利用xLPR在易受PWSCC影响的异种金属对接焊缝小直径管嘴中先漏后破的应用

N. Cofie, D. Dedhia, Gary Dominguez, M. Uddin, C. Harrington, N. Glunt, D. Shim
{"title":"利用xLPR在易受PWSCC影响的异种金属对接焊缝小直径管嘴中先漏后破的应用","authors":"N. Cofie, D. Dedhia, Gary Dominguez, M. Uddin, C. Harrington, N. Glunt, D. Shim","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-86180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To address the dynamic effects of pipe break required by the General Design Criteria 4 (GDC-4), Appendix A of 10CFR50, deterministic leak-before-break (LBB) analysis (based on margins on leak rate and critical flaw size) as described in Standard Review Plan (SRP) 3.6.3 has been utilized by the nuclear industry. The LBB deterministic margins are generally met for large diameter piping (NPS 10 and greater) using a traditional LRD of 1.0 gpm. For smaller diameter piping, it is typically difficult to meet the required margins using LRD of 1.0 gpm necessitating a lower LRD. An alternate approach is to employ a probabilistic method to determine the probability of rupture and compare it to an appropriate probabilistic acceptance criterion. Recent release of the Extremely Low Probability of Rupture (xLPR) software has made the use of such a probabilistic approach possible.\n In this paper, a feasibility study was performed using xLPR to investigate if low probability of rupture can be demonstrated for a typical small diameter piping nozzle with a dissimilar metal (DM) butt weld that is susceptible to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). This study assumes a small surface crack and grows this crack to determine if rupture occurs by a through-wall crack or a surface crack. Several sensitivity studies were performed to investigate the effects of key input variables on the rupture probabilities.\n The study has shown that it is feasible to justify low probability of rupture for small diameter DM welds susceptible to PWSCC. However, the WRS profile used in the evaluation has strong influence on the probability of rupture. The study has also shown the limitations in applying the deterministic LBB approach on a broader basis to small diameter DM welds in the presence of PWSCC, since rupture by surface cracks instead of through-wall cacks cannot be summarily dismissed and is a fundamental assumption in deterministic LBB with SRP 3.6.3.","PeriodicalId":434862,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Leak-Before-Break to Small Diameter Piping Nozzles With Dissimilar Metal Butt Welds Susceptible to PWSCC Using xLPR\",\"authors\":\"N. Cofie, D. Dedhia, Gary Dominguez, M. Uddin, C. Harrington, N. Glunt, D. Shim\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2022-86180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n To address the dynamic effects of pipe break required by the General Design Criteria 4 (GDC-4), Appendix A of 10CFR50, deterministic leak-before-break (LBB) analysis (based on margins on leak rate and critical flaw size) as described in Standard Review Plan (SRP) 3.6.3 has been utilized by the nuclear industry. The LBB deterministic margins are generally met for large diameter piping (NPS 10 and greater) using a traditional LRD of 1.0 gpm. For smaller diameter piping, it is typically difficult to meet the required margins using LRD of 1.0 gpm necessitating a lower LRD. An alternate approach is to employ a probabilistic method to determine the probability of rupture and compare it to an appropriate probabilistic acceptance criterion. Recent release of the Extremely Low Probability of Rupture (xLPR) software has made the use of such a probabilistic approach possible.\\n In this paper, a feasibility study was performed using xLPR to investigate if low probability of rupture can be demonstrated for a typical small diameter piping nozzle with a dissimilar metal (DM) butt weld that is susceptible to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). This study assumes a small surface crack and grows this crack to determine if rupture occurs by a through-wall crack or a surface crack. Several sensitivity studies were performed to investigate the effects of key input variables on the rupture probabilities.\\n The study has shown that it is feasible to justify low probability of rupture for small diameter DM welds susceptible to PWSCC. However, the WRS profile used in the evaluation has strong influence on the probability of rupture. The study has also shown the limitations in applying the deterministic LBB approach on a broader basis to small diameter DM welds in the presence of PWSCC, since rupture by surface cracks instead of through-wall cacks cannot be summarily dismissed and is a fundamental assumption in deterministic LBB with SRP 3.6.3.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication\",\"volume\":\"2014 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-86180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4B: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-86180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决通用设计准则4 (GDC-4), 10CFR50附录A所要求的管道破裂的动态影响,核工业已采用标准评审计划(SRP) 3.6.3中描述的决定论破裂前泄漏(LBB)分析(基于泄漏率和临界缺陷尺寸的余量)。对于使用1.0 gpm的传统LRD的大直径管道(NPS 10或更大),通常满足LBB确定性裕度。对于较小直径的管道,使用1.0 gpm的LRD通常很难满足所需的余量,因此需要更低的LRD。另一种方法是采用概率方法来确定破裂的概率,并将其与适当的概率接受准则进行比较。最近发布的极低破裂概率(xLPR)软件使这种概率方法的使用成为可能。在本文中,使用xLPR进行了可行性研究,以研究是否可以证明具有易受初级水应力腐蚀开裂(PWSCC)的异种金属(DM)对接焊缝的典型小口径管道喷嘴具有低破裂概率。本研究假设有一个小的表面裂纹,并将其扩展,以确定破裂是由穿壁裂纹还是表面裂纹引起的。进行了几项敏感性研究,以调查关键输入变量对破裂概率的影响。研究表明,对于易受PWSCC影响的小直径DM焊缝,证明其低破裂概率是可行的。然而,在评估中使用的WRS剖面对破裂概率有很强的影响。该研究还表明,在存在PWSCC的情况下,在更广泛的基础上将确定性LBB方法应用于小直径DM焊缝的局限性,因为表面裂纹而不是穿壁裂纹的破裂不能被草率地忽视,这是SRP 3.6.3的确定性LBB的基本假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Leak-Before-Break to Small Diameter Piping Nozzles With Dissimilar Metal Butt Welds Susceptible to PWSCC Using xLPR
To address the dynamic effects of pipe break required by the General Design Criteria 4 (GDC-4), Appendix A of 10CFR50, deterministic leak-before-break (LBB) analysis (based on margins on leak rate and critical flaw size) as described in Standard Review Plan (SRP) 3.6.3 has been utilized by the nuclear industry. The LBB deterministic margins are generally met for large diameter piping (NPS 10 and greater) using a traditional LRD of 1.0 gpm. For smaller diameter piping, it is typically difficult to meet the required margins using LRD of 1.0 gpm necessitating a lower LRD. An alternate approach is to employ a probabilistic method to determine the probability of rupture and compare it to an appropriate probabilistic acceptance criterion. Recent release of the Extremely Low Probability of Rupture (xLPR) software has made the use of such a probabilistic approach possible. In this paper, a feasibility study was performed using xLPR to investigate if low probability of rupture can be demonstrated for a typical small diameter piping nozzle with a dissimilar metal (DM) butt weld that is susceptible to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). This study assumes a small surface crack and grows this crack to determine if rupture occurs by a through-wall crack or a surface crack. Several sensitivity studies were performed to investigate the effects of key input variables on the rupture probabilities. The study has shown that it is feasible to justify low probability of rupture for small diameter DM welds susceptible to PWSCC. However, the WRS profile used in the evaluation has strong influence on the probability of rupture. The study has also shown the limitations in applying the deterministic LBB approach on a broader basis to small diameter DM welds in the presence of PWSCC, since rupture by surface cracks instead of through-wall cacks cannot be summarily dismissed and is a fundamental assumption in deterministic LBB with SRP 3.6.3.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信