{"title":"因素季节性的实证分析","authors":"F. Lam, Ya Li, G. Tang, Jing Xu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2908720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seasonalities in asset returns, including the January effect, the Halloween effect and the same-calendar-month effect, are widely documented in the literature. We show that a number of popular factors in the empirical asset pricing literature exhibit some well-known seasonalities. Most of the factor models we consider are able to effectively capture seasonalities in the returns of our test portfolios. Carhart four-factor performs the best in terms of explaining the seasonalities of underlying markets. It is the first attempt to empirically test Keloharju et al. (2016) hypothesis and extend it to compare asset pricing models.","PeriodicalId":130177,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Analysis of Factor Seasonalities\",\"authors\":\"F. Lam, Ya Li, G. Tang, Jing Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2908720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seasonalities in asset returns, including the January effect, the Halloween effect and the same-calendar-month effect, are widely documented in the literature. We show that a number of popular factors in the empirical asset pricing literature exhibit some well-known seasonalities. Most of the factor models we consider are able to effectively capture seasonalities in the returns of our test portfolios. Carhart four-factor performs the best in terms of explaining the seasonalities of underlying markets. It is the first attempt to empirically test Keloharju et al. (2016) hypothesis and extend it to compare asset pricing models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2908720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Asset Pricing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2908720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
资产回报的季节性,包括1月效应、万圣节效应和同月效应,在文献中得到了广泛的记录。我们表明,实证资产定价文献中的一些流行因素表现出一些众所周知的季节性。我们考虑的大多数因素模型都能够有效地捕获测试组合回报中的季节性。卡哈特四因子在解释基础市场的季节性方面表现最好。这是第一次尝试对Keloharju et al.(2016)的假设进行实证检验,并将其扩展到资产定价模型的比较。
Seasonalities in asset returns, including the January effect, the Halloween effect and the same-calendar-month effect, are widely documented in the literature. We show that a number of popular factors in the empirical asset pricing literature exhibit some well-known seasonalities. Most of the factor models we consider are able to effectively capture seasonalities in the returns of our test portfolios. Carhart four-factor performs the best in terms of explaining the seasonalities of underlying markets. It is the first attempt to empirically test Keloharju et al. (2016) hypothesis and extend it to compare asset pricing models.