正确的是使所有人受益的,或者是道德上正确的:关于道德倾向(结果主义与形式主义)如何影响道德领袖角色榜样的影响的调查

M. Osama, D. Siddiqui
{"title":"正确的是使所有人受益的,或者是道德上正确的:关于道德倾向(结果主义与形式主义)如何影响道德领袖角色榜样的影响的调查","authors":"M. Osama, D. Siddiqui","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3756685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to social learning theory, role models facilitate the acquisition of moral and other types of behavior. Yet, the question remains whether having had ethical role models influences one's perceptions of one’s ethical leadership and, if so, what kinds of role models are important. Even bigger questions remain do these role models change the thinking pattern on Ethical Standards of Judgment that is crucial in making them an ethical leader. We attempted to answer these questions by proposing a theoretical framework, drawing on Brown & Treviño (2014) conceptualization of role models and ethical leadership nexus, by focusing on the multiple types of ethical role models as antecedents of perceived ethical leadership, while making moral predispositions as mediating a factor. These predispositions are broadly based around two frameworks: consequentialism and formalism (the tendency to assess ethical situations in terms of their consequences to people, or, in terms of their consistent conformity to patterns or rules or some other formal features) Love et. al. (2020). We proposed that these dispositions are shaped by the role models and are instrumental in making a leader ethical. We explored three types of ethical role models: the leader’s childhood role models, career mentors, and top managers. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data was collected from 307 respondents working in the Pakistani corporate sector and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results suggested that Roles models don’t seem to exert any direct effect on ethical leadership (EL), however, career mentors have a positive indirect effect through both Consequentialism and Formalism, meaning these mentors inculcate the ethical predispositions of both Consequentialism and Formalism, and both, in turn, affect EL. Similarly, childhood role models also promote Consequentialist thinking which also has a positive effect on EL. Moreover, Ages also seem to have a positive impact on EL, moreover, it also complements the effect of career mentors on EL, meaning the influence of these mentors on EL are more pronounces in higher Age respondents. We found no effect on top management ethical role models. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":267169,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Organizational Psychology eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right Is what that Benefits All, or that which Is Morally Correct: An Enquiry on How Ethical Predispositions (Consequentialism Vs Formalism) Influence the effect of Role Models on Ethical Leader\",\"authors\":\"M. Osama, D. Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3756685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to social learning theory, role models facilitate the acquisition of moral and other types of behavior. Yet, the question remains whether having had ethical role models influences one's perceptions of one’s ethical leadership and, if so, what kinds of role models are important. Even bigger questions remain do these role models change the thinking pattern on Ethical Standards of Judgment that is crucial in making them an ethical leader. We attempted to answer these questions by proposing a theoretical framework, drawing on Brown & Treviño (2014) conceptualization of role models and ethical leadership nexus, by focusing on the multiple types of ethical role models as antecedents of perceived ethical leadership, while making moral predispositions as mediating a factor. These predispositions are broadly based around two frameworks: consequentialism and formalism (the tendency to assess ethical situations in terms of their consequences to people, or, in terms of their consistent conformity to patterns or rules or some other formal features) Love et. al. (2020). We proposed that these dispositions are shaped by the role models and are instrumental in making a leader ethical. We explored three types of ethical role models: the leader’s childhood role models, career mentors, and top managers. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data was collected from 307 respondents working in the Pakistani corporate sector and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results suggested that Roles models don’t seem to exert any direct effect on ethical leadership (EL), however, career mentors have a positive indirect effect through both Consequentialism and Formalism, meaning these mentors inculcate the ethical predispositions of both Consequentialism and Formalism, and both, in turn, affect EL. Similarly, childhood role models also promote Consequentialist thinking which also has a positive effect on EL. Moreover, Ages also seem to have a positive impact on EL, moreover, it also complements the effect of career mentors on EL, meaning the influence of these mentors on EL are more pronounces in higher Age respondents. We found no effect on top management ethical role models. Implications for research and practice are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial & Organizational Psychology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial & Organizational Psychology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Organizational Psychology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据社会学习理论,角色榜样有助于道德和其他类型行为的习得。然而,问题仍然是,拥有道德榜样是否会影响一个人对道德领导的看法,如果是的话,什么样的榜样是重要的。更大的问题仍然存在,这些榜样是否改变了道德判断标准的思维模式,这对他们成为道德领袖至关重要。我们试图通过提出一个理论框架来回答这些问题。Treviño(2014)通过将多种类型的道德榜样作为感知道德领导的前因,同时将道德倾向作为中介因素,将角色榜样和道德领导关系概念化。这些倾向大致基于两个框架:结果主义和形式主义(根据其对人们的后果,或者根据其对模式或规则或其他一些形式特征的一致性来评估道德状况的倾向)Love等人(2020)。我们提出,这些性格是由榜样塑造的,并有助于使领导者有道德。我们探索了三种类型的道德榜样:领导者童年的榜样、职业导师和高层管理者。实证效度是通过封闭式问卷调查建立的。数据从307名在巴基斯坦企业部门工作的受访者中收集,并使用验证性因素分析和结构化方程模型进行分析。结果表明,角色模式似乎对伦理领导(EL)没有任何直接影响,然而,职业导师通过结果主义和形式主义都有积极的间接影响,这意味着这些导师灌输了结果主义和形式主义的伦理倾向,而两者又反过来影响EL。同样,童年时期的角色榜样也会促进结果主义思维,这对语言学习也有积极的影响。此外,年龄似乎也对学习能力有积极的影响,而且它还补充了职业导师对学习能力的影响,即职业导师对学习能力的影响在年龄越高的被调查对象中更为明显。我们发现对高层管理人员的道德榜样没有影响。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Right Is what that Benefits All, or that which Is Morally Correct: An Enquiry on How Ethical Predispositions (Consequentialism Vs Formalism) Influence the effect of Role Models on Ethical Leader
According to social learning theory, role models facilitate the acquisition of moral and other types of behavior. Yet, the question remains whether having had ethical role models influences one's perceptions of one’s ethical leadership and, if so, what kinds of role models are important. Even bigger questions remain do these role models change the thinking pattern on Ethical Standards of Judgment that is crucial in making them an ethical leader. We attempted to answer these questions by proposing a theoretical framework, drawing on Brown & Treviño (2014) conceptualization of role models and ethical leadership nexus, by focusing on the multiple types of ethical role models as antecedents of perceived ethical leadership, while making moral predispositions as mediating a factor. These predispositions are broadly based around two frameworks: consequentialism and formalism (the tendency to assess ethical situations in terms of their consequences to people, or, in terms of their consistent conformity to patterns or rules or some other formal features) Love et. al. (2020). We proposed that these dispositions are shaped by the role models and are instrumental in making a leader ethical. We explored three types of ethical role models: the leader’s childhood role models, career mentors, and top managers. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data was collected from 307 respondents working in the Pakistani corporate sector and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results suggested that Roles models don’t seem to exert any direct effect on ethical leadership (EL), however, career mentors have a positive indirect effect through both Consequentialism and Formalism, meaning these mentors inculcate the ethical predispositions of both Consequentialism and Formalism, and both, in turn, affect EL. Similarly, childhood role models also promote Consequentialist thinking which also has a positive effect on EL. Moreover, Ages also seem to have a positive impact on EL, moreover, it also complements the effect of career mentors on EL, meaning the influence of these mentors on EL are more pronounces in higher Age respondents. We found no effect on top management ethical role models. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信