{"title":"主流媒体话语围绕顶端手术在新西兰:定性分析","authors":"Rebecca Duncan, Charlie Eggleton","doi":"10.34239/ajops.v5n2.343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gender-affirming breast surgery (colloquially known as ‘top surgery’) can be an important intervention for transgender individuals. Top surgery is also a key component of care for non-binary and gender non-conforming individuals. Aotearoa New Zealand secondary care physicians are not aware of all available services, and no studies have investigated public perception of availability and funding of top surgery in Aotearoa.\nMethod: We analysed the text and comments sections of all relevant Aotearoa news articles over a five-year period using a general inductive thematic analysis approach. Articles were included if they were published between 2015 and 2020, available online, text-based (that is, articles solely in video format were not included), and contained the words ‘chest’, ‘breast’, ‘top’, 'implant', 'implants', ‘mastectomy’ or ‘boob’.\nResults: The analysis resulted in a model of four themes–public funding, [trans] experiences, [trans] issues amenable to intervention and [trans] issues not amenable to intervention.\nConclusion: The discourse around top surgery in Aotearoa is mixed; some individuals consider top surgery to be an essential medical procedure deserving of public funding, while others describe it as a frivolous cosmetic procedure. The perspectives of transgender individuals clearly communicated a frustration around a lack of funding and transparency in the availability of top surgery in Aotearoa. We recommend the release of clear criteria from the Ministry of Health regarding public funding and availability of top surgery across Aotearoa to address this frustration.","PeriodicalId":264055,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mainstream media discourse around top surgery in Aeotearoa New Zealand: a qualitative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Duncan, Charlie Eggleton\",\"doi\":\"10.34239/ajops.v5n2.343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Gender-affirming breast surgery (colloquially known as ‘top surgery’) can be an important intervention for transgender individuals. Top surgery is also a key component of care for non-binary and gender non-conforming individuals. Aotearoa New Zealand secondary care physicians are not aware of all available services, and no studies have investigated public perception of availability and funding of top surgery in Aotearoa.\\nMethod: We analysed the text and comments sections of all relevant Aotearoa news articles over a five-year period using a general inductive thematic analysis approach. Articles were included if they were published between 2015 and 2020, available online, text-based (that is, articles solely in video format were not included), and contained the words ‘chest’, ‘breast’, ‘top’, 'implant', 'implants', ‘mastectomy’ or ‘boob’.\\nResults: The analysis resulted in a model of four themes–public funding, [trans] experiences, [trans] issues amenable to intervention and [trans] issues not amenable to intervention.\\nConclusion: The discourse around top surgery in Aotearoa is mixed; some individuals consider top surgery to be an essential medical procedure deserving of public funding, while others describe it as a frivolous cosmetic procedure. The perspectives of transgender individuals clearly communicated a frustration around a lack of funding and transparency in the availability of top surgery in Aotearoa. We recommend the release of clear criteria from the Ministry of Health regarding public funding and availability of top surgery across Aotearoa to address this frustration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v5n2.343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v5n2.343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mainstream media discourse around top surgery in Aeotearoa New Zealand: a qualitative analysis
Background: Gender-affirming breast surgery (colloquially known as ‘top surgery’) can be an important intervention for transgender individuals. Top surgery is also a key component of care for non-binary and gender non-conforming individuals. Aotearoa New Zealand secondary care physicians are not aware of all available services, and no studies have investigated public perception of availability and funding of top surgery in Aotearoa.
Method: We analysed the text and comments sections of all relevant Aotearoa news articles over a five-year period using a general inductive thematic analysis approach. Articles were included if they were published between 2015 and 2020, available online, text-based (that is, articles solely in video format were not included), and contained the words ‘chest’, ‘breast’, ‘top’, 'implant', 'implants', ‘mastectomy’ or ‘boob’.
Results: The analysis resulted in a model of four themes–public funding, [trans] experiences, [trans] issues amenable to intervention and [trans] issues not amenable to intervention.
Conclusion: The discourse around top surgery in Aotearoa is mixed; some individuals consider top surgery to be an essential medical procedure deserving of public funding, while others describe it as a frivolous cosmetic procedure. The perspectives of transgender individuals clearly communicated a frustration around a lack of funding and transparency in the availability of top surgery in Aotearoa. We recommend the release of clear criteria from the Ministry of Health regarding public funding and availability of top surgery across Aotearoa to address this frustration.