非分离双向中继DF信道的分集多路复用权衡

A. Singh, P. Elia, K. Gowda, D. Gesbert
{"title":"非分离双向中继DF信道的分集多路复用权衡","authors":"A. Singh, P. Elia, K. Gowda, D. Gesbert","doi":"10.1109/SPAWC.2011.5990393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work establishes the diversity-multiplexing tradeoff (DMT) of the four-phase decode-and-forward (DF) protocol in the half-duplex, non-separated two-way relay channel. We consider a fading channel model where the source relay links are Rayleigh distributed but the direct link between sources is left more general as Nakagami-m distributed and investigate for any possible gains in the achievable DMT using four-phase hybrid broadcast (HBC) protocol, as compared to three-phase time-division broadcast (TDBC) protocol. For the statistically symmetric case of Rayleigh fading and asymmetric fading with more stable direct link (m > 1), the optimal DMT of the HBC protocol is computed, and is shown to be achieved by a three-phase orthogonal variant, TDBC protocol. The operational meaning of this result is that the multiple access channel (MAC) phase of HBC protocol is not necessary to achieve optimal performance, this results in a simplification of the communication protocol. For less stable direct link (1 over 2 ≤ m < 1), the analysis establishes that the MAC phase of HBC protocol is necessary to achieve optimal DMT.","PeriodicalId":102244,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity-multiplexing tradeoff for the non-separated two-way relay DF channel\",\"authors\":\"A. Singh, P. Elia, K. Gowda, D. Gesbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPAWC.2011.5990393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work establishes the diversity-multiplexing tradeoff (DMT) of the four-phase decode-and-forward (DF) protocol in the half-duplex, non-separated two-way relay channel. We consider a fading channel model where the source relay links are Rayleigh distributed but the direct link between sources is left more general as Nakagami-m distributed and investigate for any possible gains in the achievable DMT using four-phase hybrid broadcast (HBC) protocol, as compared to three-phase time-division broadcast (TDBC) protocol. For the statistically symmetric case of Rayleigh fading and asymmetric fading with more stable direct link (m > 1), the optimal DMT of the HBC protocol is computed, and is shown to be achieved by a three-phase orthogonal variant, TDBC protocol. The operational meaning of this result is that the multiple access channel (MAC) phase of HBC protocol is not necessary to achieve optimal performance, this results in a simplification of the communication protocol. For less stable direct link (1 over 2 ≤ m < 1), the analysis establishes that the MAC phase of HBC protocol is necessary to achieve optimal DMT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPAWC.2011.5990393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPAWC.2011.5990393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本工作在半双工、非分离双向中继信道中建立了四相解码转发(DF)协议的分集复用权衡(DMT)。我们考虑了一个衰落信道模型,其中源中继链路是瑞利分布的,但源之间的直接链接更一般地保留为Nakagami-m分布,并研究了与三相时分广播(TDBC)协议相比,使用四相混合广播(HBC)协议可实现的DMT中的任何可能增益。对于瑞利衰落和非对称衰落的统计对称情况下,直接链路更稳定(m > 1),计算了HBC协议的最优DMT,并证明了通过三相正交变体TDBC协议可以实现。该结果的操作意义是,HBC协议的多址通道(MAC)阶段不是实现最佳性能所必需的,这导致了通信协议的简化。对于不太稳定的直接连杆(1 / 2≤m <1)分析确定了HBC协议的MAC阶段是实现最优DMT的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diversity-multiplexing tradeoff for the non-separated two-way relay DF channel
This work establishes the diversity-multiplexing tradeoff (DMT) of the four-phase decode-and-forward (DF) protocol in the half-duplex, non-separated two-way relay channel. We consider a fading channel model where the source relay links are Rayleigh distributed but the direct link between sources is left more general as Nakagami-m distributed and investigate for any possible gains in the achievable DMT using four-phase hybrid broadcast (HBC) protocol, as compared to three-phase time-division broadcast (TDBC) protocol. For the statistically symmetric case of Rayleigh fading and asymmetric fading with more stable direct link (m > 1), the optimal DMT of the HBC protocol is computed, and is shown to be achieved by a three-phase orthogonal variant, TDBC protocol. The operational meaning of this result is that the multiple access channel (MAC) phase of HBC protocol is not necessary to achieve optimal performance, this results in a simplification of the communication protocol. For less stable direct link (1 over 2 ≤ m < 1), the analysis establishes that the MAC phase of HBC protocol is necessary to achieve optimal DMT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信