{"title":"关于记录保存和最终结果报告制度的一些意见。","authors":"A H Sellers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Possible objectives to be served by a multiple source cancer data acquistion program and some limitations associated therewith are presented. Alternative approaches to on-going cancer data collection from multiple sources are briefly considered. Basic requirements of a cancer record keeping and end-results reporting system, and standard defintions, procedures, and rules relating thereto are indicated. Points which may be useful in reaching a decision on an on-going international collaborative data collection arrangement are noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":75670,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of otolaryngology","volume":"4 5","pages":"727-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some observations on a record keeping and end-results reporting system.\",\"authors\":\"A H Sellers\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Possible objectives to be served by a multiple source cancer data acquistion program and some limitations associated therewith are presented. Alternative approaches to on-going cancer data collection from multiple sources are briefly considered. Basic requirements of a cancer record keeping and end-results reporting system, and standard defintions, procedures, and rules relating thereto are indicated. Points which may be useful in reaching a decision on an on-going international collaborative data collection arrangement are noted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"727-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some observations on a record keeping and end-results reporting system.
Possible objectives to be served by a multiple source cancer data acquistion program and some limitations associated therewith are presented. Alternative approaches to on-going cancer data collection from multiple sources are briefly considered. Basic requirements of a cancer record keeping and end-results reporting system, and standard defintions, procedures, and rules relating thereto are indicated. Points which may be useful in reaching a decision on an on-going international collaborative data collection arrangement are noted.