DID和VC:为信任网络解开去中心化标识符和可验证凭证的纠缠

Clemens Brunner, Ulrich Gallersdörfer, F. Knirsch, D. Engel, F. Matthes
{"title":"DID和VC:为信任网络解开去中心化标识符和可验证凭证的纠缠","authors":"Clemens Brunner, Ulrich Gallersdörfer, F. Knirsch, D. Engel, F. Matthes","doi":"10.1145/3446983.3446992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials have been proposed as a self-sovereign and privacy-friendly alternative to centralized and proprietary authentication services. Currently, a W3C standard exists that attempts to unify existing proposals and to find a common layer for decentralized identification and verification. However, there are some limitations of decentralized identifiers in comparison to established, centrally controlled authentication platforms concerning trust, privacy and usability. In this paper, we first describe all workflows which are necessary to create, share and verify a verifiable credential and second, we discuss the limitations concerning trust, privacy and usability of decentralized identifiers. The paper summarizes the involved workflows for decentralized authentication as proposed by the current standard. Further, we show the existing limitations and shortcomings that need to be considered when sharing DID for practical implementations and give an overview of possible solutions and future directions.","PeriodicalId":222303,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DID and VC:Untangling Decentralized Identifiers and Verifiable Credentials for the Web of Trust\",\"authors\":\"Clemens Brunner, Ulrich Gallersdörfer, F. Knirsch, D. Engel, F. Matthes\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3446983.3446992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials have been proposed as a self-sovereign and privacy-friendly alternative to centralized and proprietary authentication services. Currently, a W3C standard exists that attempts to unify existing proposals and to find a common layer for decentralized identification and verification. However, there are some limitations of decentralized identifiers in comparison to established, centrally controlled authentication platforms concerning trust, privacy and usability. In this paper, we first describe all workflows which are necessary to create, share and verify a verifiable credential and second, we discuss the limitations concerning trust, privacy and usability of decentralized identifiers. The paper summarizes the involved workflows for decentralized authentication as proposed by the current standard. Further, we show the existing limitations and shortcomings that need to be considered when sharing DID for practical implementations and give an overview of possible solutions and future directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3446983.3446992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3446983.3446992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

去中心化标识符和可验证凭证已被提议作为一种自我主权和隐私友好的替代方案,以取代中心化和专有的身份验证服务。目前,存在一个W3C标准,它试图统一现有的提案,并为分散的标识和验证找到一个通用层。然而,与已建立的、集中控制的身份验证平台相比,去中心化标识符在信任、隐私和可用性方面存在一些局限性。在本文中,我们首先描述了创建、共享和验证可验证凭证所需的所有工作流程,其次,我们讨论了分散标识符在信任、隐私和可用性方面的限制。本文总结了当前标准提出的去中心化认证所涉及的工作流程。此外,我们还展示了在实际实现中共享DID时需要考虑的现有限制和缺点,并概述了可能的解决方案和未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DID and VC:Untangling Decentralized Identifiers and Verifiable Credentials for the Web of Trust
Decentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials have been proposed as a self-sovereign and privacy-friendly alternative to centralized and proprietary authentication services. Currently, a W3C standard exists that attempts to unify existing proposals and to find a common layer for decentralized identification and verification. However, there are some limitations of decentralized identifiers in comparison to established, centrally controlled authentication platforms concerning trust, privacy and usability. In this paper, we first describe all workflows which are necessary to create, share and verify a verifiable credential and second, we discuss the limitations concerning trust, privacy and usability of decentralized identifiers. The paper summarizes the involved workflows for decentralized authentication as proposed by the current standard. Further, we show the existing limitations and shortcomings that need to be considered when sharing DID for practical implementations and give an overview of possible solutions and future directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信