自由贸易区竞争力:印尼与东盟国家比较

S. Wahyuni, Esther Sri Astuti S. A.
{"title":"自由贸易区竞争力:印尼与东盟国家比较","authors":"S. Wahyuni, Esther Sri Astuti S. A.","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1867832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the Indonesian economic policy is to alleviate poverty and increase employment. The existence of Free trade zone area or special zones (SEZ) have been proven to help countries in fostering economic growth. Some of the key characteristics of successful zones are that they offer immediate access to high quality infrastructure, clearly titled land, facilities, and support services. In addition streamlined regulatory enforcement, simpler business establishment rules, expedited customs administration and other special administrative and approval procedures are also offered in such zones.This paper is trying to help the government to improve FTZ policies in Indonesia by providing a benchmark to other FTZ countries such as China, India, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. While China has the most established SEZ program, Malaysia and Thailand also have highly-regarded SEZs and investment incentives. Vietnam and India have gotten into the SEZ competition more recently and are still working out kinks in their policies. Those neighboring countries have developed SEZs in significant quantities but the greatest returns have come from a subsection of large-scale zones with favorable locations, good planning and access to resources. Thailand has a smaller number of Zones, but a higher rate of successful zones. How the position of Indonesia compare to nine Asean countries is becoming the main question of this study.","PeriodicalId":213910,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets: Regional Perspective eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitiveness of Free Trade Zone Area: Comparison between Indonesia & ASEAN Countries\",\"authors\":\"S. Wahyuni, Esther Sri Astuti S. A.\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1867832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the Indonesian economic policy is to alleviate poverty and increase employment. The existence of Free trade zone area or special zones (SEZ) have been proven to help countries in fostering economic growth. Some of the key characteristics of successful zones are that they offer immediate access to high quality infrastructure, clearly titled land, facilities, and support services. In addition streamlined regulatory enforcement, simpler business establishment rules, expedited customs administration and other special administrative and approval procedures are also offered in such zones.This paper is trying to help the government to improve FTZ policies in Indonesia by providing a benchmark to other FTZ countries such as China, India, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. While China has the most established SEZ program, Malaysia and Thailand also have highly-regarded SEZs and investment incentives. Vietnam and India have gotten into the SEZ competition more recently and are still working out kinks in their policies. Those neighboring countries have developed SEZs in significant quantities but the greatest returns have come from a subsection of large-scale zones with favorable locations, good planning and access to resources. Thailand has a smaller number of Zones, but a higher rate of successful zones. How the position of Indonesia compare to nine Asean countries is becoming the main question of this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging Markets: Regional Perspective eJournal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging Markets: Regional Perspective eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1867832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets: Regional Perspective eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1867832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

印度尼西亚经济政策的目标是减轻贫困和增加就业。自由贸易区或特区(SEZ)的存在已被证明有助于各国促进经济增长。成功开发区的一些关键特征是,它们提供高质量的基础设施、明确的土地、设施和支持服务。此外,这些区域还提供精简的管理执法、简化的企业设立规则、加快的海关管理和其他特别行政和批准程序。本文试图通过为中国、印度、马来西亚、泰国和越南等其他自贸区国家提供基准,帮助政府改善印尼的自贸区政策。虽然中国拥有最成熟的经济特区计划,但马来西亚和泰国也有备受推崇的经济特区和投资激励措施。越南和印度最近也加入了经济特区的竞争,并仍在制定政策。这些邻国已经大量开发了经济特区,但最大的回报来自于地理位置优越、规划良好、资源可及的大规模经济特区。泰国的特区数量较少,但成功率较高。印尼与九个东盟国家相比,其地位如何成为本研究的主要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competitiveness of Free Trade Zone Area: Comparison between Indonesia & ASEAN Countries
The objective of the Indonesian economic policy is to alleviate poverty and increase employment. The existence of Free trade zone area or special zones (SEZ) have been proven to help countries in fostering economic growth. Some of the key characteristics of successful zones are that they offer immediate access to high quality infrastructure, clearly titled land, facilities, and support services. In addition streamlined regulatory enforcement, simpler business establishment rules, expedited customs administration and other special administrative and approval procedures are also offered in such zones.This paper is trying to help the government to improve FTZ policies in Indonesia by providing a benchmark to other FTZ countries such as China, India, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. While China has the most established SEZ program, Malaysia and Thailand also have highly-regarded SEZs and investment incentives. Vietnam and India have gotten into the SEZ competition more recently and are still working out kinks in their policies. Those neighboring countries have developed SEZs in significant quantities but the greatest returns have come from a subsection of large-scale zones with favorable locations, good planning and access to resources. Thailand has a smaller number of Zones, but a higher rate of successful zones. How the position of Indonesia compare to nine Asean countries is becoming the main question of this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信