再论灵感与自由意志防御

Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology Pub Date : 2001-09-12 DOI:10.1163/27725472-07304004

W. Craig

{"title":"再论灵感与自由意志防御","authors":"W. Craig","doi":"10.1163/27725472-07304004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Christian Church has traditionally held that the inspiration of Holy Scripture is verbal, plenary, and confluent. But such an affirmation may seem to be incoherent. For if Scripture is the product of both divine and human free agency, then it seems impossible that God should have sufficient control of the various authors of Scripture so as to produce a Word that is verbally and plenarily his. A Molinist theory of divine middle knowledge can help us to break this deadlock and craft a doctrine of inspiration that is both orthodox and coherent.","PeriodicalId":134774,"journal":{"name":"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inspiration and the Freewill Defense Revisited\",\"authors\":\"W. Craig\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/27725472-07304004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Christian Church has traditionally held that the inspiration of Holy Scripture is verbal, plenary, and confluent. But such an affirmation may seem to be incoherent. For if Scripture is the product of both divine and human free agency, then it seems impossible that God should have sufficient control of the various authors of Scripture so as to produce a Word that is verbally and plenarily his. A Molinist theory of divine middle knowledge can help us to break this deadlock and craft a doctrine of inspiration that is both orthodox and coherent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-07304004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-07304004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

基督教会传统上认为圣经的启示是口头的、全面的和融合的。但这样的肯定似乎是不连贯的。因为，如果《圣经》是神和人自由代理的产物，那么上帝似乎不可能对《圣经》的不同作者有足够的控制，从而产生一种口头上和完全属于他的话语。莫林主义关于神圣中间知识的理论可以帮助我们打破这种僵局，创造一种既正统又连贯的灵感学说。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Inspiration and the Freewill Defense Revisited

The Christian Church has traditionally held that the inspiration of Holy Scripture is verbal, plenary, and confluent. But such an affirmation may seem to be incoherent. For if Scripture is the product of both divine and human free agency, then it seems impossible that God should have sufficient control of the various authors of Scripture so as to produce a Word that is verbally and plenarily his. A Molinist theory of divine middle knowledge can help us to break this deadlock and craft a doctrine of inspiration that is both orthodox and coherent.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量