国际“非戏剧”:文化冲突与格列佛的失败(1964)

S. Cavalli
{"title":"国际“非戏剧”:文化冲突与格列佛的失败(1964)","authors":"S. Cavalli","doi":"10.21825/JEPS.V3I1.8339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early Sixties, the international literary journal Gulliver involved intellectuals of different nationalities: the French Dionys Mascolo and Maurice Blanchot; the German Hans Magnus Enzensberger; the Italians Elio Vittorini, Francesco Leonetti and Italo Calvino. The distances between them were quite obvious from the start. It was not so much a geographical matter as a different conception of literary patterns and commitment. These difficulties worsened after the construction of the Berlin Wall: the urgency of German writers to reflect upon their historical condition collided with the French authors’ preference to represent contemporary society. In their correspondence, the discussions about planning an international journal became more important than actually making an international journal. Therefore, they never managed to reach an agreement on the structure of the journal itself - to the point that Leonetti, in a letter addressed to Vittorini in November 1962, clearly wrote of a ‘non-revue’. Gulliver was a unique experiment; it was published in 1964 as the seventh issue of the Italian literary journal Il Menabò (printed by Einaudi and edited by Vittorini and Calvino between 1959 and 1967). It is, undoubtedly, a failure of cultural mediation. However in the Italian scenario of that time, it represents one of the most relevant attempts to create a cross-border intellectual community, broaden national topics, and gain a European dimension.","PeriodicalId":142850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Periodical Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An International ‘Non-revue’: Cultural Conflict and the Failure of Gulliver (1964)\",\"authors\":\"S. Cavalli\",\"doi\":\"10.21825/JEPS.V3I1.8339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the early Sixties, the international literary journal Gulliver involved intellectuals of different nationalities: the French Dionys Mascolo and Maurice Blanchot; the German Hans Magnus Enzensberger; the Italians Elio Vittorini, Francesco Leonetti and Italo Calvino. The distances between them were quite obvious from the start. It was not so much a geographical matter as a different conception of literary patterns and commitment. These difficulties worsened after the construction of the Berlin Wall: the urgency of German writers to reflect upon their historical condition collided with the French authors’ preference to represent contemporary society. In their correspondence, the discussions about planning an international journal became more important than actually making an international journal. Therefore, they never managed to reach an agreement on the structure of the journal itself - to the point that Leonetti, in a letter addressed to Vittorini in November 1962, clearly wrote of a ‘non-revue’. Gulliver was a unique experiment; it was published in 1964 as the seventh issue of the Italian literary journal Il Menabò (printed by Einaudi and edited by Vittorini and Calvino between 1959 and 1967). It is, undoubtedly, a failure of cultural mediation. However in the Italian scenario of that time, it represents one of the most relevant attempts to create a cross-border intellectual community, broaden national topics, and gain a European dimension.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Periodical Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Periodical Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21825/JEPS.V3I1.8339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Periodical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/JEPS.V3I1.8339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

60年代初,国际文学杂志《格列佛》(Gulliver)吸引了来自不同国家的知识分子:法国的迪奥尼斯·马斯科洛(Dionys Mascolo)和莫里斯·布朗肖(Maurice Blanchot);德国人汉斯·马格努斯·恩岑斯贝格;意大利人埃利奥·维托里尼,弗朗西斯科·莱奥内蒂和伊塔洛·卡尔维诺。他们之间的距离从一开始就很明显。与其说这是一个地理问题,不如说是对文学模式和承诺的不同概念。这些困难在柏林墙建成后更加严重:德国作家反思自身历史状况的紧迫性与法国作家表现当代社会的偏好发生了冲突。在他们的通信中,关于策划一份国际期刊的讨论变得比实际制作一份国际期刊更重要。因此,他们从未就杂志本身的结构达成一致——以至于莱奥内蒂在1962年11月给维托里尼的一封信中,明确地写了“不评论”。格列佛是一个独特的实验;它于1964年作为意大利文学杂志Il Menabò的第七期出版(由Einaudi印刷,由Vittorini和Calvino编辑,1959年至1967年)。毫无疑问,这是文化调解的失败。然而,在当时意大利的情况下,它代表了最相关的尝试之一,即创建一个跨国界的知识社区,扩大国家主题,并获得欧洲维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An International ‘Non-revue’: Cultural Conflict and the Failure of Gulliver (1964)
In the early Sixties, the international literary journal Gulliver involved intellectuals of different nationalities: the French Dionys Mascolo and Maurice Blanchot; the German Hans Magnus Enzensberger; the Italians Elio Vittorini, Francesco Leonetti and Italo Calvino. The distances between them were quite obvious from the start. It was not so much a geographical matter as a different conception of literary patterns and commitment. These difficulties worsened after the construction of the Berlin Wall: the urgency of German writers to reflect upon their historical condition collided with the French authors’ preference to represent contemporary society. In their correspondence, the discussions about planning an international journal became more important than actually making an international journal. Therefore, they never managed to reach an agreement on the structure of the journal itself - to the point that Leonetti, in a letter addressed to Vittorini in November 1962, clearly wrote of a ‘non-revue’. Gulliver was a unique experiment; it was published in 1964 as the seventh issue of the Italian literary journal Il Menabò (printed by Einaudi and edited by Vittorini and Calvino between 1959 and 1967). It is, undoubtedly, a failure of cultural mediation. However in the Italian scenario of that time, it represents one of the most relevant attempts to create a cross-border intellectual community, broaden national topics, and gain a European dimension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信