{"title":"5. 论德意志帝国的“新性道德”话语——罗伯特·米歇尔斯在妇女运动、社会民主主义与社会学之间的性伦理","authors":"Vincent Streichhahn","doi":"10.1515/9783110751451-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on Robert Michels (1876– 1936) tends to think of the sociologist from the end. In the reception of the public, Michels appears predominantly as an elite theorist, whose classic Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy1 of 1911 reflects his disappointment with representative democracy on the one hand, and in which, on the other hand, the “nucleus of an authoritarian understanding of politics” is laid out, which predestined him as Benito Mussolini’s (1883– 1945) later Fascism apologete. This study, read as a disappointment in Michels’ former democratic hopes, would have led him ultimately from social democracy via syndicalism to Italian Fascism.2 Other works and thus different strands of interpretation are largely unknown compared to Political Parties. In the same year as Michels’ classic, however, another work was published, which is the focus of this article and has the potential to shake up the previous reception, namely Sexual Ethics: A Study of Borderland Questions.3 This “sexual-","PeriodicalId":126475,"journal":{"name":"Marriage Discourses","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5. On the Discourse of the “New Sexual Morality” in the German Empire: Robert Michels’ Sexual Ethics between Women’s Movement, Social Democracy, and Sociology\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Streichhahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110751451-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on Robert Michels (1876– 1936) tends to think of the sociologist from the end. In the reception of the public, Michels appears predominantly as an elite theorist, whose classic Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy1 of 1911 reflects his disappointment with representative democracy on the one hand, and in which, on the other hand, the “nucleus of an authoritarian understanding of politics” is laid out, which predestined him as Benito Mussolini’s (1883– 1945) later Fascism apologete. This study, read as a disappointment in Michels’ former democratic hopes, would have led him ultimately from social democracy via syndicalism to Italian Fascism.2 Other works and thus different strands of interpretation are largely unknown compared to Political Parties. In the same year as Michels’ classic, however, another work was published, which is the focus of this article and has the potential to shake up the previous reception, namely Sexual Ethics: A Study of Borderland Questions.3 This “sexual-\",\"PeriodicalId\":126475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marriage Discourses\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marriage Discourses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110751451-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marriage Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110751451-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
5. On the Discourse of the “New Sexual Morality” in the German Empire: Robert Michels’ Sexual Ethics between Women’s Movement, Social Democracy, and Sociology
Research on Robert Michels (1876– 1936) tends to think of the sociologist from the end. In the reception of the public, Michels appears predominantly as an elite theorist, whose classic Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy1 of 1911 reflects his disappointment with representative democracy on the one hand, and in which, on the other hand, the “nucleus of an authoritarian understanding of politics” is laid out, which predestined him as Benito Mussolini’s (1883– 1945) later Fascism apologete. This study, read as a disappointment in Michels’ former democratic hopes, would have led him ultimately from social democracy via syndicalism to Italian Fascism.2 Other works and thus different strands of interpretation are largely unknown compared to Political Parties. In the same year as Michels’ classic, however, another work was published, which is the focus of this article and has the potential to shake up the previous reception, namely Sexual Ethics: A Study of Borderland Questions.3 This “sexual-