传感器响应时间对机器人气源定位影响的实验分析

Pepe Ojeda, J. Monroy, Javier González
{"title":"传感器响应时间对机器人气源定位影响的实验分析","authors":"Pepe Ojeda, J. Monroy, Javier González","doi":"10.1109/ISOEN54820.2022.9789652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robotic olfaction is a promising application of volatile-sensing technologies with many potential uses, such as gas leak detection or rescue missions. The effectiveness of any proposal to cope with this task is partially limited by the characteristics of the sensors employed. Most of the small, low-power sensing devices that are appropriate for mobile robotics suffer from problems like slow response time, long recovery, or low selectivity; and this makes the search process slower and less robust. In this work, we seek to provide a preliminary quantification of the effect of these issues in the results of a state-of-the-art gas source localization method. By using high-fidelity gas dispersion simulations, we compare the behaviour of the robotic agent when attaining measurements from a realistic sensor, with modelled response delay and inaccuracy, versus an idealized one that returns the ground-truth gas concentration value instantly. We find that, for slow-response sensors, there is a clear improvement of the results as the robot is allowed to gather measurements for a longer period of time, giving the sensor time to stabilize. A fast-responding sensor, on the other hand, does not benefit from very long measurement steps, needing only a small time window to account for instantaneous instabilities in the spatial dispersion of the gas.","PeriodicalId":427373,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Analysis of the Impact of Sensor Response Time on Robotic Gas Source Localization\",\"authors\":\"Pepe Ojeda, J. Monroy, Javier González\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISOEN54820.2022.9789652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robotic olfaction is a promising application of volatile-sensing technologies with many potential uses, such as gas leak detection or rescue missions. The effectiveness of any proposal to cope with this task is partially limited by the characteristics of the sensors employed. Most of the small, low-power sensing devices that are appropriate for mobile robotics suffer from problems like slow response time, long recovery, or low selectivity; and this makes the search process slower and less robust. In this work, we seek to provide a preliminary quantification of the effect of these issues in the results of a state-of-the-art gas source localization method. By using high-fidelity gas dispersion simulations, we compare the behaviour of the robotic agent when attaining measurements from a realistic sensor, with modelled response delay and inaccuracy, versus an idealized one that returns the ground-truth gas concentration value instantly. We find that, for slow-response sensors, there is a clear improvement of the results as the robot is allowed to gather measurements for a longer period of time, giving the sensor time to stabilize. A fast-responding sensor, on the other hand, does not benefit from very long measurement steps, needing only a small time window to account for instantaneous instabilities in the spatial dispersion of the gas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISOEN54820.2022.9789652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISOEN54820.2022.9789652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人嗅觉是挥发物传感技术的一个很有前途的应用,具有许多潜在的用途,如气体泄漏检测或救援任务。处理这一任务的任何建议的有效性部分地受到所采用的传感器特性的限制。大多数适用于移动机器人的小型、低功耗传感设备都存在响应时间慢、恢复时间长或选择性低等问题;这使得搜索过程更慢,更不健壮。在这项工作中,我们试图在最先进的气源定位方法的结果中提供这些问题的影响的初步量化。通过使用高保真气体分散模拟,我们比较了机器人代理在从现实传感器获得测量值时的行为,具有建模的响应延迟和不准确性,与立即返回基本真实气体浓度值的理想传感器。我们发现,对于慢响应传感器,有一个明显的改进结果,因为机器人被允许收集更长的一段时间的测量,给传感器时间稳定。另一方面,快速响应传感器不需要很长的测量步骤,只需要很小的时间窗口来考虑气体空间分散的瞬时不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Analysis of the Impact of Sensor Response Time on Robotic Gas Source Localization
Robotic olfaction is a promising application of volatile-sensing technologies with many potential uses, such as gas leak detection or rescue missions. The effectiveness of any proposal to cope with this task is partially limited by the characteristics of the sensors employed. Most of the small, low-power sensing devices that are appropriate for mobile robotics suffer from problems like slow response time, long recovery, or low selectivity; and this makes the search process slower and less robust. In this work, we seek to provide a preliminary quantification of the effect of these issues in the results of a state-of-the-art gas source localization method. By using high-fidelity gas dispersion simulations, we compare the behaviour of the robotic agent when attaining measurements from a realistic sensor, with modelled response delay and inaccuracy, versus an idealized one that returns the ground-truth gas concentration value instantly. We find that, for slow-response sensors, there is a clear improvement of the results as the robot is allowed to gather measurements for a longer period of time, giving the sensor time to stabilize. A fast-responding sensor, on the other hand, does not benefit from very long measurement steps, needing only a small time window to account for instantaneous instabilities in the spatial dispersion of the gas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信