精神失常辩护决定的程序方面

T. L. Hafemeister
{"title":"精神失常辩护决定的程序方面","authors":"T. L. Hafemeister","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479804856.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Chapter 10 addresses the trial-related procedures used to evaluate an insanity defense, with the USSC generally having left it to the states to decide for themselves what procedures to employ. Although they often share some common features, the states have also adopted—like the numerous variations in their insanity tests—different procedures for generating related forensic mental health evaluations, reflecting the widespread uncertainty and disagreement over how to handle these cases. This chapter describes some of these procedures and the controversies associated with them.","PeriodicalId":185833,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Trials and Mental Disorders","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedural Aspects of Insanity Defense Determinations\",\"authors\":\"T. L. Hafemeister\",\"doi\":\"10.18574/nyu/9781479804856.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Chapter 10 addresses the trial-related procedures used to evaluate an insanity defense, with the USSC generally having left it to the states to decide for themselves what procedures to employ. Although they often share some common features, the states have also adopted—like the numerous variations in their insanity tests—different procedures for generating related forensic mental health evaluations, reflecting the widespread uncertainty and disagreement over how to handle these cases. This chapter describes some of these procedures and the controversies associated with them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Trials and Mental Disorders\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Trials and Mental Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479804856.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Trials and Mental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479804856.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第10章讨论了用于评估精神错乱辩护的审判相关程序,USSC通常将其留给各州自行决定采用何种程序。尽管它们通常有一些共同的特征,但各州也采用了不同的程序来产生相关的法医心理健康评估,就像他们的精神错乱测试的众多变化一样,反映了如何处理这些案件的普遍不确定性和分歧。本章描述了其中的一些程序以及与之相关的争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Procedural Aspects of Insanity Defense Determinations
Chapter 10 addresses the trial-related procedures used to evaluate an insanity defense, with the USSC generally having left it to the states to decide for themselves what procedures to employ. Although they often share some common features, the states have also adopted—like the numerous variations in their insanity tests—different procedures for generating related forensic mental health evaluations, reflecting the widespread uncertainty and disagreement over how to handle these cases. This chapter describes some of these procedures and the controversies associated with them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信