maurice Merleau-Ponty in their correspondence in the 1960s. It traces Grene’s growing enthusiasm for Merleau-Ponty and notes both Polanyi’s criticism and praise for Merleau-Ponty’s perspective in relation to his account of tacit knowing. The essay also comments on Polanyi’s criticism of Gilbert Ryle and his effort to align his perspective with Francis Walsh’s and F. S. Rothchild’s neurophysiological ideas about the operation of mind. I discuss the innovative Ford Foundation-funded conference program, spearheaded by Polanyi and Grene, that brought together an interdisciplinary group of scholars interested in transforming the prevailing philosophical paradigm. This project is the context in which discussion about Merleau-Ponty, Polanyi, and other figures flourished and Grene produced a complicated but fascinating set of little-known publications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

自引率

0.00%

发文量