PapagAI:反思性论文的自动反馈

Veronika Solopova, Adrian Gruszczynski, Eiad Rostom, Fritz Cremer, Sascha Witte, Chengming Zhang, Fernando Ramos L'opez Lea Plossl, Florian Hofmann, R. Romeike, Michaela Glaser-Zikuda, C. Benzmuller, Tim Landgraf
{"title":"PapagAI:反思性论文的自动反馈","authors":"Veronika Solopova, Adrian Gruszczynski, Eiad Rostom, Fritz Cremer, Sascha Witte, Chengming Zhang, Fernando Ramos L'opez Lea Plossl, Florian Hofmann, R. Romeike, Michaela Glaser-Zikuda, C. Benzmuller, Tim Landgraf","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2307.07523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Written reflective practice is a regular exercise pre-service teachers perform during their higher education. Usually, their lecturers are expected to provide individual feedback, which can be a challenging task to perform on a regular basis. In this paper, we present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system. We describe the components and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of our system compared to the state-of-art generative large language models. The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.","PeriodicalId":303369,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche Jahrestagung für Künstliche Intelligenz","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PapagAI: Automated Feedback for Reflective Essays\",\"authors\":\"Veronika Solopova, Adrian Gruszczynski, Eiad Rostom, Fritz Cremer, Sascha Witte, Chengming Zhang, Fernando Ramos L'opez Lea Plossl, Florian Hofmann, R. Romeike, Michaela Glaser-Zikuda, C. Benzmuller, Tim Landgraf\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2307.07523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Written reflective practice is a regular exercise pre-service teachers perform during their higher education. Usually, their lecturers are expected to provide individual feedback, which can be a challenging task to perform on a regular basis. In this paper, we present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system. We describe the components and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of our system compared to the state-of-art generative large language models. The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsche Jahrestagung für Künstliche Intelligenz\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsche Jahrestagung für Künstliche Intelligenz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.07523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche Jahrestagung für Künstliche Intelligenz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.07523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

书面反思练习是职前教师在接受高等教育期间进行的常规练习。通常,他们的讲师被期望提供个人反馈,这可能是一个具有挑战性的任务,定期执行。在本文中,我们提出了第一个基于教学理论的开源自动反馈工具,并作为混合人工智能系统实现。我们描述了组件,并讨论了与最先进的生成大型语言模型相比,我们的系统的优点和缺点。我们工作的主要目标是为学生提供更好的学习成果,并补充讲师的教学活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PapagAI: Automated Feedback for Reflective Essays
Written reflective practice is a regular exercise pre-service teachers perform during their higher education. Usually, their lecturers are expected to provide individual feedback, which can be a challenging task to perform on a regular basis. In this paper, we present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system. We describe the components and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of our system compared to the state-of-art generative large language models. The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信