走向死亡超越理论

R. Hood, R. J. Morris
{"title":"走向死亡超越理论","authors":"R. Hood, R. J. Morris","doi":"10.2307/1385773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A preliminary theory of death transcendence is proposed that neither assumes that persons are pervasively motivated to \"deny death\" nor that immortality is conceptually or empirically impossible. Using categories from Lifton's work, five cognitive modes of death transcendence are proposed, the creative, nature, biosocial, religious, and mysticism. Scales to measure these modes were devised based on factor analysis of items in a large sample (N = 587). These scales were subsequently correlated with Spilka's Fear of Death scales in one sample (N = 342), and with Spilka's death perspective and the Allport and Ross intrinsic/extrinsic scales in another sample (N = 105). In a final study, interviews with a sample of older adults (N = 39) allowed categorization of participants on each of Lifton's categories and these were correlated with intrinsic/extrinsic religiosity and Spilka's Death perspective scales. In all samples, meaningful patterns of correlations were obtained indicating the usefulness of our preliminary theoretical concerns. A cognitive theory of death transcendence in opposition to widely postulated \"denial\" theories seems fruitful. In addition, the special linkage between cognitive modes of death transcendence and mysticism is discussed.","PeriodicalId":175594,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Mystical Experiences","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Theory of Death Transcendence\",\"authors\":\"R. Hood, R. J. Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1385773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A preliminary theory of death transcendence is proposed that neither assumes that persons are pervasively motivated to \\\"deny death\\\" nor that immortality is conceptually or empirically impossible. Using categories from Lifton's work, five cognitive modes of death transcendence are proposed, the creative, nature, biosocial, religious, and mysticism. Scales to measure these modes were devised based on factor analysis of items in a large sample (N = 587). These scales were subsequently correlated with Spilka's Fear of Death scales in one sample (N = 342), and with Spilka's death perspective and the Allport and Ross intrinsic/extrinsic scales in another sample (N = 105). In a final study, interviews with a sample of older adults (N = 39) allowed categorization of participants on each of Lifton's categories and these were correlated with intrinsic/extrinsic religiosity and Spilka's Death perspective scales. In all samples, meaningful patterns of correlations were obtained indicating the usefulness of our preliminary theoretical concerns. A cognitive theory of death transcendence in opposition to widely postulated \\\"denial\\\" theories seems fruitful. In addition, the special linkage between cognitive modes of death transcendence and mysticism is discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dimensions of Mystical Experiences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dimensions of Mystical Experiences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1385773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Mystical Experiences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1385773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

一个初步的死亡超越理论被提出,既不假设人们普遍有动机“否认死亡”,也不假设不朽在概念上或经验上是不可能的。根据利夫顿作品的分类,提出了五种死亡超越的认知模式:创造性、自然、生物社会、宗教和神秘主义。测量这些模式的量表是基于对大样本项目(N = 587)的因子分析而设计的。这些量表随后在一个样本(N = 342)中与斯皮卡的死亡恐惧量表相关,在另一个样本(N = 105)中与斯皮卡的死亡视角和Allport和Ross内在/外在量表相关。在最后一项研究中,对老年人样本(N = 39)的访谈允许根据Lifton的每个类别对参与者进行分类,这些类别与内在/外在宗教虔诚度和Spilka的死亡视角量表相关。在所有样本中,获得了有意义的相关性模式,表明我们初步理论关注的有用性。与广泛假定的“否认”理论相反,死亡超越的认知理论似乎硕果累累。此外,还讨论了死亡超越认知模式与神秘主义之间的特殊联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a Theory of Death Transcendence
A preliminary theory of death transcendence is proposed that neither assumes that persons are pervasively motivated to "deny death" nor that immortality is conceptually or empirically impossible. Using categories from Lifton's work, five cognitive modes of death transcendence are proposed, the creative, nature, biosocial, religious, and mysticism. Scales to measure these modes were devised based on factor analysis of items in a large sample (N = 587). These scales were subsequently correlated with Spilka's Fear of Death scales in one sample (N = 342), and with Spilka's death perspective and the Allport and Ross intrinsic/extrinsic scales in another sample (N = 105). In a final study, interviews with a sample of older adults (N = 39) allowed categorization of participants on each of Lifton's categories and these were correlated with intrinsic/extrinsic religiosity and Spilka's Death perspective scales. In all samples, meaningful patterns of correlations were obtained indicating the usefulness of our preliminary theoretical concerns. A cognitive theory of death transcendence in opposition to widely postulated "denial" theories seems fruitful. In addition, the special linkage between cognitive modes of death transcendence and mysticism is discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信