{"title":"流动性保险与信贷供应:来自COVID-19危机的证据","authors":"Tumer Kapan, Camelia Minoiu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3773328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We exploit the unexpected surge in corporate credit line drawdowns in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic as a bank balance sheet shock and examine the impact on banks’ lending decisions. We show that banks with larger ex-ante credit line portfolios---and hence higher risk of drawdowns---reported tightening lending standards on new C\\&I loans to small and large firms, curtailed the supply of large syndicated loans, and reduced the number and volume of small business loans since March 2020. Exposed banks were also less likely to participate in and grant loans through government-sponsored credit programs such as the Paycheck Protection Program and the Main Street Lending Program. We document that the main mechanism by which the risk of credit line drawdowns likely affected banks' lending decisions was a reduction of risk tolerance rather than balance sheet (liquidity and capital) constraints. Our findings suggest that tension may arise during crises between banks providing liquidity insurance to firms through pre-committed credit lines while at the same time sustaining loan supply to the broader economy, with important implications for monetary policy and financial stability policies.","PeriodicalId":275096,"journal":{"name":"Monetary Economics: Financial System & Institutions eJournal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquidity Insurance vs. Credit Provision: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Tumer Kapan, Camelia Minoiu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3773328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We exploit the unexpected surge in corporate credit line drawdowns in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic as a bank balance sheet shock and examine the impact on banks’ lending decisions. We show that banks with larger ex-ante credit line portfolios---and hence higher risk of drawdowns---reported tightening lending standards on new C\\\\&I loans to small and large firms, curtailed the supply of large syndicated loans, and reduced the number and volume of small business loans since March 2020. Exposed banks were also less likely to participate in and grant loans through government-sponsored credit programs such as the Paycheck Protection Program and the Main Street Lending Program. We document that the main mechanism by which the risk of credit line drawdowns likely affected banks' lending decisions was a reduction of risk tolerance rather than balance sheet (liquidity and capital) constraints. Our findings suggest that tension may arise during crises between banks providing liquidity insurance to firms through pre-committed credit lines while at the same time sustaining loan supply to the broader economy, with important implications for monetary policy and financial stability policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monetary Economics: Financial System & Institutions eJournal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monetary Economics: Financial System & Institutions eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3773328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monetary Economics: Financial System & Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3773328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
摘要
我们将2019冠状病毒病疫情初期企业信贷额度意外大幅下降视为银行资产负债表冲击,并研究其对银行贷款决策的影响。我们的研究表明,自2020年3月以来,拥有更大的事先信贷额度组合(因此有更高的提现风险)的银行报告称,对小型和大型企业的新C\&I贷款收紧了贷款标准,减少了大型银团贷款的供应,并减少了小企业贷款的数量和规模。受影响的银行也不太可能参与政府资助的信贷项目,并通过这些项目发放贷款,比如“薪水保护计划”(Paycheck Protection Program)和“大街贷款计划”(Main Street Lending Program)。我们的文件表明,信贷额度下降的风险可能影响银行贷款决策的主要机制是风险承受能力的降低,而不是资产负债表(流动性和资本)约束的降低。我们的研究结果表明,在危机期间,银行之间可能会出现紧张局势,银行通过预先承诺的信贷额度为企业提供流动性保险,同时维持对更广泛经济的贷款供应,这对货币政策和金融稳定政策具有重要意义。
Liquidity Insurance vs. Credit Provision: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis
We exploit the unexpected surge in corporate credit line drawdowns in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic as a bank balance sheet shock and examine the impact on banks’ lending decisions. We show that banks with larger ex-ante credit line portfolios---and hence higher risk of drawdowns---reported tightening lending standards on new C\&I loans to small and large firms, curtailed the supply of large syndicated loans, and reduced the number and volume of small business loans since March 2020. Exposed banks were also less likely to participate in and grant loans through government-sponsored credit programs such as the Paycheck Protection Program and the Main Street Lending Program. We document that the main mechanism by which the risk of credit line drawdowns likely affected banks' lending decisions was a reduction of risk tolerance rather than balance sheet (liquidity and capital) constraints. Our findings suggest that tension may arise during crises between banks providing liquidity insurance to firms through pre-committed credit lines while at the same time sustaining loan supply to the broader economy, with important implications for monetary policy and financial stability policies.