调和21世纪初观测到的欧亚变冷原因的相互矛盾的证据

S. Outten, Camille Li, M. King, L. Suo, P. Y. F. Siew, H. Cheung, Richard Davy, E. Dunn‐Sigouin, T. Furevik, Shengping He, E. Madonna, S. Sobolowski, T. Spengler, T. Woollings
{"title":"调和21世纪初观测到的欧亚变冷原因的相互矛盾的证据","authors":"S. Outten, Camille Li, M. King, L. Suo, P. Y. F. Siew, H. Cheung, Richard Davy, E. Dunn‐Sigouin, T. Furevik, Shengping He, E. Madonna, S. Sobolowski, T. Spengler, T. Woollings","doi":"10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. It is now well established that the Arctic is warming at a faster rate than the global average. This warming, which has been accompanied by a dramatic decline in sea ice, has been linked to cooling over the Eurasian subcontinent over recent decades, most dramatically during the period 1998–2012. This is a counter-intuitive impact under global warming given that land regions should warm more than ocean (and the global average). Some studies have proposed a causal teleconnection from Arctic sea-ice retreat to Eurasian wintertime cooling; other studies argue that Eurasian cooling is mainly driven by internal variability. Overall, there is an impression of strong disagreement between those holding the “ice-driven” versus “internal variability” viewpoints. Here, we offer an alternative framing showing that the sea ice and internal variability views can be compatible. Key to this is viewing Eurasian cooling through the lens of dynamics (linked primarily to internal variability with some potential contribution from sea ice; cools Eurasia) and thermodynamics (linked to sea-ice retreat; warms Eurasia). This approach, combined with recognition that there is uncertainty in the hypothesized mechanisms themselves, allows both viewpoints (and others) to co-exist and contribute to our understanding of Eurasian cooling. A simple autoregressive model shows that Eurasian cooling of this magnitude is consistent with internal variability, with some periods exhibiting stronger cooling than others, either by chance or by forced changes. Rather than posit a “yes-or-no” causal relationship between sea ice and Eurasian cooling, a more constructive way forward is to consider whether the cooling trend was more likely given the observed sea-ice loss, as well as other sources of low-frequency variability. Taken in this way both sea ice and internal variability are factors that affect the likelihood of strong regional cooling in the presence of ongoing global warming.\n","PeriodicalId":383272,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconciling conflicting evidence for the cause of the observed early 21st century Eurasian cooling\",\"authors\":\"S. Outten, Camille Li, M. King, L. Suo, P. Y. F. Siew, H. Cheung, Richard Davy, E. Dunn‐Sigouin, T. Furevik, Shengping He, E. Madonna, S. Sobolowski, T. Spengler, T. Woollings\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. It is now well established that the Arctic is warming at a faster rate than the global average. This warming, which has been accompanied by a dramatic decline in sea ice, has been linked to cooling over the Eurasian subcontinent over recent decades, most dramatically during the period 1998–2012. This is a counter-intuitive impact under global warming given that land regions should warm more than ocean (and the global average). Some studies have proposed a causal teleconnection from Arctic sea-ice retreat to Eurasian wintertime cooling; other studies argue that Eurasian cooling is mainly driven by internal variability. Overall, there is an impression of strong disagreement between those holding the “ice-driven” versus “internal variability” viewpoints. Here, we offer an alternative framing showing that the sea ice and internal variability views can be compatible. Key to this is viewing Eurasian cooling through the lens of dynamics (linked primarily to internal variability with some potential contribution from sea ice; cools Eurasia) and thermodynamics (linked to sea-ice retreat; warms Eurasia). This approach, combined with recognition that there is uncertainty in the hypothesized mechanisms themselves, allows both viewpoints (and others) to co-exist and contribute to our understanding of Eurasian cooling. A simple autoregressive model shows that Eurasian cooling of this magnitude is consistent with internal variability, with some periods exhibiting stronger cooling than others, either by chance or by forced changes. Rather than posit a “yes-or-no” causal relationship between sea ice and Eurasian cooling, a more constructive way forward is to consider whether the cooling trend was more likely given the observed sea-ice loss, as well as other sources of low-frequency variability. Taken in this way both sea ice and internal variability are factors that affect the likelihood of strong regional cooling in the presence of ongoing global warming.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":383272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Climate Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Climate Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要现在已经确定,北极正在以比全球平均速度更快的速度变暖。这种变暖伴随着海冰的急剧减少,与近几十年来欧亚次大陆的变冷有关,其中1998-2012年期间的变冷最为显著。在全球变暖的情况下,考虑到陆地地区应该比海洋(以及全球平均水平)变暖更多,这是一个违反直觉的影响。一些研究提出了北极海冰退缩与欧亚冬季降温之间的因果遥相关;其他研究认为,欧亚大陆的变冷主要是由内部变异性驱动的。总的来说,持“冰驱动”和“内部变异性”观点的人之间存在强烈分歧。在这里,我们提供了另一种框架,表明海冰和内部变异性的观点可以兼容。解决这一问题的关键是通过动力学的视角来看待欧亚大陆的变冷(主要与内部变率有关,其中包括海冰的一些潜在贡献;冷却欧亚大陆)和热力学(与海冰退缩有关;温暖欧亚大陆)。这种方法,结合对假设机制本身存在不确定性的认识,使两种观点(和其他观点)共存,有助于我们对欧亚冷却的理解。一个简单的自回归模式表明,欧亚大陆如此大的降温与内部变率是一致的,有些时期的降温比其他时期更强,要么是偶然的,要么是被迫的变化。与其假设海冰和欧亚变冷之间存在“是或否”的因果关系,更有建设性的方法是考虑到观测到的海冰损失,以及其他低频变率的来源,变冷趋势是否更有可能。这样看来,海冰和内部变率都是在全球持续变暖的情况下影响区域变冷可能性的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconciling conflicting evidence for the cause of the observed early 21st century Eurasian cooling
Abstract. It is now well established that the Arctic is warming at a faster rate than the global average. This warming, which has been accompanied by a dramatic decline in sea ice, has been linked to cooling over the Eurasian subcontinent over recent decades, most dramatically during the period 1998–2012. This is a counter-intuitive impact under global warming given that land regions should warm more than ocean (and the global average). Some studies have proposed a causal teleconnection from Arctic sea-ice retreat to Eurasian wintertime cooling; other studies argue that Eurasian cooling is mainly driven by internal variability. Overall, there is an impression of strong disagreement between those holding the “ice-driven” versus “internal variability” viewpoints. Here, we offer an alternative framing showing that the sea ice and internal variability views can be compatible. Key to this is viewing Eurasian cooling through the lens of dynamics (linked primarily to internal variability with some potential contribution from sea ice; cools Eurasia) and thermodynamics (linked to sea-ice retreat; warms Eurasia). This approach, combined with recognition that there is uncertainty in the hypothesized mechanisms themselves, allows both viewpoints (and others) to co-exist and contribute to our understanding of Eurasian cooling. A simple autoregressive model shows that Eurasian cooling of this magnitude is consistent with internal variability, with some periods exhibiting stronger cooling than others, either by chance or by forced changes. Rather than posit a “yes-or-no” causal relationship between sea ice and Eurasian cooling, a more constructive way forward is to consider whether the cooling trend was more likely given the observed sea-ice loss, as well as other sources of low-frequency variability. Taken in this way both sea ice and internal variability are factors that affect the likelihood of strong regional cooling in the presence of ongoing global warming.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信