锁和事务的移动性

Granville Barnett, S. Qin
{"title":"锁和事务的移动性","authors":"Granville Barnett, S. Qin","doi":"10.1109/TASE.2012.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locks are pervasive in multithreaded code. For software transactional memory (STM) to be widely adopted there must be a consensus on a semantics for programs that entail both locks and transactions, particularly for weakly isolated STMs. For instance, in a weakly isolated STM, use of both locks and transactions to access the same data may introduce data races. In response we present a simple and intuitive semantics that guarantees ordered linearisation points for conflicting locks and transactions. Our approach allows us to classify the moverness of locks and transactions, making reasoning about parallel compositions trivial. Under our semantics we show locks to be left movers and transactions right movers, and the serialisability of conflicting locks and transactions.","PeriodicalId":417979,"journal":{"name":"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moverness for Locks and Transactions\",\"authors\":\"Granville Barnett, S. Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TASE.2012.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Locks are pervasive in multithreaded code. For software transactional memory (STM) to be widely adopted there must be a consensus on a semantics for programs that entail both locks and transactions, particularly for weakly isolated STMs. For instance, in a weakly isolated STM, use of both locks and transactions to access the same data may introduce data races. In response we present a simple and intuitive semantics that guarantees ordered linearisation points for conflicting locks and transactions. Our approach allows us to classify the moverness of locks and transactions, making reasoning about parallel compositions trivial. Under our semantics we show locks to be left movers and transactions right movers, and the serialisability of conflicting locks and transactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

锁在多线程代码中非常普遍。为了广泛采用软件事务性内存(STM),必须在涉及锁和事务的程序的语义上达成一致,特别是对于弱隔离的STM。例如,在弱隔离的STM中,同时使用锁和事务来访问相同的数据可能会引入数据竞争。作为回应,我们提出了一个简单直观的语义,保证冲突锁和事务的有序线性化点。我们的方法允许我们对锁和事务的移动进行分类,使得对并行组合的推理变得微不足道。在我们的语义下,我们将锁显示为左移者,事务显示为右移者,以及冲突锁和事务的序列化性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moverness for Locks and Transactions
Locks are pervasive in multithreaded code. For software transactional memory (STM) to be widely adopted there must be a consensus on a semantics for programs that entail both locks and transactions, particularly for weakly isolated STMs. For instance, in a weakly isolated STM, use of both locks and transactions to access the same data may introduce data races. In response we present a simple and intuitive semantics that guarantees ordered linearisation points for conflicting locks and transactions. Our approach allows us to classify the moverness of locks and transactions, making reasoning about parallel compositions trivial. Under our semantics we show locks to be left movers and transactions right movers, and the serialisability of conflicting locks and transactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信