VLSD数据库的异步视图维护

Parag Agrawal, Adam Silberstein, Brian F. Cooper, U. Srivastava, R. Ramakrishnan
{"title":"VLSD数据库的异步视图维护","authors":"Parag Agrawal, Adam Silberstein, Brian F. Cooper, U. Srivastava, R. Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.1145/1559845.1559866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The query models of the recent generation of very large scale distributed (VLSD) shared-nothing data storage systems, including our own PNUTS and others (e.g. BigTable, Dynamo, Cassandra, etc.) are intentionally simple, focusing on simple lookups and scans and trading query expressiveness for massive scale. Indexes and views can expand the query expressiveness of such systems by materializing more complex access paths and query results. In this paper, we examine mechanisms to implement indexes and views in a massive scale distributed database. For web applications, minimizing update latencies is critical, so we advocate deferring the work of maintaining views and indexes as much as possible. We examine the design space, and conclude that two types of view implementations, called remote view tables (RVTs) and local view tables (LVTs), provide good tradeoff between system throughput and minimizing view staleness. We describe how to construct and maintain such view tables, and how they can be used to implement indexes, group-by-aggregate views, equijoin views and selection views. We also introduce and analyze a consistency model that makes it easier for application developers to cope with the impact of deferred view maintenance. An empirical evaluation quantifies the maintenance costs of our views, and shows that they can significantly improve the cost of evaluating complex queries.","PeriodicalId":344093,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"84","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asynchronous view maintenance for VLSD databases\",\"authors\":\"Parag Agrawal, Adam Silberstein, Brian F. Cooper, U. Srivastava, R. Ramakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1559845.1559866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The query models of the recent generation of very large scale distributed (VLSD) shared-nothing data storage systems, including our own PNUTS and others (e.g. BigTable, Dynamo, Cassandra, etc.) are intentionally simple, focusing on simple lookups and scans and trading query expressiveness for massive scale. Indexes and views can expand the query expressiveness of such systems by materializing more complex access paths and query results. In this paper, we examine mechanisms to implement indexes and views in a massive scale distributed database. For web applications, minimizing update latencies is critical, so we advocate deferring the work of maintaining views and indexes as much as possible. We examine the design space, and conclude that two types of view implementations, called remote view tables (RVTs) and local view tables (LVTs), provide good tradeoff between system throughput and minimizing view staleness. We describe how to construct and maintain such view tables, and how they can be used to implement indexes, group-by-aggregate views, equijoin views and selection views. We also introduce and analyze a consistency model that makes it easier for application developers to cope with the impact of deferred view maintenance. An empirical evaluation quantifies the maintenance costs of our views, and shows that they can significantly improve the cost of evaluating complex queries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"84\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1559845.1559866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1559845.1559866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

摘要

最近一代的超大规模分布式(VLSD)无共享数据存储系统的查询模型,包括我们自己的PNUTS和其他系统(例如BigTable、Dynamo、Cassandra等)都有意设计得很简单,专注于简单的查找和扫描,并为大规模的数据交换查询表达能力。索引和视图可以通过具体化更复杂的访问路径和查询结果来扩展这类系统的查询表达能力。在本文中,我们研究了在大规模分布式数据库中实现索引和视图的机制。对于web应用程序,最小化更新延迟是至关重要的,因此我们提倡尽可能推迟维护视图和索引的工作。我们检查了设计空间,并得出结论,两种类型的视图实现,称为远程视图表(rvt)和本地视图表(lvt),在系统吞吐量和最小化视图过时之间提供了很好的权衡。我们描述了如何构造和维护这样的视图表,以及如何使用它们来实现索引、分组聚合视图、等同连接视图和选择视图。我们还介绍并分析了一个一致性模型,该模型使应用程序开发人员更容易处理延迟视图维护的影响。经验评估量化了视图的维护成本,并表明它们可以显著提高评估复杂查询的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asynchronous view maintenance for VLSD databases
The query models of the recent generation of very large scale distributed (VLSD) shared-nothing data storage systems, including our own PNUTS and others (e.g. BigTable, Dynamo, Cassandra, etc.) are intentionally simple, focusing on simple lookups and scans and trading query expressiveness for massive scale. Indexes and views can expand the query expressiveness of such systems by materializing more complex access paths and query results. In this paper, we examine mechanisms to implement indexes and views in a massive scale distributed database. For web applications, minimizing update latencies is critical, so we advocate deferring the work of maintaining views and indexes as much as possible. We examine the design space, and conclude that two types of view implementations, called remote view tables (RVTs) and local view tables (LVTs), provide good tradeoff between system throughput and minimizing view staleness. We describe how to construct and maintain such view tables, and how they can be used to implement indexes, group-by-aggregate views, equijoin views and selection views. We also introduce and analyze a consistency model that makes it easier for application developers to cope with the impact of deferred view maintenance. An empirical evaluation quantifies the maintenance costs of our views, and shows that they can significantly improve the cost of evaluating complex queries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信